I didn't mean to pick on that particular thread. I meant more that if we are to have the subfora (I suppose that's the right word?), then we need to be strict and consistent, otherwise it defeats the purpose of having them. 

ErictheRed wrote on 01/25/18 at 21:27:41:


That's a problem, I suppose some of the Moderators aren't coming here as often as they should, I'll have a look at it.

I'm somewhat against the subforums, as we've discussed before.  A bigger problem is that newer threads have not consistently been started in the proper subforum, so the organization isn't really being followed anyway. There is a thread in the 1.d4 d5 2.c4 forum called "QGD vs Ragozin;" shouldn't that be in the QGD Mainline subforums?

Then there are threads that straddle the line between different subforums because of transpositional possibilities or because people became interested in a slightly different but related opening.

I appreciate the effort that was put into the change, but prefer the old layout, myself.

chk wrote on 01/13/15 at 08:38:24:


Seeley wrote on 01/14/15 at 23:18:41:


I'm glad, it was worth all the effort if it makes the Forum more useful for the members.

It is useful imo - thanks for the effort

TonyRo wrote on 01/12/15 at 01:18:00:


Yes, and no-one even moaned about it.

GMTonyKosten wrote on 09/16/14 at 21:42:12:


I must say I did expect a bigger reaction to such a significant change!