RdC wrote on 08/04/14 at 14:10:00:
hicetnunc wrote on 08/04/14 at 13:38:57:
The main splitting points are where you develop your bishop (Bb2 or Bf4) and your Knight (Nd2 or Nc3).
Another one is whether you are intending to play e4. Usually that involves Nd2 and then Rd1 either before or after e4. Black doesn't have to take on e4 as being pushed back by e4-e5 may not be so bad.
Well, Bf4 does support some tactics later on, and is the recommendation in Wojo 1 and mentioned by Bologan as an interesting try. Even though it is usually reached following the bishop check on b4, in this exact position 8. Bf4 will transpose to one of Avrukh's lines. But I think the verdict is that White won't get an advantage with best play after that (there are e.g. some games by Tiviakov that look ok for Black).
After 8. Rd1 Ne4 9. b3 f5 10. Ba3, White gets to exchange the dark-squared bishops, true, but I am not sure Black is worse. The rook has nothing to do on d1 in this structure. I have played the line as White, but after 10 ...Bxa3 11. Nxa3, IIRC, Black will manage to play either ....c5 or ...e5 before White can get the knight back into play.
I fully agree that the knight should be on c3 in many cases, the tactics often work in White's favour. In this particular position, Avrukh recommends 8. Nbd2 (p. 188 in GM1), although as mentioned, by transposition, Avrukh also gives 8. Bf4 by transposition (p. 157 in GM1).
And as we both have mentioned, 8. Nbd2 means a totally different type of strategy, as White is committed to playing 9. e4 if he wants to achieve an advantage.