(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › Dragon Sicilians › Yugoslav 9 0-0-0 & Intro › B75: Accelerated Soltis variation.
(Moderator: MNb)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
Normal Topic B75: Accelerated Soltis variation. (Read 5391 times)
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1831
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: B75: Accelerated Soltis variation.
Reply #2 - 01/18/12 at 10:38:09
Post Tools
Andrew Martin had a similar idea but he prefered Bd7 instead of immideate h5. His idea was to delay castling unless white entered Bc4 yugoslav.  

I recall a highlevel game where Khalifman was white and blased through in the centre and won but I am not shure exactly in what lines it was, there was some delayed castle llien where black has played h5.
« Last Edit: 01/18/12 at 16:25:17 by bragesjo »  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
MNb
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10764
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: B75: Accelerated Soltis variation.
Reply #1 - 01/17/12 at 01:11:43
Post Tools
flaviddude wrote on 01/17/12 at 00:31:33:
I have only a few games on my database and none at a high level.

A certain corr. player Gurtovojs, rated 2385, has scored ½/3 with it. Unsurprisingly all players of the white side continued with 8.Qd2 or 8.Bc4 and 9.Qd2. So the question is: how does Black continue? What is his idea?
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
flaviddude
Senior Member
****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 329
Location: Australia
Joined: 01/12/04
Gender: Male
B75: Accelerated Soltis variation.
01/17/12 at 00:31:33
Post Tools
Hi all,

I checked out on my database the following unusual idea that I have dubbed the accelerated Soltis variation.

1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 d6
3.d4 Nf6 a useful transposition
4.Nc3 cxd
5.Nxd4 g6
6. Be3 Bg7
7. f3 h5 If this works it avoids the g4 lines mentioned in another thread. 
I have only a few games on my database and none at a high level.

1) Is there a known refutation of this line?

2) what is best play for both sides?
  
I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge