Latest Updates:
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit (Read 17968 times)
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #18 - 11/29/12 at 16:32:40
Post Tools
To Summarize :

1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 c5 6.d5
is the Kaulich defense of the BDG

4...c5 is the Brombacher Counter-gambit which transposes into the Kaulich after the expected 5.d5 exf3 6.Nxf3

Is there a specific name for 6.Qxf3 then or is this the original continuation of the Brombacher Counter-gambit ?!

Otherwise, I fail to see any difference between the Kaulich and Brombacher!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SWJediknight
God Member
*****
Offline


Alert... opponent out
of book!

Posts: 900
Joined: 03/14/08
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #17 - 11/29/12 at 14:26:33
Post Tools
It strikes me that this is a line of the Albin Counter-Gambit (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 d4 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.g3 f6), with colours reversed and with an extra tempo for White.  5...f6 is not one of Black's better moves in that line of the Albin, but even so, I think the extra tempo must surely change the assessment to at least equal for White.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 718
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #16 - 11/29/12 at 11:34:16
Post Tools
According to Leisebein too, this is the Brombacher's counter gambit. He cites a game Diemer,E-Brombacher/Kandern 1949 where it begins with 4..c5 5.d5 exf3 6.Nxf3 a6 7.a4 etc. If you play 6..g6 instead, you can get this position from the Bogoljubov defense too (4..exf3 5.Nxf3 g6), where Black can play ..c5 later but that's not so common to play the Bogoljubov defense like this.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dragonslayer
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 244
Location: Copenhagen
Joined: 06/13/04
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #15 - 11/28/12 at 23:58:08
Post Tools
Google, Scheerer and some other books say: "Brombacher counter gambit" (don't ask me why, maybe something to do with it being played in Brombach, Germany)
Some databases say Bogoljubov played 4...c5 against Diemer in South Baden 1948. Maybe someone knows an earlier game?
Gedult actually preferred 5.Bf4 as does Scheerer.
After 5.d5, 5...exf3 6.Nxf3 transposes to the Kaulich defence.
There's also 1.d4 d5 2.e4 c5 3.Bf4 with a direct transposition to the Morris gambit (in this move-order White has a better move).

GMEricPrie wrote on 11/28/12 at 16:26:43:
Anyone knows the name of this BDG line : 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 c5 and 5.d5 I reckon then must be the main (if not only) move ?
Afterwards 5...exf3 6.Nxf3 g6 ?
And 7.Bf4 may not be best for it does not threat Nb5 in this move order but it actually transposes into the Morris gambit!

Also, is there a name as early as this stage attached to 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.f3?! and then 3...c5 4.e4 (following  4...cxd4! 5.Qxd4 Nc6 6.Bb5 Bd7 7.Bxc6 Bxc6 8.e5 Nd7!) The idea is that 4...dxe4?! transposes in this case...

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #14 - 11/28/12 at 16:26:43
Post Tools
Anyone knows the name of this BDG line : 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 c5 and 5.d5 I reckon then must be the main (if not only) move ?
Afterwards 5...exf3 6.Nxf3 g6 ?
And 7.Bf4 may not be best for it does not threat Nb5 in this move order but it actually transposes into the Morris gambit!

Also, is there a name as early as this stage attached to 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.f3?! and then 3...c5 4.e4 (following  4...cxd4! 5.Qxd4 Nc6 6.Bb5 Bd7 7.Bxc6 Bxc6 8.e5 Nd7!) The idea is that 4...dxe4?! transposes in this case...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FirebrandX
Junior Member
**
Offline


What would Houdini do?

Posts: 83
Location: North of Dallas, Texas, USA
Joined: 05/01/07
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #13 - 09/12/12 at 02:25:45
Post Tools
Against 5. Bf4, Aveskulov suggests 5...Nc6 6. c3 e6 7. Qc2 f5! 8. 0-0-0 Bd6 in his new book "Attack with Black"
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1382
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #12 - 09/07/12 at 05:17:35
Post Tools
I agree with Glenn Snow that 5.Be3 is best in the Hübsch Gambit.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
walkingterrapin
Junior Member
**
Offline


Why play the Colle when
you can play 1.e4!!!!!!!!!

Posts: 98
Location: NC
Joined: 07/04/10
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #11 - 09/06/12 at 18:49:53
Post Tools
The Hubsch is no major problem for the blackmar diemer, you are removing a k side defender with a queenside piece.  Black will have a hard time hold against any white moves after the exchange. 

I do not trust moving the bishop off of c4, you are just wasting time.  Instead on the 8th move, just play f3 or castle q side.  Any gambit is a battle for time, the bishop on c4 has been blunted by e6 already, there is no reason to keep it especially to trade it for blacks only developed piece.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1387
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #10 - 08/10/12 at 12:45:12
Post Tools
Why do you think I do not play the Hubsch over-the-board? Because I do not trust it.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Glenn Snow
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1710
Location: Franklin
Joined: 09/27/03
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #9 - 07/24/12 at 10:56:15
Post Tools
Eric Diemerophile wrote on 07/22/12 at 17:43:54:
To Gambit, the 5.Bf4 is clearly a different way as the classical Bc4. And every plan should differ from Black and White side, I think a draw with a perfect play is the natural result.

To Glen Snow, the 5.Be3 variation is to me better for Black each time Black will use a Fianchetto. And just for this slow move, I dislike it !

Dear GM, what I think is that your opponent facilitates you to demonstrate you choose the good defense. But... certainly 6.f3, 6.c3, 6.Nh3 and 6.Ne2 have to be preferred ! Geigel made a too slow move according to me due to the wish to make long castling. And what we see in your game is that your Knight succeded alone to punish both Bc4 and Be3 to play inaccurately... and to protect the pawn more.

And much better, your opponent surprisingly decided to win pawns on the white shelter side, where your pieces can react with energy quickly. The Queen trap is finally just for fun. But yes at this moment white was already lost.

I am sorry, but I cannot accept to let Black thinking it is a bad opening for white only by this game. White has misunderstood the opening... from almost the starting of the game !!! White didn't plan as he must have to do. His rated level was nice (to me) but he was maybe impressed by having first started such a tournament by the future winner !


To be honest I'm pretty skeptical about White's chances no matter what he plays but I'd still argue that at this point 5.Be3 is the best way to drum up compensation while avoiding simplification.  If Black fianchettos with 5...g6 then Scheerer in his "the Blackmar-Diemer gambit" offers 6.f3 exf3 7.Nxf3 Bg7 8.Bc4 0-0 9.0-0 Nd7 10.Qe1.  I'm not sure why White couldn't meet ...g6 the same way he does with 5.Bf4, e.g., 5...g6 6.Qd2 Bg7 7.0-0-0 0-0 8.Bh6 is one obvious variation that could come from other move orders.  5.Bf4 also has the annoying 5...e6 6.0-0-0 Nc6! variation to contend with.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Eric Diemerophile
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 05/11/10
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #8 - 07/22/12 at 17:43:54
Post Tools
To Gambit, the 5.Bf4 is clearly a different way as the classical Bc4. And every plan should differ from Black and White side, I think a draw with a perfect play is the natural result.

To Glen Snow, the 5.Be3 variation is to me better for Black each time Black will use a Fianchetto. And just for this slow move, I dislike it !

Dear GM, what I think is that your opponent facilitates you to demonstrate you choose the good defense. But... certainly 6.f3, 6.c3, 6.Nh3 and 6.Ne2 have to be preferred ! Geigel made a too slow move according to me due to the wish to make long castling. And what we see in your game is that your Knight succeded alone to punish both Bc4 and Be3 to play inaccurately... and to protect the pawn more.

And much better, your opponent surprisingly decided to win pawns on the white shelter side, where your pieces can react with energy quickly. The Queen trap is finally just for fun. But yes at this moment white was already lost.

I am sorry, but I cannot accept to let Black thinking it is a bad opening for white only by this game. White has misunderstood the opening... from almost the starting of the game !!! White didn't plan as he must have to do. His rated level was nice (to me) but he was maybe impressed by having first started such a tournament by the future winner !
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3101
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #7 - 07/19/12 at 10:23:02
Post Tools
Glenn Snow wrote on 07/19/12 at 03:35:07:
I thought 5.Bf4 e6 6.Qd2 (6.f3 Bd6; 6.Ne2 c5) 6...c5! was supposed to be at least a little better for Black.

I'm inclined to agree. Anyway, it was strange to play a game with Black where I thought I was equal after move two, and better after move three! Huh
I suppose that must be due to reading so many of Eric's updates - curiously he was also playing in this tournament but defaulted the first round because of a marriage (not his own).
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Glenn Snow
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1710
Location: Franklin
Joined: 09/27/03
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #6 - 07/19/12 at 03:35:07
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 07/17/12 at 07:14:02:
I think White misplayed the opening. These days,      after 1 d4 Nf6 2 Nc3 d5 3 e4 Nxe4 4 Nxe4 dxe4 5 Bf4  should be played. The 5 Bc4 line is too well-known and analyzed. On the other hand, 5 Bf4 stops the pesky ...e5 maneuver and prepares f2-f3 in some lines. 


What about the 5.Be3 variation?  I thought 5.Bf4 e6 6.Qd2 (6.f3 Bd6; 6.Ne2 c5) 6...c5! was supposed to be at least a little better for Black.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ghenghisclown
God Member
*****
Offline


Pedicare Vestri Latin

Posts: 1022
Location: HollyWeird
Joined: 07/19/06
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #5 - 07/18/12 at 07:37:38
Post Tools
GMTonyKosten wrote on 07/14/12 at 11:06:31:
In the first round of the Montpellier Masters I was Black against the Hubsch:



Of course his 16th move is a bad blunder, but he is losing anyway. I had dinner with IM Didier Collas afterwards and he told me that he played this line all the time when he was young, and felt that White could equalise with correct play.


NICE game! Almost wish it came with a Maurice Ashley play by play...
  

"Experience is a dim lamp, which only lights the one who bears it."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1387
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #4 - 07/17/12 at 07:14:02
Post Tools
I think White misplayed the opening. These days,      after 1 d4 Nf6 2 Nc3 d5 3 e4 Nxe4 4 Nxe4 dxe4 5 Bf4  should be played. The 5 Bc4 line is too well-known and analyzed. On the other hand, 5 Bf4 stops the pesky ...e5 maneuver and prepares f2-f3 in some lines.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3101
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #3 - 07/14/12 at 11:06:31
Post Tools
In the first round of the Montpellier Masters I was Black against the Hubsch:



Of course his 16th move is a bad blunder, but he is losing anyway. I had dinner with IM Didier Collas afterwards and he told me that he played this line all the time when he was young, and felt that White could equalise with correct play.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Eric Diemerophile
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 05/11/10
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #2 - 06/24/12 at 20:10:33
Post Tools
Hi

I would be very happy to read you soon at ejego@sfr.fr
Let me know Shocked)

Best - Eric
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1387
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #1 - 06/11/12 at 03:50:10
Post Tools
Thank you. Fortunately, I have the old 40-page Huebsch Gambit pamphlet. I will buy your book, since the old pamphlet is now out-of-date.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Eric Diemerophile
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 05/11/10
Hübsch Gambit Vs. Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
06/10/12 at 09:43:24
Post Tools
Hello

Two years since my adventure in writing has emerged with the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit, Modus Operandi. The main defenses against this aggressive opening were shelled, with the motto "get to the point": analysis of 287 games and assimilation of the mechanisms behind this opening. An English translation also followed.

Today marks an important moment in my work, and learning this incredible opening. Looked at more closely, one book dedicated to the Hübsch Gambit existed. 40 pages co-written by Rasmus Pape, Niels Jorgen Jensen and Dietrich Burk is out of stock for many years. Although many books dedicated to the BDG approach, none offers a comprehensive line ... and this defense is yet known for refuting the BDG.

Thus I looked for a whole year on it to bring you today's study. You'll find 122 games shelled in a more accomplished than my previous works. You will be guided through the different variants, accompanied by an introduction and a conclusion of each chapter.

You like the Method of Operating of the BDG, do not be hesitant with it, treat yourself! You hesitate for even more educational format you need, there is no doubt that the plans and ideas that are put forward will convince you. You use it ... but as black, be sure you are not forgotten, the gambit of this study was conducted objectively. You are fans of gambits, this book in French will please you. You doubt the validity of the BDG or Hübsch Gambit, tell yourself that you can allow 11 transpositions to face these openings (Caro-Kann, French, Veresov, Trompowsky, Scandinavian, English ...), also have available this book could help!

This book of 124 pages dedicated to the Hübsch Gambit will bring the expected answers on the supposed refutation established in the BDG. But beware, 2012 will be the only year you find my 3 books because my adventure as a self-editor will take end! You can see an extract via my bookstore http://gambit-blackmar-diemer.cabanova.fr/ !

Hope to read you
Eric le Diemerophile
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo