As fart as I know, the main difference with playing the g3 system between 1. c4 and 1. Cf3 is that which one feels more comfortable with: 1. c4 e5 or 1. Cf3 d5 2. c4 d4. I prefer White in both, so in this case it does not matter to me.
Stigma wrote on 12/10/17 at 07:50:49:
There's a Réti repertoire for White by Demuth soon (reportedly) to be published:
Says 22.12.2017 now. So probably not going to be able to get it until early next year. But I did see one of Demuth's articles in NIC Yearbook 123 about 1. Cf3 d5 2. c4 d4. Between 1. c4 e5 and that line, the latter is less analysed, so maybe good for avoiding heavy theory.
TD wrote on 12/10/17 at 09:33:49:
eti - a repertoire for White - Bologan (ChessBase 2017, DVD)
Has anyone tried this DVD and how are the lines?
TD wrote on 12/10/17 at 09:33:49:
Reti-Eroffnung, richtig gespielt - Konikowski & Bekemann (Beyer 2015)
I have never heard of this book before, is this more of an overview book?
TD wrote on 12/10/17 at 09:33:49:
Reti-Eroffnung, ein modernes Repertoire - Breutigam (ChessBase 2015, DVD)
Would it be recommended getting this and Bologan's, or just one of them?
TN wrote on 12/10/17 at 09:09:17:
I noticed after Marin wrote his Grandmaster Repertoire series, he started using the 1.Nf3/2.g3 move order regularly. So you may well look at his games while searching for that dream source.
So in this case, avoiding the complications from 1. Cf3 d5 2. c4? That sounds interesting, especially if it saves time if Black players prefer to transpose to light square systems that would in other ways be by 1. c4 c6 or 1. c4 e6.