Normal Topic Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4! (Read 9129 times)
Glenn Snow
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1720
Location: Franklin
Joined: 09/27/03
Gender: Male
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #9 - 06/20/13 at 05:42:29
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 06/18/13 at 18:23:18:
I must agree with Girkassa. Yes, play has transposed to the Sicilian Wing Gambit. Any ideas?


In my last post, I did mention this, (After 2.a3, and now instead of 2...c5) "It recommends 2...Nf6 and various followups (3...c5, 3...d5, 3...e5, etc...) depending on what White does.  It claims equality then.  It likes 2.b5 better.  More research is need unsurprisingly."
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #8 - 06/19/13 at 08:38:59
Post Tools
That's hardly the sort of fate that worries black when he starts playing around with moves like 1 .. Na6 Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #7 - 06/18/13 at 18:23:18
Post Tools
I must agree with Girkassa. Yes, play has transposed to the Sicilian Wing Gambit. Any ideas?
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Girkassa
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 433
Joined: 04/07/07
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #6 - 05/20/13 at 17:42:27
Post Tools
Indeed, after 1.b4 Na6 2.a3 c5 3.e4 cxb4 4.axb4 Nxb4, play has transposed to the Sicilian wing gambit line 1.e4 c5 2.b4 cxb4 3.a3 Nc6 4.axb4 Nxb4, which I think is not supposed to be Black's best reaction to the wing gambit? Or do you have another idea in mind for Black, Stefan?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Glenn Snow
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1720
Location: Franklin
Joined: 09/27/03
Gender: Male
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #5 - 05/10/13 at 06:31:51
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 12/12/11 at 08:21:26:
Weird. But instead, 1 b4 Na6 2  a3 looks OK for White. No need to play 2 b5 here, as that is exactly what Black wants.

 
I don't know the theoretical status, but I think after 1.b4 Na6 2.a3 the idea was to play 2...c5.  However, I put the position on Houdini and it prefers White after the gambit 3.e4.  It recommends 2...Nf6 and various followups (3...c5, 3...d5, 3...e5, etc...) depending on what White does.  It claims equality then.  It likes 2.b5 better.  More research is need unsurprisingly.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kshorg
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 30
Joined: 04/08/09
Gender: Male
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #4 - 12/12/11 at 11:01:56
Post Tools
I would play a3 and i still like White position
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #3 - 12/12/11 at 08:21:26
Post Tools
Weird. But instead, 1 b4 Na6 2  a3 looks OK for White. No need to play 2 b5 here, as that is exactly what Black wants.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #2 - 11/12/11 at 17:03:45
Post Tools
Gerard's game is very nice. I had written a small article for MOB in the 1980s, recommending 1.b4 Na6 and 1.g4 Nh6 2.g5 (2.h3 f5) 2...Nf5 3.e4 Nd6. Of course, 1.Nf3 b5 2.Na3 should be good, too.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PANFR
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 256
Location: Greece
Joined: 10/31/11
Gender: Male
Re: Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
Reply #1 - 11/12/11 at 16:38:09
Post Tools
No experience with it, and while the whole line looks and feels hilarious, positionally speaking 3...Ne4 makes more sense than 3...Ne6.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Ask Mr. Buecker to beat 1.b4!
11/11/11 at 19:54:12
Post Tools
Hi,

strolling through Stephen Giddins Blog ( http://stevegiddinschessblog.wordpress.com/) I came accross the following game (commentary Gerard Welling as posted in the blog):

White: Christophe Ramme
Black: Gerard Welling
Bad Wiessee 2011
“The young German player Ramme, whose IM friend helped him to prepare for each game, intended to surprise me. So the game started
1. b4
“and after about 5 minutes of pondering, trying to think of some independent reply, I remembered Stefan Bücker’s recommendation of 30 years ago, and played
1…Na6!
The game proceeded
2. b5
(2. a3 c5!)
2… Nc5 3. d4 Ne4!?

Stefan’s line went 3..Ne6 but I was reminded of Dick van Geet’s suggestion at the time to play 3..Ne4.

4. e3

4. f3 Nd6 5. e4 f5 (or 5… g6) was Dick’s line, which he may even have played in the 1960s against J J Lindner, a 1.b4 specialist.

4… b6 5. Bd3 Bb7 6. f3 Nd6 7. e4 e6

Bringing 8.e5 Qh4+xd4 into the position, and also preparing an eventual hypermodern pincer move..f5.

8. Ne2 f5 9. e5 Nf7 10. Be3 g5!?
Kingside space and preparing an eventual softening up by means of ..h5-..g4.

11. Nd2 Ne7 12. h4?
Choking.

12…gxh4 13. Rxh4?? Nd5 14. Bf2 Ne3!

and White is dead. He resisted for quite a few moves after 15. Bxe3 Qxh4+ but in the end it was futile.. Stefan Bücker was delighted to see this practical try of his provocative idea 1..Na6!”
It is 24 hours since I first saw this, but I still can’t stop laughing. As the old saying has it, “He who would sup with the Devil needs a long spoon!”.

Interesting stuff: 1.b4 Na6!? 

Any experience, anyone Smiley?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo