My experience shows a limitation in Richard Pert newbk (2013) on the Trompovsky.
1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 Ne4 3.Bf4 c5 4.f3 Qa5+ 5.c3 Nf6 6.d5 Qb67.e4 Qxb2 8.Nd2 Qxc3 9.Bc7 g6
Here I looked forward to exploring the detailed analysis of a newish gambit Richard Pert recommends He quotes the line
“9...g6?! was played in the first game in this
line, but it doesn’t seem to work and it has
rarely been tried since: 10.¦c1 £e3† 11.¤e2
¤a6 12.¤c4 £h6 13.¥f4 £g7 14.£a4 g5
15.¥e5 g4 16.f4 £g6 17.¤g3± Chernyshov
– Grischuk, Dagomys 2005; Black is totally
passive and White’s advantage is significant.”
However I got a shock when I realised that Black has a much stronger continuation which is to play d7-d6 soonest; this cuts of the bishop on c7 from kingside. White has sacked 2 pawns and needs sth v clear otherwise black’s piece coordination is unproblematic and can develop, consolidate and win with the two pawns.
|Here are some typical lines f/ SCID using Stockfish (not latest but gd enough 4 my humble purposes). 10 rc1 qe3ch 11 ne2 d6 12. Nc4qh6 13rb1 bg7 -.76
One SCID line shows need to check. After previous variation then 13. Qb3 na6 14 ba5 nd7 15 bd2 qg7 16. Ng3 nc7 17. A4 rb8 18. Be2 b6 19.0-0 a6 20 rfd1 b5 21. Na5cvh c4 22. Qb1 qd4ch 23. Kh1 Qb6. 24 nc6 ra8. Given as -0.34. But wqhite can recapture one pawn 25. Ba5 qb2 followed by bc4: and white will recapture b5 pawn with a slight edge.
Chess is the tragedy of one move. If only one could get in f3-f4 and e5.
Any ideas?