Quote:To be honest, my first reaction is: why would anyone buy this rather than Sielecki's "Keep it Simple 1.e4" and get a full e4 repertoire to boot.
Well obviously Fishbein has a lot more material on the Exchange French: Fishbein 240 pages vs Sielecki 43 pages. Since the page sizes are different, I randomly selected two consecutive pages for each author to compare:
Author/page moves words diagrams
Fishbein/140 83 233 2
Fishbein/141 47 85 4
Sielecki/252 54 244 2
Sielecki/253 36 242 3 I compared Fishbein to Sielecki in the, in my opinion, important 4...Nc6 variation. It's a bit of a difference. Sielecki doesn't analyze 11...Be6 at all. Fishbein analyzes only 11...Be6. When I read Sielecki I was hesitant about this line with 5.Bb5 Bd6 6.c4 dxc4 7.d5, and reading Fishbein reinforces my hesitation. Unfortunately, Sielecki offers white no help if this line does not lead anywhere. Fishbein gives some alternatives, and although I'm not convinced white has anything in those lines either, at least white is not stuck playing the exact same nothing position every time.
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.Nf3 Nc6
5.Bb5 Quote:This is the only testing move. White needs to have something concrete against ...Bd6 / ...Nge7. A lame move like 5.Bd3 leads nowhere after 5...Bg4.
--Sielecki pg.252
Quote:John Watson convincingly shows that the line with Bf1-b5 and the trade on c6 (sic) gives white nothing. We will propose three other ways of playing against ...Nc6.
--Fishbein pg.163
- 5.c3 Bd6 6.Bd3 Nge7 7.O-O Bg4 8.Re1 Qd7 9.Nbd2 O-O-O { ?! --Fishbein pg.176 }
( 9...O-O Fressinet - Short, World rapid ch, Riadh 2017 --Fishbein pg.180-182 (game74))
10.b4 Ng6 Thavandiran - So, PRO League 2019 (1/2, 53) --Fishbein pg.176-178 (game 72)
( 10...Rde8 Stojchev - Jacimovic, Struga 2012 (1/2, 18) --Fishbein pg.178-179 (game73) RR Fishbein says white was winning in the final position. ) - 5.Nc3!? Bg4
( 5...Bb4 6.Bd3 transposes to chapter 10 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.exd5 exd5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Nf3 --Fishbein pg.183 )
6.Bb5 Ne7 Hovhannisyan - Grigoryan, Yerevan 2015 (1:0, 37) --Fishbein pg.183-185 (game 75)
( 6...Nf6 (by transposition) Fischer - Petrosian, c final (9), Buenos Aires 1971 (1:0,46) --Fishbein pg.185-186 (game 76) ) - 5.h3!? Fishbein - Shetty, World Open, Arlington 2014 (1:0, 33) --Fishbein pg.186-189 (game 77)
5...Bd6 6.c4 dxc4 7.d5 a6 8.Ba4 b5 9.dxc6 bxa4 10.O-O Ne7 11.Qxa4 11.Nbd2
Quote:This is not yet popular, but it is better than 11.Qa4. I think that white retains a small edge after this move. It is nothing special, but it's the kind of position you will win sometimes and should never lose. After already having completed my analysis I noticed that Axel Smith recommends the same approach in his _e3 Poison_ book - an additional stamp of approval.
--Sielecki pg.253.
4...Nc6 is better in comparison (to 4...Bg4), but I still feel that rather white is calling the shots here. Make sure to study this line until the end. It is usually chosen by theoretically prepared people who will know more than just up to move 11.
--Sielecki pg.255
Quote:A more subtle move order is 11.Nbd2, and here John Watson's prescription of 11...Be6! is effective ...
--Fishbein pg.167
Position after 11.Nbd2
11...Be6 analysis to move 18 (=) and in parenthesis quoting Davletbayeva - X.Zhang, Asian Continental women's 2015 to move 16 (=) --Fishbein pg.167
(
11...c3 quoting Meier - Bluebaum, Dresden 2017 to move 18 (+=) --Sielecki pg.253-254 (variation B1) )
(
11...O-O analysis to move 16 (+=) --Sielecki pg.254 (variation B2) )
11...O-O 11...Rb8 Turova - Rajlich, Budapest 2005 (0:1, 38) --Fishbein pg.167-169 (game 68)
12.Nbd2 Gelfand - Alekseev, World rapid ch, St Petersburg 2018 (1:0, 32) --Fishbein pg.165-167 (game67)
12.Qxc4 Kasparov - Bareev, rapid, Paris 1991 (1:0, 46) --Fishbein pg.163-165 (game 66)