Yet an other game same line. See a pattern?

https://www.iccf.com/game?id=1408256

I will soon make a post I hinted on after I completed some more ongong games. I can only add that I met Cheparinovs very so called improvment in a Correspondence Chess game where I played a slight improvement and sacrificed a pawn to activate rock and after rock exchange I sacrificed one more pawn to get a fortress where win is impossible due to opposete color Bishops thus we took a draw.

EDIT
This is not critic vs Cheparinov. His Kings Indian base for black was very good including in Correspondence Chess but some lines like this anti Dragon line and some lines in his Ruy Lopez base for white do not work in Correspondence Chess. I am probeby not the target group.

Hi.

As white you might get a lot of 2...Nc6 Symmetrical English positions e.g.
1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.0-0
They are quite flexible for black. I'd recommend switching with 3.d4 sometimes as well.

Have a nice day.

Bragesjo seems to get positions he wants on the board according to his post 

Like Bragesjo said, I think the main issue is not with the objective evaluation of the Dragon - Black is going to equalize somewhere, it's just that you don't really get what you want out of it anymore. The Dragon lines everyone is super excited to play as Black are not the ones that equalize, and the lines that White players are trying now are tremendously unpalatable. 

Regarding the point of this overall system, I don't get it. Sure, you put your bishop on g2/g7 in all the lines and push your c-pawn, but the similarities end there. Besides possibly reaching a Benoni or Dragon Reversed in roughly 1% of your games, it's just not gonna matter. Chess is not a one-sided game - where your opponent placed their pieces matters.

Where you from Benford?

The English-Dragon-Benoni universal system consists in playing c4, g3, Bg2, Nf3, O-O, d3, in some order, with both colors, against absolutely everything, regardless of what the opponent does.

As White: English Fianchetto variation
As Black against 1.e4: Sicilian Dragon or Accelerated Dragon or Hyper-Accelerated Dragon
As Black against 1.d4: Modern Benoni
As Black against 1.c4 and 1.Nf3: Symmetrical English

What do you think about this universal system?

Would it be a good idea to adopt this universal system?

The Sicilian Dragon and the Modern Benoni are playable, but they are objectively not very good for Black. Among super-GMs (2700+):
- the Dragon is played 20 times less commonly than the Najdorf
- in the Sicilian, the move 2...g6 (Hyper-Accelerated Dragon) is played 60 times less commonly than 2...d6
- after 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4, the move 2...c5 (Modern Benoni, Czech Benoni, Benko Gambit) is played 20 times less commonly than 2...g6 (KID, Grunfeld) and 50 times less commonly than 2...e6

Are there any ways for my opponent to prevent me from playing the universal system or to cause me serious problems?

Should I play the Dragon or the Accelerated Dragon or the Hyper-Accelerated Dragon? Which of the three Dragons fits best with the rest of the universal system? Or perhaps even the Pterodactyl?