Latest Updates:
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Stockfish suing ChessBase (Read 5212 times)
batista
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 12/10/22
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #23 - 12/10/22 at 10:50:14
Post Tools
I have been a light staff individual from liches for a long time now, and two things constantly stun me:

1. What limited number of individuals really comprehend the GNU Overall population Permit?
2. The number of individuals that really do/ought to comprehend the GPL decide to overlook it for their own benefit.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
batista
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 12/10/22
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #22 - 12/10/22 at 10:47:02
Post Tools
ChessBase is plainly and straightforwardly disregarding the GPL permit, so I wouldn't believe in the event that Group Stockfish DIDN'T win.

The primary "issue" I believe is whether there is truly a method for suing for harm, or the outcome will simply be a "Presently you Truly must quit conveying it" coming in, with CB getting to stash all that they've defrauded up until this point

Maybe the primary harm caused to CB after this will/ought to be various individuals having less upright predicaments about procuring their items by means of dodgy Russian locales, as opposed to Amazon
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IsaVulpes
Senior Member
****
Offline


No.

Posts: 345
Joined: 12/09/07
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #21 - 06/23/22 at 16:08:14
Post Tools
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1819
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #20 - 07/26/21 at 06:40:14
Post Tools
Technical speaking its not a complete recreation since Stockfish 14 uses both Lc0 genererated data and Stockfish vs Stockfish generated data while Fat Fritz 2 uses mainly Lc0 data, with the Fat Fritz 1 network further trained plus a few data from top level human games where one can argue if human games are improvments or not..
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
an ordinary chessplayer
God Member
*****
Offline


I used to be not bad.

Posts: 1637
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)
Joined: 01/02/15
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #19 - 07/25/21 at 19:10:10
Post Tools
Pawnpusher wrote on 07/25/21 at 10:42:45:
I think that CB was absolutely wrong but Bragesjo is on point that Stockfish 14 does use the FF2 ideas of larger net and LcO based data to create that net. Irony at the least.

There may have been legal advantages to replicating the Fat Fritz 2 changes. When they testify that the changes made were trivial, that testimony will be based on fact rather than opinion. That one seems to be a solid advantage. Another potential legal advantage I have thought of maybe is a little less solid, so I won't add any more speculation here.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1819
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #18 - 07/25/21 at 15:57:43
Post Tools
The idea is a bit more complicated than one can think. Stockfish original  network was based on pure Stockfish vs Stockfish games and using Lc0 data is using data created by an other engine. Its not uniqe either. As I understand there are even Lc0 clones that only learned from other engines vs other engines matches. And some Lc0 clones based on human games at Lichess.

Stockfish Team first thougt of larger network as a no gain approach so its not that simple. A larger network and combined with Lc0 data might have been created anyway but no one knows for shure.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jupp53
God Member
*****
Offline


be

Posts: 988
Location: Frankfurt/Main
Joined: 01/04/09
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #17 - 07/25/21 at 15:32:53
Post Tools
Pawnpusher wrote on 07/25/21 at 10:42:45:
I think that CB was absolutely wrong but Bragesjo is on point that Stockfish 14 does use the FF2 ideas of larger net and LcO based data to create that net. Irony at the least.

Are this really ideas? Using a larger net is the normal development in computing. Taking LcO based data isn't a new idea either.

But maybe I'm wrong. I'm no computer expert. This is about automated decision making aka artificial intelligence. Someone working in this field should be able to give a more qualified statement.
  

Medical textbooks say I should be dead since April 2002.
Dum spiro spero. Smiley
Narcissm is the humans primary disease.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pawnpusher
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 273
Joined: 01/04/18
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #16 - 07/25/21 at 10:42:45
Post Tools
I think that CB was absolutely wrong but Bragesjo is on point that Stockfish 14 does use the FF2 ideas of larger net and LcO based data to create that net. Irony at the least.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1819
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #15 - 07/25/21 at 10:33:40
Post Tools
I am no legal expert. We will have to see what happends. I did not read the Houdini part before.

About the quote Chessbase modifikation of Stockfish was basicly a twice as large neural network and use of Lc0 generated data. And Stockfish 14 major improvments over Stockfish 13 are basicly the same thing but better done. I predict that Stockfish 15 will have even larger network.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
IsaVulpes
Senior Member
****
Offline


No.

Posts: 345
Joined: 12/09/07
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #14 - 07/23/21 at 19:20:59
Post Tools
https://www.chess.com/news/view/stockfish-developers-sue-chessbase-claiming-copy... Peter Doggers put up a text with the odd Chessbase quote

"One can righteously criticize the articles about Fat Fritz on Chessbase.com which constituted an unacceptable belittlement of Stockfish. The reverse belittlement of Albert's innovations by SF does not balance this, even if they now seem to follow his path with SF 14."

Ha-ha-ha.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pawnpusher
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 273
Joined: 01/04/18
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #13 - 07/23/21 at 10:49:13
Post Tools
We need input from someone who has actually practiced copyright law in the EU.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
an ordinary chessplayer
God Member
*****
Offline


I used to be not bad.

Posts: 1637
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)
Joined: 01/02/15
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #12 - 07/22/21 at 18:51:36
Post Tools
nocteus wrote on 07/22/21 at 17:17:15:
how you could violate a copyright on an open source material

The first thing to realize is that publishing something (open source or closed source or other methods) does not negate your copyright. In fact copyright only applies to published works, it's the whole point of copyright to encourage publication by allowing the author to retain the rights. The second thing to realize is that you as copyright holder have the right to charge for use, and can waive that charge ("free" as in beer) under certain conditions. That's where it gets complicated, because everybody understands and agrees with the free part, but they don't understand and agree with the conditions part. So in effect by not complying with the conditions, the user is violating not the copyright itself but the license which governs the free part.

Not giving any details because, first, the GPL is controversial, and second, I am not a lawyer. In particular the GNU General Public License (GPL) places conditions on the use of the software, and thereby on the user of the software, which the average person is going to find strange. As TonyRo points out, people frequently ignore the conditions, but they do NOT have the right to ignore those conditions. It is your right as copyright holder to enforce those conditions.

It wouldn't surprise me if the Stockfish devs have some backing from free-software lawyers with an interest in the case, pour encourager les autres. There is also the interesting point that by waiting to file, they have allowed ChessBase to ring up more sales, which may mean greater damages to collect. One thing is clear. If they did not sue, history shows ChessBase was just going to do the same thing again in the future.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nocteus
Full Member
***
Offline


'Help your pieces, they
will help you.' Morphy

Posts: 138
Joined: 04/29/11
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #11 - 07/22/21 at 17:17:15
Post Tools
IsaVulpes wrote on 07/22/21 at 09:45:34:
bragesjo wrote on 07/22/21 at 07:46:39:
Extremly unetical yes but illegal no. I would be surprised if they win.

ChessBase is clearly and openly violating the GPL license, so I would be surprised if Team Stockfish DIDN'T win.


I confess, I would like some explanations on how you could violate a copyright on an open source material. I am not well-informed on the matter at all.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
brabo
God Member
*****
Offline


Welcome chessfriend

Posts: 1064
Joined: 02/02/07
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #10 - 07/22/21 at 13:38:16
Post Tools
Bibs wrote on 07/22/21 at 11:48:35:
What is FRC?

Worth noting that not all here are necessarily massively knowledgeable about computer chess.

Federal Republic of Chelsea? I’ve no idea.


Fischer Random Chess so nothing to do with computer chess. I guess it is still not well known as FRC is despite of being around for decades not popular at all.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
TonyRo
God Member
*****
Offline


I'm gonna crack your skull!

Posts: 1826
Location: Cleveland, OH
Joined: 11/26/07
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #9 - 07/22/21 at 13:17:18
Post Tools
I have been a light staff member of lichess for quite a while now, and two things continually amaze me:

1. How few people actually understand the GNU General Public License.
2. How many people that actually do/should understand the GPL choose to ignore it for their own gains.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bibs
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2337
Joined: 10/24/06
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #8 - 07/22/21 at 11:48:35
Post Tools
What is FRC?

Worth noting that not all here are necessarily massively knowledgeable about computer chess.

Federal Republic of Chelsea? I’ve no idea.

Well, bragesjo - illegal or unethical. That’s what the lawsuit is about, ultimately isn’t it? Simply dirty and unethical, or illegal? I’m not sure it’s you who’s deciding. I’d take a punt on ‘illegal’, but dunno if one can bet on lawsuits.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
brabo
God Member
*****
Offline


Welcome chessfriend

Posts: 1064
Joined: 02/02/07
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #7 - 07/22/21 at 11:29:41
Post Tools
bragesjo wrote on 07/22/21 at 09:10:27:
A funny thing was that Fat Fritz 2 was 2 elo better than Stockfish 13 in blitz but not in rapid and new Stockfish 14 is signifikanly better than Fat Fritz 2 in  both blitz and rapid.

I have another interpretation of significantly if I look at https://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/404/
11 points difference on the astronomical 3724 is peanuts.
In fact I tested Stockfish 14 already and it barely improved compared to Stockfish 13. The real difference is FRC but who cares about FRC. Anybody playing FRC is exactly to avoid engines.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
IsaVulpes
Senior Member
****
Offline


No.

Posts: 345
Joined: 12/09/07
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #6 - 07/22/21 at 09:45:34
Post Tools
bragesjo wrote on 07/22/21 at 07:46:39:
Extremly unetical yes but illegal no. I would be surprised if they win.

ChessBase is clearly and openly violating the GPL license, so I would be surprised if Team Stockfish DIDN'T win.

The main "issue" I think is whether there is actually a way to sue for damages, or the result will just be a "Now you REALLY gotta stop distributing it" coming in, with CB getting to pocket everything they've scammed so far

Perhaps the main damage caused to CB after this will/should be a number of people having fewer moral quandaries about acquiring their products via dodgy russian sites, rather than Amazon..
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1819
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #5 - 07/22/21 at 09:10:27
Post Tools
A funny thing was that Fat Fritz 2 was 2 elo better than Stockfish 13 in blitz but not in rapid and new Stockfish 14 is signifikanly better than Fat Fritz 2 in  both blitz and rapid.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1819
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #4 - 07/22/21 at 08:19:50
Post Tools
If one does not have a Fritz interface program one buys it else no point.

Or else if one does not know how to install engines. I had to help a friend to install Stockfish in hes Fritz program
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jonathan Tait
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 614
Location: Nottingham
Joined: 07/11/06
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #3 - 07/22/21 at 08:17:41
Post Tools
Why would anybody buy their engines, whether ripped off or not, when you can download Stockfish and Leela for nothing?
  

blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1819
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #2 - 07/22/21 at 07:46:39
Post Tools
Extremly unetical yes but illegal no. I would be surprised if they win.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bibs
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2337
Joined: 10/24/06
Re: Stockfish suing ChessBase
Reply #1 - 07/21/21 at 23:04:07
Post Tools
Good. Hope ChesBase get really burned on this.

I bought Fat Fritz 2. I didn’t know all this stuff at the time, sadly. If I had known I would not have purchased. When I found out, I felt like a mug - that hurt. Deep diving the details afterwards, it was illuminating and disturbing to read that Chessbase has repeatedly done this.

Agree with OP - hope ChessBase get their comeuppance here, finally. That the antics of Silver and co are found to be not just highly unethical but plain illegal.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IsaVulpes
Senior Member
****
Offline


No.

Posts: 345
Joined: 12/09/07
Stockfish suing ChessBase
07/20/21 at 21:24:38
Post Tools
CB is finally getting its comeuppance for selling an SF derivate and pretending it's their own work  Smiley

https://stockfishchess.org/blog/2021/our-lawsuit-against-chessbase/
( Original statement, in case you missed/forgot the happenings:
- https://stockfishchess.org/blog/2021/statement-on-fat-fritz-2/
- https://lichess.org/blog/YCvy7xMAACIA8007/fat-fritz-2-is-a-rip-off )

Albert Silver, the """developer""" who first copied Leela, then followed up by copying SF12, and proceeded to sell both of those at a ludicrous pricepoint, without anything close to proper credit being given, might finally learn that there is more to being an engine author than thievery and scamming people.

Amusing also, that they were even still selling Houdini 6 (yet another Stockfish reskin) in their shop, again at full price of course..  Roll Eyes

The license breaches were obvious, and their unabashed greed left more than just a sour taste in the mouth of the entire open source chess community. I shall hope they bleed  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo