Steckner/Kantorovich White's chances (part 1)
What are exactly white's chances
In the ideal world white would like
1. First bring out his rook to c7/d7 and his a/pawn to a7.
2.a. Then bring his king to b8 and then push his pawn.
2.b. To bring out his rook from the 7th rank behind his pawn.
The next diagram shows an essential building block:
How does white get his king from the 7th behind his pawn.
The answer is, with rank checks, benefiting from the fact that the Black king has no shelter against these checks once it moves down the board.
Diagram 23 (Gurevich-Glek, Vlissingen, 2002) 1.Rc4+!, Kxg3
2.Ra4! +-, Rxa7
3.Rxa7 , Kxh4 Diagram 24 (White to move) And White had no difficulty to convert his material advantage into a win starting with the accurate
9.Kc3!,Kg3 10.Kd2!
Following the receipt given in the technical section, that getting the White king in front of the pawns has priority.
Note that the greedy
9.Rxf7,Kg3= would still have thrown away the win after all because Black will play
...h4! on the next move.
Reaching a position that is drawn even without the presence of the f- and g-pawn (a reminder to my advice to concentrate calculation on the most advanced pawn).
We are now ready to appreciate the Kantorovich/Steckner study.
Diagram 25 Compared to the position by Fine, White has two advantages.
It is his move, and his rook is on the 7th rank, keeping an eye on the f-pawn and hindering counter play with Kf5.
It was not until 2003 that this position was considered to be extremely dangerous for Black. Indeed Kantorovich had published this position as drawn in 1989. In 2003 Steckner showed variations on which the position was judged a win for white. But now thx to Poghesyan we can pronounce it a draw after all.
1.Kd4! (Steckner)
1.Ra8?, Kf5!= as shown in the study by Fine (diagram 10 and 11).
1......., Rxf2? It was not realized that this was the losing move, until Poghosyan's discovered that 1...g5!! still draws.
1....Kf5? Is no longer sufficient. Thx to his rook on the 7th white replies 2.Rxf7+ We will illustrate that below.
2.Rc7!! This is the first important step. White extracts his rook from its unfavourable position. Now it can cover the pawn from the side.
2.........,, Ra2 To prepare the advance of the black king, and stop the a-pawn.
3.a7!! An important point. White wants to push the pawn as far as possible. Kantorovich proved correctly that 3.Rc6 only draws.
It is absolutely necessary to advance the pawn to the 7th rank.
3........., Kf5! Black cant wait. 3....Ra3 4.Kc4!+- is even more favourable for white.
Diagram 26 4.Kc4!!, Steckner’s discovery.
Kantorovich only considered
4.Rxf7+,Kg4 5.Kc5,Kxg3= when there is no longer a win. Black next captures the h-pawn and sacs his rook against the a-pawn if necessary.
We have seen this method in diagram 10 (Krogius-Ilitzky)
4........, Kg4 Both 4....f6 and 4....Ra1 are answered by 5.Kb5!
Setting up the threat1. Rc5+ Kf6 2Rc6-a6 or 1...Kg4 2.Rc4-a4.
After 4....Rc2+ 5.Kb3/4, Rxa2 6.a8Q+- Black lacks the time to build a fortress (the details are in the pgn-file).
5.Kb3!, The final stage. White is ready to put his rook behind his pawn, with the help of a rank check. Note that this method was also employed frequently in the Hollis-Florian analysis.
Note that Kb3 wins an essential tempo:
5.Kb4?, f5! Would have thrown the win away:
6.Rc4+, f4!!= Diagram 27 5....,Ra5 (5...Ra6 makes no difference) 6.Rc4+
transposes to Gurevich-Glek above. 5....Ra1 is even worse since after Rc4+-Ra4 the white
rook is between blacks rook and the a-pawn. So Black not even gets to sac the rook for the a-pawn.
One final observation, to illustrate how vital tempi are in these positions. Suppose in the above position that blacks rook is already on a6.
The Black saves himself with
5.....Kxg3 6.Rc3+,Kxh4 7.Rc4+,Kg3! 8.Ra4,Rxa7 9.Rxa7
And this endgame R vs. 3p is drawn!.
We still have to illustrate that actually
1.Kd4, Kf5 does not work Diagram 28 1.Rxf7+ This move is of course not possible with the rook on a8.
1.........., Ke6 1...Kg4 2.a7!+-
And the white king walks to the a-pawn, while Black has no counter play whatsoever.
2.Rg7! Winning an important tempo
2........, Kf6
3.Ra7, Rxf2 3.....Kf5 4.Ra8! (4.f3 +-),
Kg4 (4...Rxf2+ 5.Rf8+ +-)
5.Kc5,Rxf2 6.Rg8!+- And White takes on g6 with check, simultaneously defending the a-pawn. Notice how Blacks defence is crippled by the absence of his f7-pawn.
4.Rb7 First part of whites plan: looking for Rook and a-pawn on the 7th
4........, Ra2 4......Kf5?? 5.Rf7+ +-
5.a7 , Kf5
6.Kc5, Kg4 White has completed the first part of his plan. While black is running late with his counter play.
Diagram 29 7.Rb4!!+ A move to remember. White provides a shelter for his king while simultaneously defending his h-pawn.
7.........., Kxg3
8. Kb6 +- There is nothing Black can do about Kb7-a8Q. Had the f-pawn still been on board ....f5 would have provided drawing chances.
(See the final examples of the technical intermezzo)
Even if the rook is on a8 White is not without chances.
Provided that his king is close enough to the a-pawn. Diagram 30 (Lerner-Dorfmann/analysis) This position was actually thought to be drawn as late as 2003.
But looking at it from an objective point of view we can see that it is actually as favourable for White as the Kantorovich/Steckman position. His king is closer to the a-pawn than in Steckners position. And the pawn on f3 – if it remains on the board- preempts counter play with Kf5-g4.
(In the game Blacks king was on g7 and he played Rxf3 (see pgn))
1.Kc6 Vulfson showed that 1.Kc5 wins as well.
1........, Rxf3 1.....Kf5 is lost as well as shown by Steckner 2.Kb5!,Rxf3 3.Rf8 +-
2.Rb8??, Ra3!
3.Rb6 , Kf5
4.Kb7 , Kg4
5.a7 , Rxa7+ 6.Kxa7, Kxg3= (Anakaev)
The variation above was the intended drawing solution.
After
7.Rb4,f5!= we have the drawn position form the technical intermezzo.
Vulfson showed the correct solution to the position in 2003.
2.Rd8! (instead of 2.Rb8??)
Diagram 31 2......, Ra3 Obviously there is no time for Rxg3 since after a7 the a-pawn promotes under favourable circumstances.
Checking the king does not help:
2...Rc3+, 3.Kb5,Rb3+ 4.Ka4,Rb1 5.Rd3! +-
3.Kb5! Shows the point. Now Black is no longer in a position to initiate counter play with Kf5. White intends to complete the manoeuvre Rd4 followed by Ra4 winning simply.
3......., Ke5! The only move to prevent Rd4. Checking the king does not help here either: 3....Rc3+? 4.Ka4,Rb1 5.Rd3+-
4.Rd7!, Ensures that White can move his a-pawn to the 7th rank.
5.........., f6
6.a7! Phase 1 completed. Rook and a-pawn are on the 7th!.
Diagram 32 And Blacks position has become hopeless. He has no longer any counter play. White will move his rook to c7 and threaten a rank checks followed by either Rc6/Ra6 or Rc4/Ra4.
For instance 6...g5 7.Rc7!,gxh 8.gxh,f5 9.Rc5+,Ke4 10.Ra4+-
or
6..Kf5 7.Kb4!,Ra6 8.Rd5+,Kg4 9.Ra5!+- The above method does not always work. Sometimes White's king must seek a temporary shelter on a7, and the white rook must help the king to escape eventually.
Diagram 33 (Teaching example) 1.Ka7! 1.Kc?,Ra2 2.Kb7,Kf5!= would give Black the extra tempo needed to draw. Note that Black has an extra tempo over diagram 31.
1........, Rb3 Eying the g3-pawn. An alternative was 1....Kf5 2.Rb8,Rg2!?
3.Rb4! +- cutting off the Black king.or 3.Rb3 +- (defending the g3-pawn).
2.Rb8 With gain of tempo.
[b]2........., Rxg3[/b]
There is nothing better. 2....Ra3 3.Rb5!+- compared to the main line. Black doesn't even get a pawn for his troubles.
3.Rb5!! The key move. White cuts off the black king from the important g4-square. At the same time he provides shelter from rook checks along the line and rank.
This position coincides with one given by Mueller (his analysis on move 73 Bacrot-Robson).
Diagram 34 (Mueller) 3........, Re3 With the aim to give rank checks. Hopeless is 3....Ra3
4.Kb6,g5 (on waiting moves like 4...Ra4 5.a7! To be followed by Ra5)
5.hxg+,Kg6 6.a7 +- 4.Kb6, Re6+
5.Ka5!, 5.Ka7, Re3 repeats the position after move 3.
5..........Re7 Obstructs the march of the a-pawn.
Diagram 35 In the above diagram. 6.Rb7, Re5+ 7.Rb5,Re7
would make no progress so White needs something else.
6.Rc5!! Prepares Kb6, since Re6+ can now be answered with Rc6 winning immediately.
6........., Ke6 6....Re1 7.a7,Ra1+ 8.Kb6 +- with Ra5 to follow.
7.Kb6,, f6
8.a7+- The endgame after
8...Rxa7 9.Kxa7+- is an easy win, since Black has no counter play whatsoever.
The next example bears some similarity to diagram (32). It has been taken from the Kantorovich/Steckner Study (side variation 4...f6), but has also occurred in an actual game.
Diagram 36 (Coenen-Kern/2001)
Despite the fact that the a-pawn is now supported by the white king, White's task is not simple.
1......., Rb2+! Gives white the opportunity to go wrong.
1....Kg4+- 2.Rc6!! (threat: Ra6), Rxa7+ 3.Kxa7,Kxg3 4.Rxf6+-
2.Kc8! White evades the imprisonment of his king, because there is insufficient time for the extraction maneuver.
2.Ka8?=,Kg4! 3.Rb7,Ra2 4.a8Q,Rxa8 5.Kxa8,Kxg3 6.Rb4,f5!=
We have reached diagram 20 from the technical intermezzo.
2.......... Ra2
3.Rg7!! Steckners discovery and the only winning move, but missed in Coenen-Kern,2001. Now 3.Kb8?=,Kg4! 4.a8Q,Rxa8 5.Qxa8,Kxg3= Now 6.Rc4, f5!= Again drawing by example 20 technical intermezzo.
3........., Kxg3
4.Rxg6+, Kh3
5.Rg7!+-
Diagram 37 The fight is over. White is ready to promote
5...f5 6.Kb8,Rb2+ 7.Rb7,Ra2 8.a8Q,Rxa8 9.Rxa8,.Kxg3 10.Rg8+,Kxh4 11.Kb7+- see technical intermezzo (diag 20-22)