Latest Updates:
Poll
Poll Question: Whats the most solid/quiet/positional variation of the KID?



« Created by: Marc Benford on: 06/23/14 at 20:34:48 »
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Good books about the KID from White's perspective? (Read 18871 times)
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 866
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #32 - 06/27/14 at 19:37:07
Post Tools
If Black doesn't want to play a Kings Indian with .. e5, you really cannot stop him. The Gruenfeld isn't possible after 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 and some players have used the order 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. e4 Bg7 4. d4 to even further discourage it.

Whilst the Petrosian system, both in the traditional form and the modern alternatives attempts to clamp down on the f5 break, it's going to happen eventually, even if played under favourable circumstances for White. Any player who doesn't feel able to play that type of position will eventually have to abandon 1. d4 2. c4 typical positions as it's a position that many variations eventually lead to.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2014
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #31 - 06/27/14 at 18:15:57
Post Tools
Black can't avoid the position after 4 Nf3 in the classical can he? The first few black moves are so non commital that he can play in all sorts of ways vs any of the plausible white set ups Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Marc Benford
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 89
Joined: 07/17/13
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #30 - 06/27/14 at 17:52:21
Post Tools
Thank you all for your answers.

Okay so I can eliminate the Gligoric System 7.Be3 for sure.

What's worrying me about the Petrosian System 7.d5 and the Exchange Variation 7.dxe5 dxe5 8.Qxd8 Rxd8 is that Black has so many ways to avoid them completely:

After 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. Nc3 Black can try 4...d5 or 4...c5 or 4...O-O 5. e4 c6 6. Be2 d5 or 4...O-O 5. e4 c5

And most importantly, after 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2, Black doesn't have to play 6...e5, he has so many possibilites to deviate: 6...c5, 6...Nbd7, 6...Na6, 6...Nc6, 6...c6, 6...Bg4

But on the other hand Black has no way to avoid the Fianchetto Variation 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.g3

And there's something I find bad about the Petrosian System 7.d5 : it doesn't look to be that much solid/quiet/positional... It does possess the name of the most solid/quiet/positional/drawish player of all time, but it seems to still look like the Mar Del Plata (which everyone said is extremely sharp and tactical) except that the Black queenside Knight has a different journey.
I've seen some games with live commentary on Youtube which featured the Petrosian Sytem of the KID, and Black got very big and scary Kingside attacks against the poor White King who got slaughtered in most of them...

The only downside of the Fianchetto Variation of the KID is that in my entire opening repertoire I never use any fianchetto (so I was thinking that since I don't play any fianchetto I will get very familiarized/accustomed to positions without any fianchetto, and should therefore not aim for anything with a fianchetto).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OrangeCounty
Full Member
***
Offline


You played that like it
was a good move!

Posts: 171
Joined: 05/26/10
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #29 - 06/26/14 at 23:23:49
Post Tools
barnaby wrote on 06/26/14 at 19:41:25:
For white, one tip in the main lines of the Mar del Plata is that the bishops are better defenders of the kingside than are the knights.  Send the knights off to raid the queenside and keep the bishops ready to cover the holes on the kingside.

Get Black's white-square bishop off the board and live longer.

Playing the main lines as White with 9. Ne1 is seriously fun chess and should not be missed.

Smiley


Agree with this, although the Ne1-d3-f2 maneuver is a standby.  In the Ne1 Mar Del Plata, as White, Nd3-f2 is almost always the move I play if, for whatever reason, I can't decide what to do next on the queenside.  It's always fun to win the game with a Black knight sitting uselessly on the g3 square not doing anything.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby
Senior Member
****
Offline


The night is dark and
full of terrors.

Posts: 345
Joined: 01/09/12
Gender: Female
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #28 - 06/26/14 at 19:41:25
Post Tools
For white, one tip in the main lines of the Mar del Plata is that the bishops are better defenders of the kingside than are the knights.  Send the knights off to raid the queenside and keep the bishops ready to cover the holes on the kingside.

Get Black's white-square bishop off the board and live longer.

Playing the main lines as White with 9. Ne1 is seriously fun chess and should not be missed.

Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #27 - 06/26/14 at 08:28:59
Post Tools
Straggler wrote on 06/26/14 at 07:47:05:
I did wonder about the Fianchetto. Others have suggested that it's too subtle for the likes of me, but I gather that Wojo's Weapons explains it quite well.

I noticed that in this thread BPaulsen suggested the Gligoric: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1226348173/135. Apparently it's good for White if Black just aims for the standard kingside attack, which at my level many people will. In fact, at my level the most effective lines are probably those that offer the best chances if neither player knows much theory!


I still think the Gligoric a good choice, and happen to have a higher opinion of it now than I did even in 2010 when I recommended it.

To answer a question someone asked me in that thread, but that I never saw until now (I don't feel like bumping it):

Michael Ayton wrote on 02/18/10 at 18:37:16:
Very interesting, BPaulsen -- your inspiring write-up has encouraged me to take a look at this.

What is your take on 7 ...Na6, when Golubev recommends transposition to E94 with 8 0-0? And how should White meet 7 ...Nbd7? -- 8 d5, or 8 de de 9 Nd2 perhaps? (I don't really want to run into trendy Dembo stuff, esp. as I might give this a punt as Black!)


7...Na6 and 7...Nbd7 should both be met by 8.0-0, in my opinion. Black has already announced he doesn't intend to mate you, so there is no reason to continue delaying it.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Straggler
Senior Member
****
Online



Posts: 360
Joined: 08/09/09
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #26 - 06/26/14 at 07:47:05
Post Tools
I did wonder about the Fianchetto. Others have suggested that it's too subtle for the likes of me, but I gather that Wojo's Weapons explains it quite well.

I noticed that in this thread BPaulsen suggested the Gligoric: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1226348173/135. Apparently it's good for White if Black just aims for the standard kingside attack, which at my level many people will. In fact, at my level the most effective lines are probably those that offer the best chances if neither player knows much theory!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OrangeCounty
Full Member
***
Offline


You played that like it
was a good move!

Posts: 171
Joined: 05/26/10
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #25 - 06/25/14 at 22:25:07
Post Tools
Straggler wrote on 06/25/14 at 12:28:45:
True, but it doesn't follow that such a person will have any clear idea of what lines would suit him or her. I, for example, have been playing for many years and am around 1800. My general knowledge about the KID is that if you play the best lines (with d5) and don't know the theory you will quickly get mated. So, when I have found myself facing the KID in the past, I have tended to play rubbish like the London or the Barry. I want to start playing respectable lines without having to memorise a huge wad of theory. But my knowledge of the various lines is quite inadequate to enable me to make an informed choice. Call me ignorant if you like, but I don't think I'm unusual in this respect. Actually I seem to know more theory than most of my opponents.

Incidentally I have a particular problem with lines that don't involve an early Nf3: what do you do about 1.d4 d6, or (especially) 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 d6?


The problem with the KID generally (for White) is that unless you are willing to play something critical (and almost everything is) then you are accepting equality out of the box; that's what the KID is for, after all: trying to get White to commit to come home with his shield, or upon it.  So there isn't any remotely challenging variation that doesn't involve some risk.

However, there are certainly less risky lines than the Mar Del Plata; I suggested the Petrosian, but many of the lines with h2-h3 and / or the Averbakh have a similar plan of restraining Black on the kingside rather than inviting him forward.  And that probably means less risk of getting mated.

If you want to avoid the locked pawn centers of the KID main lines, the Fianchetto is probably your best bet.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10592
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #24 - 06/25/14 at 17:04:09
Post Tools
Straggler wrote on 06/25/14 at 12:28:45:
I want to start playing respectable lines without having to memorise a huge wad of theory.

There are a couple of options: 5.Bd3, 6.Nge2 (Seirawan) or 5.Nf3, 6.h3. I tried both, but they didn't really suit me.  So I chose 5.h3, 6.Bg5 which can be played against the Benoni as well and scores excellently in practice. It demands preparation of course. In another corr. game of mine, which actually began via the KID, I played 10.Nge2 iso 10.Nf3 (see previous page) as I was too lazy to find out which one was best. After 10.Nge2 I barely scraped a draw.

Straggler wrote on 06/25/14 at 12:28:45:
Incidentally I have a particular problem with lines that don't involve an early Nf3: what do you do about 1.d4 d6, or (especially) 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 d6?

Recently I met someone whom I suspected to play the Lion and eventually the Philidor. So I followed Schandorff's recommendation 1.d4 d6 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e5 4.d5 Nbd7 5.e4 Nc5 6.f3. Black can't transpose well to the KID anymore after 4.d5. While I have my doubts - Schandorff is quite optimistic imo - I managed to win a nice game; Black had 100 ELO points more.
I prefer my games sharp with me having the initiative. If you're risk averse you better turn to 1.e4 imo.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Straggler
Senior Member
****
Online



Posts: 360
Joined: 08/09/09
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #23 - 06/25/14 at 12:28:45
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 06/23/14 at 21:39:33:
But here's a kind of thing I continue to wonder:  if you have reached even 1800 in something like USCF or FIDE, do you not have some general knowledge about, and inclination/disinclination towards, various openings/variations arising from, for example, studying a variety of annotated games?  Instead it seems to be all, Opening Explorer says this, Houdini says that, Wikipedia says ...

True, but it doesn't follow that such a person will have any clear idea of what lines would suit him or her. I, for example, have been playing for many years and am around 1800. My general knowledge about the KID is that if you play the best lines (with d5) and don't know the theory you will quickly get mated. So, when I have found myself facing the KID in the past, I have tended to play rubbish like the London or the Barry. I want to start playing respectable lines without having to memorise a huge wad of theory. But my knowledge of the various lines is quite inadequate to enable me to make an informed choice. Call me ignorant if you like, but I don't think I'm unusual in this respect. Actually I seem to know more theory than most of my opponents.

Incidentally I have a particular problem with lines that don't involve an early Nf3: what do you do about 1.d4 d6, or (especially) 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 d6?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 866
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #22 - 06/25/14 at 12:13:04
Post Tools
OrangeCounty wrote on 06/25/14 at 00:36:32:
  My point is that trundling forward with pawns is nowhere near good enough to play the main lines of the Mar Del Plata and similar. 


If the original poster allows the Kings Indian, at some point in the game he's going to have to get his hands dirty with some tactical calculation. It's unpleasant as in the Mal del Plata to know that you get mated if you get it wrong. The Gligoric, Petrosian and Finachetto variations do at least have the advantage, if you can call it such, that it won't be until later in the game that Black will come gunning for you down the f and g files. The h3 systems might be worth considering. It's not a quiet game, but when the threat of .. f5 has been met by g4 and you can still go long with the King, it's Black, not White threatened with disaster on the g file.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OrangeCounty
Full Member
***
Offline


You played that like it
was a good move!

Posts: 171
Joined: 05/26/10
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #21 - 06/25/14 at 00:36:32
Post Tools
I played a Black game last month where the line 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4 e4 d6 5 Nf3 0-0 6 Be2 e5 7 0-0 Nc6 8 d5 Ne7 etc., appeared on the board, with White playing 14 moves of perfect theory and then utterly losing the plot after a long think on the very next move.  I think it must have been 9 Nd2, because White played b4, c5, and cxd6 in some order and the move that occurred after the long think was b4-b5.

I crashed through on the kingside in short order.  My point is that trundling forward with pawns is nowhere near good enough to play the main lines of the Mar Del Plata and similar.  White can and will get rocked every time unless he plans his attack clearly from the beginning; you can't exchange pawns on d6 and then start thinking about what to do next.

I still think White is probably better in these lines - despite being a KID player myself who allows them - but the price of entry is a fair amount of work.  If you don't know all the different attacking structures on the queenside you can find yourself frozen out for much, much too long...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 866
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #20 - 06/24/14 at 16:43:37
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 06/24/14 at 16:21:04:
One of the main lines of the Exchange involves White changing the structure after 9. Bg5 Re8 (the traditional reply, but certainly not the only one) with 10. Nd5. 


I'd imagine boredom would set in fairly rapidly, but studying all the little tactics that can arise in the few moves after the central exchanges could be a practical weapon. It's not really strategic in the sense of any grand design, just trying to improve  White's position.

Whether that's actually a "solid/positional/quiet variation" as requested by the original poster is another matter as it can be hard work trying to find all the nuances in such positions. In main lines as White you can just trundle forward with pawns and only really need to calculate accurately on the final breakthrough, if at all.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4705
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #19 - 06/24/14 at 16:21:04
Post Tools
RdC wrote on 06/24/14 at 15:39:25:
As far as the Exchange variation is concerned, that's certainly slow, but experienced Kings Indian defenders will have methods of improving their position. One of them is that White having played e4 and c4 leaves the d4 square vulnerable whilst Black isn't so vulnerable on d5 by virtue of being able to play c6. So there are obvious plans of Bc8-g4xf3 and Nb8-d7-f8-e6-d4. I'm not sure of White's obvious plan for playing the ending.


One of the main lines of the Exchange involves White changing the structure after 9. Bg5 Re8 (the traditional reply, but certainly not the only one) with 10. Nd5.  (There is also 10. 0-0-0; I recall a game Nei-Tal in which after 10...h6 11. Be3 c6 12. Ne1 Be6, Edmar Mednis thought White would be slightly better with 13. Nc2 followed by Rd2 and Rhd1.)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 866
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #18 - 06/24/14 at 15:39:25
Post Tools
OrangeCounty wrote on 06/24/14 at 03:04:37:
(Really any answer other than "The Exchange Variation" is probably fine.)

But it doesn't matter.  At any level under about 2000, the value of a "normal" opening edge is nil, because the number of and severity of errors will probably swamp such a minor advantage anyway.  That means that it is a lot more important to be able to get something comfortable than to get something "good".


It's a characteristic of many Kings Indian positions that White will get and maintain an edge from the opening. The reason why it remains popular for Black at lower levels of skill is that it offers a lot of scope for White to lose control in the critical period between moves 20 and 40.

As far as the Exchange variation is concerned, that's certainly slow, but experienced Kings Indian defenders will have methods of improving their position. One of them is that White having played e4 and c4 leaves the d4 square vulnerable whilst Black isn't so vulnerable on d5 by virtue of being able to play c6. So there are obvious plans of Bc8-g4xf3 and Nb8-d7-f8-e6-d4. I'm not sure of White's obvious plan for playing the ending.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OrangeCounty
Full Member
***
Offline


You played that like it
was a good move!

Posts: 171
Joined: 05/26/10
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #17 - 06/24/14 at 03:04:37
Post Tools
I agree with the comments about rating levels and opening relevance throughout, but in answer to the original question, I think that the Petrosian variation probably fits the bill best, so that's how I answered the poll.

(Really any answer other than "The Exchange Variation" is probably fine.)

But it doesn't matter.  At any level under about 2000, the value of a "normal" opening edge is nil, because the number of and severity of errors will probably swamp such a minor advantage anyway.  That means that it is a lot more important to be able to get something comfortable than to get something "good".

[That said, I play the Catalan myself at just over 2000, so there it is.]
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bibs
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2237
Joined: 10/24/06
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #16 - 06/23/14 at 22:43:32
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 06/23/14 at 19:29:38:
I guess I'll go ahead and say that I find the idea of a 1500 player buying 1200 pages pertaining to such things as Catalans and Fianchetto KIDs pretty mind-boggling.

You are not the only one. Good grief. Catalan needs a lower rating limit attached. Say, 2400?
1500 level - forward, turn right. Open games would be better.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4705
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #15 - 06/23/14 at 21:39:33
Post Tools
Marc Benford wrote on 06/23/14 at 20:34:48:
I think I've said just yesterday on my other thread about 1.Nf3 that I'm 1800, not 1500.


I wasn't referring to you there.  But here's a kind of thing I continue to wonder:  if you have reached even 1800 in something like USCF or FIDE, do you not have some general knowledge about, and inclination/disinclination towards, various openings/variations arising from, for example, studying a variety of annotated games?  Instead it seems to be all, Opening Explorer says this, Houdini says that, Wikipedia says ...

Maybe it's a sign of the times.  Feel free to ignore me and set up your next poll about which line ranks highest in abstract attributes x, y and z or whatever.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Marc Benford
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 89
Joined: 07/17/13
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #14 - 06/23/14 at 20:34:48
Post Tools
It seems that instead of asking for a book that gives a solid/positional/quiet repertoire, I should have first maybe asked what solid/positional/quiet variation I should play.

Based on the previous answers, and some research that I made with the help of Wikipedia, here are the top choices for the most solid, positional, slow, strategic, quiet and closed variations:
- Gligoric System 7.Be3
- Petrosian System 7.d5
- Exchange Variation 7.dxe5 dxe5 8.Qxd8 Rxd8
- Fianchetto Variation: 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.g3
- Averbakh Variation: 5.Be2 0-0 6.Bg5
- Hungarian Variation: 5.Nge2
- Sämisch Variation: 5.f3

(maybe I've forgotten some, so don't hesitate to suggest me other variations)

But, someone pointed out something that I should have mentionned earlier: actually I want to be able to play this variation both by beginning with 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 and by beginning with 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4

So if I am not mistaken the Averbakh Variation does not fit this condition. (or is it somehow possible to play it by beginning with 1. Nf3 ?)

The same goes for the Hungarian Variation.

Someone pointed out the Sämisch Variation. But if I recall correctly, I read on Wikipedia that it was most of the time sharp and tactical, not what I am looking for. And it's also impossible to play this one by beginning with 1. Nf3

So we can eliminate these 3 variations.

There are only 4 variations left:
- Gligoric System 7.Be3
- Petrosian System 7.d5
- Exchange Variation 7.dxe5 dxe5 8.Qxd8 Rxd8
- Fianchetto Variation: 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.g3

So which one of these 4 variations tends to lead (on average) to the most solid, positional, slow, strategic, quiet and closed positions?

I also made a poll. But I still prefer true written answers over simple votes =)




Edit:
Quote:
I guess I'll go ahead and say that I find the idea of a 1500 player buying 1200 pages pertaining to such things as Catalans and Fianchetto KIDs pretty mind-boggling.
I think I've said just yesterday on my other thread about 1.Nf3 that I'm 1800, not 1500.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4705
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #13 - 06/23/14 at 19:29:38
Post Tools
I guess I'll go ahead and say that I find the idea of a 1500 player buying 1200 pages pertaining to such things as Catalans and Fianchetto KIDs pretty mind-boggling.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #12 - 06/23/14 at 19:23:06
Post Tools
RoleyPoley wrote on 06/23/14 at 19:00:51:
ErictheRed wrote on 06/23/14 at 05:07:15:
I think that Wojo's Weapons is an absolutely excellent didactic book.



Looking at reviews, and seeing your comments make me want to get these books...but the reviews suggest they are for playing strength above 1800+...would you ever recommend them to players below that level (and havent played those positions as white before?)


Absolutely, I think that anyone can learn from them.  They're very instructive, and personally I think that any serious student would benefit from them.  In fact they're probably better suited for players in the 1600-2000 rating range, and offer as much middlegame instruction as opening.  Though I know a lot of 2200+ players that could really use the middlegame instruction, as well.

Reminds me a bit of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U15QgTKHMJ8

GM Hungaski made what I think of as an elementary positional error in that game, and he was rated 2366 at the time.  I think that the Wojo's Weapons series are better suited as middlegame manuals than opening manuals, especially the one on the King's Indian.  You'll likely switch lines around later, but you'll get a very good grounding in how to play those positions in general, which is what the vast majority of players actually need (obsession with "theory" notwithstanding).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RoleyPoley
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 692
Location: London
Joined: 12/29/13
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #11 - 06/23/14 at 19:00:51
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 06/23/14 at 05:07:15:
I think that Wojo's Weapons is an absolutely excellent didactic book.



Looking at reviews, and seeing your comments make me want to get these books...but the reviews suggest they are for playing strength above 1800+...would you ever recommend them to players below that level (and havent played those positions as white before?)
  

"As Mikhail Tal would say ' Let's have a bit of hooliganism! '"

Victor Bologan.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #10 - 06/23/14 at 16:34:32
Post Tools
One line that I have a serious soft spot for is:

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. O-O Nc6 8. d5 Ne7 9. Ne1 Nd7 10. f3 f5 11. g4


It's not as crazy as it looks, and basically aims to block up the kingside before Black can do any real damage there, then win on the queenside.  I think that Black has to be well prepared not to fall into a strategically terrible position, and even then the game is not usually as sharp as the Mar Del Plata or some other lines.  Here's one of the earlier games that shows the strategic idea in an ideal form:




This game was also critical in showing the viability of the system, i.e. that the pawn on g5 wasn't going to simply be lost without compensation:





As far as I know there is absolutely nothing wrong with this system, it's just not considered a critical try.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10592
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #9 - 06/23/14 at 16:14:29
Post Tools
nestor wrote on 06/23/14 at 08:17:30:
I quite like 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.h3,

So do I, but because it can become very sharp with White focusing on the right wing. Hence I disagree with

nestor wrote on 06/23/14 at 08:17:30:
would fit the OP's criteria pretty well.


MNb - Almarza Mato,C [E71]
ws H/329 ICCF, 28.08.2012
1-0

  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nestor
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 120
Location: London
Joined: 05/10/09
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #8 - 06/23/14 at 08:17:30
Post Tools
I quite like 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.h3, which is covered by John Watson, "A Strategic Chess Opening Repertoire for White". He offers two systems, based on 6.Be3 and 6.Bg5, which are designed to stifle Black's standard counterplay with ...f5. This book gives an overall repertoire based on 1.d4 and 2.c4, not just against the KID, of a type that would fit the OP's criteria pretty well.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #7 - 06/23/14 at 07:36:52
Post Tools
I recall Kaufman in 'The Kaufman Repertoire for Black and White' recommended 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 Nc6 8.Be3 as a way of avoiding the Mar del Plata, and it seems an especially effective choice at the amateur level (Black can equalise, but he has to be accurate and have a strong understanding of the structure after 8...Re8 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.h3). The only other sharp line for Black is 7...exd4, but in my view White gets a very comfortable advantage if he is well prepared there. I might add that one advantage of the Samisch and Fianchetto (two of the most solid answers to the KID) is that you can avoid the pure Grunfeld with 3.f3/3.g3. On the other hand, by choosing a line with Nf3, it makes life easy if you want to play a 1.Nf3 move order to avoid the Grunfeld, Nimzo and Queen's Indian.

The Averbakh is definitely a solid choice for White too. There is the Gligoric as well, where your king is generally very safe. Even the h3 systems are quite solid despite their sharp appearance as if you stop Black's ...f5 (which is the basic idea) it is very hard for Black to take the initiative.

There are lots of options for White that fit your criteria - I'd say the Samisch would be the easiest to understand for a club player. Quite a few of the above lines require a very strong overall chess understanding. Schandorff recommends it in his 'Beating the Indian Defences'.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #6 - 06/23/14 at 05:07:15
Post Tools
I think that Wojo's Weapons is an absolutely excellent didactic book.

P.s. posting from a mobile really sucks here for some reason.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


There is a crack in everything.

Posts: 3183
Joined: 11/07/06
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #5 - 06/23/14 at 00:55:11
Post Tools
P.S. As far as "solid, positional, slow, strategic, quiet and closed positions" goes, the Averbakh (5.Be2/6.Bg5) is the most solid of the ones I just mentioned. Though if you look at Kornev's book, you may want to consider the traditional 6...Na6 7.Qd2 or even 7.Qc2!? instead of his 7.f4.

The Fianchetto, covered by Avrukh, Wojo's Weapons and Lemos, is also clearly on the solid side. And the Classical can be played solidly, if you find something playable against 7...Nc6 that's not the Mar del Plata or the most irrational Bayonet positions.
  

Improvement begins at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


There is a crack in everything.

Posts: 3183
Joined: 11/07/06
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #4 - 06/22/14 at 21:38:10
Post Tools
Speaking of the Averbakh, this is also the recommendation in the very recent "A Practical White Repertoire with 1.d4 and 2.c4", Vol. 2, by Kornev. Apart from also covering lines against the Grünfeld, Modern, Pirc etc., it seems to fit the bill quite well. Though I notice that he gives the sharp 6...Na6 7.f4!?, so it's not all peace and quiet.

There's also lots of material out there on the Sämisch from White's point of view. I've been relying on the books by Ward and Svetushkin (the latter with a 3.f3 "Anti-Grünfeld" move order) - Sämisch positions really appeal to me, but I'm never sure if White gets any advantage objectively.

There's also an Anti-Grünfeld + Sämisch book out by GM/computer expert Larry Kaufmann covering much of the same ground as Svetushkin, but I haven't seen it yet.

Btw. "Easy guide to the Nge2 King's Indian" that was mentioned is a nice little book - I played that line for a while before I switched to the Sämisch and 4PA. Black has some annoying, but rare early ...h5 move orders that I never found anything I really liked against.
  

Improvement begins at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Maturin13
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 44
Joined: 01/02/05
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #3 - 06/22/14 at 20:49:02
Post Tools
Marc Benford wrote on 06/22/14 at 15:34:09:
Hello.

I am looking for good books about the Kings Indian Defense, but from the point of view of White only.

I would also prefer a repertoire book that tries to go into solid, positional, slow, strategic, quiet and closed positions. Not sharp and tactical ones.


Margeir Petursson, King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation. Not a repertoire book per se, but Petursson is clear about what he thinks are White's best lines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mangler
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 174
Location: Orlando
Joined: 10/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #2 - 06/22/14 at 17:46:37
Post Tools
Marc Benford wrote on 06/22/14 at 15:34:09:
I also found: Markos - Beat the KID. Clearly this one is from the point of view of White. But its title alone is driving me away from buying it: what if someone walked into my room and saw a book named "Beat the kid"...


I guess you would not be interested in a book featuring the 4 pawns attack by Semko Semkov called Kill the KID.

Wojo's book (mentioned by tony37) covers g3 vs the King's Indian.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tony37
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 616
Joined: 10/16/10
Re: Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
Reply #1 - 06/22/14 at 15:43:28
Post Tools
I think Wojo's Weapons, volume 2 (by Hilton & Ippolito) would be a good choice
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Marc Benford
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 89
Joined: 07/17/13
Good books about the KID from White's perspective?
06/22/14 at 15:34:09
Post Tools
Hello.

I am looking for good books about the Kings Indian Defense, but from the point of view of White only.

I would also prefer a repertoire book that tries to go into solid, positional, slow, strategic, quiet and closed positions. Not sharp and tactical ones.

I have already found some books, but I have no idea if they are from the point of view of White or Black, nor if they tend to be solid/quiet/positional or more aggressive:
- Panczyk, Ilczuk - The Classical King's Indian Uncovered
- Gligoric - King's Indian Defence, Mar del Plata Variation
- Forintos, Haag - Easy guide to the Nge2 King's Indian
- Gallagher - Starting Out : King's Indian

I also found: Markos - Beat the KID. Clearly this one is from the point of view of White. But its title alone is driving me away from buying it: what if someone walked into my room and saw a book named "Beat the kid"...

Thanks in advance for your answers.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo