Marc Benford wrote on 06/25/14 at 23:34:05:
- If possible, I would like that the repertoire tries to avoid playing the Pawn break ...f7-f6 (except when it's totally necessary).
I have been playing the French for more than fifteen years, all my chess career. And the pawn break f6 is a necessary part of Black's strategy in the majority of variations, according to modern theory. Without it, White is OK and we don't want that...
If you don't attack white center your position will be reduced to a passive defence. French Defence is not only a solid opening (it is, obviously) but a counterattacking one. Your CA appears not as quick as in the Sicilian but if you don't search for them... bad thing: packed with a bad bishop in a passive position, no space...
Another story is maybe you have seen some Advance variations where this f6 advance comes very very quickly, you get a lot of active chances but without this f-pawn on the board your king will feel a little unsecured, on even uncastled, resting in d7 or f7 squares, Queen on h5, bishop on d3... Risk vs reward.
John Watson advocates in his books for active measures against white center and space advantage, involving quick f6 in some lines. His "Play the French" series are like a Bible on the French, lots of possibilities for White covered, I think that books are the most complete in that way. But, I repeat, active ones, with lots of f6 breaks in his lines. By the way, French defence IS that sometimes.
Vitiugov and Antic&Maksimovic are more advanced books, their analysis are outstanding but with not a lot of explanations.
Finally, Ntirlis & Aagaard book "Playing the French" is maybe the most educational one. His analysis are not as exhaustives and "ad infinitum" as Vitiugov ones (the are very good already, of course) but the explanations of ideas and moves are simply superb. The lines Nikos advocates are classical enough that I think would sweet you the best according to your initial post. My reccomendation for you.
Salut,