Greetings,
Old topic, I know, but just came across it after a long hiatus.
Instead of 16...,Be6, which seems passive as it invites 17Nc5 with exchanges, I was wondering about 16...,Nf4 - obviously threatening the fork on e2 - with 17...,Bf5/a6 to follow, or 16...,Bf5 (17Bxd5, cd just opens up the c-file with the rooks coming to c8 and b8) followed by 17...,Nf4 and 18...,Ra/f-d8.
This seems to, at least, make things a bit more interesting rather than exchanging into a so-so ending.
Another option, though less appealing, is 16...,e5 with either 17...,Be6/f5 or 17...,Nf4 or 17...,Rd8 (or 17...,Rad8, if the bishop's moved).
Not sure how appealing/useful these would be - no silicon pet on this laptop.
Kindest regards,
James
|