FreeRepublic wrote on 05/23/24 at 12:19:47:
What is the point of the Two Knights variation?
It's hard to tell if that was Cheparinov's quiestion or yours. But I assume Cheparinov, since that's the kind of question a GM would ask. As the GM should well know, there are as many reasons to prefer 3...Nf6 as there are reasons to prefer 3...Bc5, and not all of them will apply to every player, or indeed to every game.
I see 3...Nf6 as a more fighting move. After 3...Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 white has a variety of Dangerous Drawing Weapons (TM) to choose from. I well remember in a round-robin tournament my opponent blitzing out the first 20 moves in this rinky-dink line (see Vykouk - Percivaldi), leaving me to regret not having played a different opening entirely. Don't get me wrong, I play rinky-dink openings myself, just not in pursuit of an opposite-colored bishops =+ endgame. Probably for a GM 1...e5 is already an implicit draw offer, but here in the trenches we're just playing chess. There are "even more drawn" variations than this one after 5.d4, and I have my crafty ways to keep the game alive, but the danger is real that my opponent can dig up another one I haven't seen before. Thus 3...Nf6. Sometimes.
[Event "EU-ch U18 26th"]
[Site "Prague"]
[Date "2016.08.27"]
[Round "9"]
[White "Vykouk, Jan"]
[Black "Percivaldi, Martin"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[WhiteElo "2434"]
[BlackElo "2361"]
[ECO "C56"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.O-O Nxe4 7.cxd4 d5 8.dxc5
dxc4 9.Qe2 Qd3 10.Re1 f5 11.Nc3 O-O 12.Nxe4 fxe4 13.Qxe4 Bf5 14.Qh4 Rae8
15.Bf4 Qd5 16.Bxc7 Qxc5 17.Qg3 Qd5 18.h4 Qd7 19.Bd6 Rxe1+ 20.Rxe1 Re8 21.
Rxe8+ Qxe8 22.Bc5 Be4 23.Nd4 a6 24.Qg4 h5 25.Qe2 Nxd4 26.Bxd4 Qg6 27.f3
Bd3 28.Qe5 b5 29.a3 Kh7 30.Bc3 Bf5 1/2-1/2