(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › 1. e4 e5 - Non-Spanish › Kings Gambit › C30: KGD (split from Petrov thread)
(Moderators: trw, Smyslov_Fan, Jupp53)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
Normal Topic C30: KGD (split from Petrov thread) (Read 6630 times)
HgMan
God Member
*****
Offline


Demand me nothing: What
you know, you know

Posts: 2330
Location: Up on Cripple Creek
Joined: 11/09/04
Gender: Male
Re: C30: KGD (split from Petrov thread)
Reply #4 - 11/28/14 at 01:51:39
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 01/13/14 at 21:45:22:

This game illustrates the dangers pretty well:

Dubuc,S (2448) - Egan,M (2164) [C30]
KE64 Canadian Championship (CCCA) - 200 ICCF, 07.01.2008


1–0

The line is from Renet.


Yikes! Not my finest hour. If memory serves, I was drawing on the first edition of Marin's Beating the Open Games for inspiration and information. It made no mention of 10.Qd2. I still remember the horror of discovering the problems associated with 10.Qd2 on these forums, just as I'd played 9...Qd6. 11...Nd7 (TN) is not the right way to play.

Curiously, I'm revisiting this line, but from White's side.
  
"Luck favours the prepared mind."  --Louis Pasteur
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10758
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: C30: KGD (split from Petrov thread)
Reply #3 - 01/14/14 at 09:33:48
Post Tools
Nightingale,D (2500) - Cerrato,R (2448)
WS/GMN/034 ICCF, 02.05.2012


1-0

« Last Edit: 01/14/14 at 14:06:16 by Smyslov_Fan »  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: C42-C43 The Petrov for the rest of your chess life
Reply #2 - 01/14/14 at 02:42:34
Post Tools
I understand the reasons for splitting this thread, but there are enough comments that would belong in both hypothetical threads to leave this as a single thread for now.

Having said that, please discuss the King's Gambit lines in threads devoted to the King's Gambit.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pale Horse, Pale Rider
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 287
Joined: 12/26/12
Re: C30: King's Gambit Declined (split from Petrov)
Reply #1 - 01/13/14 at 22:26:35
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 01/13/14 at 21:45:22:

Yes, 2...d5 3.Nf3 exf4.


Wink

MNb wrote on 01/13/14 at 21:45:22:

This game illustrates the dangers pretty well:

Dubuc,S (2448) - Egan,M (2164) [C30]
KE64 Canadian Championship (CCCA) - 200 ICCF, 07.01.2008


Thanks for the fast reply. Very convincing game Shocked ... I guess I need to get access to a good database in order to figure stuff like this out myself. If I may bother you, I'd be interested if there are any recent high level games featuring 11...fxe4 as recommended by Marin and Cohen. Basically the line that was discussed in the review.
« Last Edit: 01/14/14 at 14:05:37 by Smyslov_Fan »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10758
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
C30: KGD (split from Petrov thread)
01/13/14 at 21:45:22
Post Tools
Pale Horse, Pale Rider wrote on 01/13/14 at 19:43:28:
I wonder if black has no impovements up to this point in the KGD.

Yes, 2...d5 3.Nf3 exf4.

Pale Horse, Pale Rider wrote on 01/13/14 at 19:43:28:
The computer seems to love 11...Nd7 here, with the possiblity of retaken with the d7 knight in case of 12. fxe5 and the idea 12. f5 Nb6. Black's kingside seems to become a little shaky in the later case but it doesn't look so scary. But maybe I'm too much computer influenced (sloughterized so to say) here and this just rubbish. Any thoughts?


This game illustrates the dangers pretty well:

Dubuc,S (2448) - Egan,M (2164) [C30]
KE64 Canadian Championship (CCCA) - 200 ICCF, 07.01.2008


1–0

The line is from Renet.
« Last Edit: 01/14/14 at 14:07:40 by Smyslov_Fan »  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge