Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense (Read 15245 times)
PANFR
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 256
Location: Greece
Joined: 10/31/11
Gender: Male
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #16 - 11/30/11 at 21:33:47
Post Tools
Don't worry, Ametanoitos... the army isn't such a big annoyance nowadays. Back in 1986, I had to stay there for 28 months...  Shocked
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1427
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #15 - 11/29/11 at 07:39:48
Post Tools
None seems that have spotted my post on http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1315850743/16#16. Maybe this will provide some food for thought.

By the way, Panfr, welcome to the foroum! O just noticed that you are a regular poster here these days. As for me, Army doesn't leave me much time for chesspub. But this will change soon... Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #14 - 11/27/11 at 01:06:03
Post Tools
TN wrote on 11/26/11 at 23:54:09:
@Markovich

The idea is to play ...Bg7, ...0-0, ...Nd5, ...f5 and ...e4. Subscribers to the 1.e4 e5 section can see Mikhalevski's notes to the game Schartz-Iordachesu.

Yeah I know, there's a similar plan against      8.Qf3. But I'm not sure of it here.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #13 - 11/26/11 at 23:54:09
Post Tools
@Markovich

The idea is to play ...Bg7, ...0-0, ...Nd5, ...f5 and ...e4. Subscribers to the 1.e4 e5 section can see Mikhalevski's notes to the game Schartz-Iordachesu.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #12 - 11/26/11 at 20:48:13
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 11/26/11 at 16:12:38:
sloughter wrote on 11/26/11 at 10:05:03:
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 08/01/11 at 19:10:34:
Thx for the link, trw.

I shoulda guessed there'd be quite a bit of conversation about 8.Bd3 in part because it's counter-intuitive ("it doesn't look like chess" to Markovich), and yet White gets a material edge for vague compensation according to the other thread.

Even so, I still prefer 8.Bd3 to 8.Qf3. I doubt either of these will become the "Main line" of the Two Knights Defense any time soon.


Another try is 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Be2 O-O 10.Nh3 f5 11.d3 e4 12.dxe4 dxe4 13.Qxe4 Bf5 14.Qa4 Bxh3 15.gxh3 Bg5 16.Bxg5 Qxg5ch 17.Qg4 Qe5 18.Bd3 Qxb2 19.Nd2 Nf4 20.Rab1 (Qxa2 ? 21.Rb7!) & White completes his development.


If 15...Bg5 16.f4 is interesting. If Black can't play f5/e4 Black will lose the initiative & breaking up the White King position with Bxh3 seems necessary to make progress. Can anyone find improvements for Black from moves 10-16?

If 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Be2 O-O 10.Nh3 Bg4 11.Qg3 holds the pawn.


Is 8.Qf3 even on topic?

But 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Be2 O-O 10.Nh3 and now 10...f5 appears to me to be an illegal move.

As Black I would prefer 10...e4 now.  Less good seems 10...Bg4, not because of 11.Qg3 Bxe2 when White loses his castling priviliges, but because of 11.Qd3, which looks a little better for White than after 10...e4.  Are we on the same page?

Sometimes I wonder if we're talking about the same game.

But I imagine that I'm not the only forum visitor who is growing weary of repeated arguments here that 8.Bd3 or 8.Qf3, or similar, refutes the Two Knights, arising from the inability of some club-level player and his engine to see Black's compensation.

But if anyone thinks that White is doing well in these lines I would strongly urge him to play them and discover for himself just how much comp Black has.

@TN: I don't understand 8...g6.  Why spend time on a pawn move that doesn't seem particularly necessary?
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #11 - 11/26/11 at 16:12:38
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 11/26/11 at 10:05:03:
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 08/01/11 at 19:10:34:
Thx for the link, trw.

I shoulda guessed there'd be quite a bit of conversation about 8.Bd3 in part because it's counter-intuitive ("it doesn't look like chess" to Markovich), and yet White gets a material edge for vague compensation according to the other thread.

Even so, I still prefer 8.Bd3 to 8.Qf3. I doubt either of these will become the "Main line" of the Two Knights Defense any time soon.


Another try is 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Be2 O-O 10.Nh3 f5 11.d3 e4 12.dxe4 dxe4 13.Qxe4 Bf5 14.Qa4 Bxh3 15.gxh3 Bg5 16.Bxg5 Qxg5ch 17.Qg4 Qe5 18.Bd3 Qxb2 19.Nd2 Nf4 20.Rab1 (Qxa2 ? 21.Rb7!) & White completes his development.


If 15...Bg5 16.f4 is interesting. If Black can't play f5/e4 Black will lose the initiative & breaking up the White King position with Bxh3 seems necessary to make progress. Can anyone find improvements for Black from moves 10-16?

If 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Be2 O-O 10.Nh3 Bg4 11.Qg3 holds the pawn.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #10 - 11/26/11 at 14:37:43
Post Tools
Sorry not to respond to 8...g6, which I'll look at later.

Whether compensation is "nebulous" or not is entirely a matter of judgment. They say everything in specificity in chess, but when I play chess, I find I often have to rely on my judgment. 

To me, Black's compensation looks good after 8.Bd3 Nd5.  Remarks above about there being no point in playing this move reveal, in my view, a lack of understanding of this game.  Just possibly it is not the best move on the board at this particular moment; but it is certainly a highly thematic move.

Since no one has proposed dismissing out of hand either 8.Qf3 or 8.Bd3, I fail to understand why remarks above asserting the inadvisability of dismissing these moves were made. The question has been not whether 8.Bd3 can be dismissed, but whether it
is likely to be good chess play.  Obvious as Black in difficult systems like the Two Knights, one has to prepare even for suboptimal play. One has to prepare for 5...Na5 6.d3 for example, a move that superficially has more to recommend it than 8.Bd3, yet which happens not to work.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #9 - 11/26/11 at 13:17:53
Post Tools
What do you guys think of 8.Bd3 g6?
« Last Edit: 11/26/11 at 14:41:04 by TN »  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PANFR
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 256
Location: Greece
Joined: 10/31/11
Gender: Male
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #8 - 11/26/11 at 12:01:04
Post Tools
Both 8.Bd3 and 8.Qf3 are interesting. I believe Black is OK in both, but it would be silly to discard them based on silicon based analysis.
I also had the impression that 8.Bd3 does not look like a sane chess move, but as far as a move does not lose by force, it has to be taken seriously.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #7 - 11/26/11 at 10:05:03
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 08/01/11 at 19:10:34:
Thx for the link, trw.

I shoulda guessed there'd be quite a bit of conversation about 8.Bd3 in part because it's counter-intuitive ("it doesn't look like chess" to Markovich), and yet White gets a material edge for vague compensation according to the other thread.

Even so, I still prefer 8.Bd3 to 8.Qf3. I doubt either of these will become the "Main line" of the Two Knights Defense any time soon.


Another try is 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Be2 O-O 10.Nh3 f5 11.d3 e4 12.dxe4 dxe4 13.Qxe4 Bf5 14.Qa4 Bxh3 15.gxh3 Bg5 16.Bxg5 Qxg5ch 17.Qg4 Qe5 18.Bd3 Qxb2 19.Nd2 Nf4 20.Rab1 (Qxa2 ? 21.Rb7!) & White completes his development.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #6 - 08/01/11 at 19:10:34
Post Tools
Thx for the link, trw.

I shoulda guessed there'd be quite a bit of conversation about 8.Bd3 in part because it's counter-intuitive ("it doesn't look like chess" to Markovich), and yet White gets a material edge for vague compensation according to the other thread.

Even so, I still prefer 8.Bd3 to 8.Qf3. I doubt either of these will become the "Main line" of the Two Knights Defense any time soon.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
trw
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1414
Joined: 05/06/08
Gender: Male
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #5 - 08/01/11 at 18:44:47
Post Tools
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: C58: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #4 - 08/01/11 at 12:57:56
Post Tools
I wonder, in what world is 8.Qf3 considered the main line of the Two Knights Defense?

ECO considers 8.Be2 to be the main line, and the vast majority of GM games have featured 8.Be2 over 8.Qf3, with much better practical results for white historically.

Quote:
1) 10...h6 11.Ne4 & there is no point in avoiding the exchange of Knights with Nd5; White castles Queenside and plays g4 +/-,



After 8.Qf3 Be7 9.h4  h6 10.Ne4 Nd5, I don't see how White gets a + advantage, even by an eventual 0-0-0 and g4. White's first problem is what to do with the light-squared Bishop, his second is that castling Q-side will take quite a while. Black doesn't have to sit back, castle into an attack, and wait to be mated. For instance, 11.Be2 0-0 12.d3 f5 and White won't be getting g4 in any time soon and his pieces lack coordination.


I'm more curious about 8.Bd3 intending 9.Qf3. Here's how David Navara played 8.Bd3 in a losing effort:

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #3 - 08/01/11 at 12:49:53
Post Tools
dfan wrote on 08/01/11 at 02:32:41:
sloughter wrote on 08/01/11 at 00:30:39:
3) Finally, 10...Nd5? 11.g4! with a powerful initiative +/-

It's just a computer, but Houdini gives this line as its PV (I let it go to 20 ply for every move):

10...Nd5 11.g4 f5 12.gxf5 Bxf5 13.d3 Nb4 14.Na3 Bxd3 15.Qg2 Bxe2 16.Kxe2 Qb6 17.Be3 Qa6+ 18.Ke1 Nd5

and if I had to pick a side in the ensuing position, I'd pick Black. Any improvements for White along the way?


I don't understand why 10...Nd5 would be so disapprovingly decorated. 11.g4 looks weak to me, e.g. 11...h6 12.Ne4 h5!? 13.gxh5 f5 14.Nc3 e4 15.Qg3 f4 16.Qg1 Bf5 after which I can catch a distinct whiff of White's blood.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dfan
God Member
*****
Offline


"When you see a bad move,
look for a better one"

Posts: 766
Location: Boston
Joined: 10/04/05
Re: Main line Two Knights' Defense
Reply #2 - 08/01/11 at 02:32:41
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 08/01/11 at 00:30:39:
3) Finally, 10...Nd5? 11.g4! with a powerful initiative +/-

It's just a computer, but Houdini gives this line as its PV (I let it go to 20 ply for every move):

10...Nd5 11.g4 f5 12.gxf5 Bxf5 13.d3 Nb4 14.Na3 Bxd3 15.Qg2 Bxe2 16.Kxe2 Qb6 17.Be3 Qa6+ 18.Ke1 Nd5

and if I had to pick a side in the ensuing position, I'd pick Black. Any improvements for White along the way?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo