Keano wrote on 03/04/14 at 09:56:47:
No doubt a comp could defend it, but I'd fancy my chances there against a human opponent.
If White prefers not to sacrifice anything he can go for the other line:
33.fxe5 Rh7 34.Rh1 Rxh1 35.Rxh1 Re6 36.b3 b5 37.Ke3! Rc6 38.bxc4 Rxc4 39.Kd2 Rc7 40.Bd1 Be6 41.Bf3 White is better in the endgame.
41...Rh7 swapping rooks here leads to a lost endgame, this illustrates the possibilities:
42.Rxh7 Kxh7 43.Kc2 g5 44.Kb3 a5 45.a4 bxa4+ 46.Kxa4 Kg6 47.Kxa5 White wins
The beauty is he has so many promising lines to choose from. In fact the more we look the more I think it may be even more than just a slight edge, but in any case White should be happy with a slight edge that is safe as the result of any opening.
You say that as to infer we should be naive to believe White has not been using a comp to play the white side in this discussion.
What I have shown is the ideas. Once you play the ideas out, like you would even from an opening book, you start remembering the ideas too.
White has been using a comp too, AND, it has been clear that White has had to defend many times, and yes, playing with a comp as white is "easy", just to make sure he does not get horribly tied down, and yet, in some lines, even with the help of a comp, he does get tied down, I have shown that already.
There has been nothing nowhere, not in all the lines I have challenged, where White ends up better, a computer evaluations is not precise, but I have shown that too. In face I have seen that a lot while going over these lines.
I will check if I have not covered the fxe5 line already.
But so far all the doors keep closing on white, and you are running out of options. But you keep believing white is better. If White was truly better, the doors should be closing on Black at that rate, but not the other way around.