kylemeister wrote on 06/26/24 at 11:50:17:
Pcal wrote on 06/26/24 at 03:50:00:
Maybe something like the Reverse Zvjaginsev;
But it seems Pcal was referring to 9. e4. As to 10...h6, I still recall the late Jeremy Silman writing about 34 years ago that he considered it a complete answer to the Colle. (That was in notes to a game of his 1990 match against Colle specialist IM Doug Root.)
I'll take anything over the Koltanowski Phoenix Attack... lol
From here on out I'm just calling it The Koltamoski 9.b4 Var,
So far Rudel's analysis is very solid.. going over the lines with SF 16.1.. not seeing anything bogus. (about halfway through)
Yes Sir, the Nc6 mainline. Silman's 10...h4 in the old main line of 9.e4 I'm not going to say it refutes 9.e4 but is sure comes close. Black equalizes but .... in a position with serious tension on both sides. 11. b4 yields nothing for White if Black is up on his Nc6 theory. 11.Bc2 IMO ...things get tricky, White is able to get some play in the position by knowing his/her way around 12.h3 or 12 Kh1 (emphasis on "some") Black's Bishop sitting at c5 with the threat of his/her knight at f6 going to g4 attacking f2 or (attacking by way of h5 then to g3 ) disrupts White position really bad IMHO
& I still can't see a way thorough 10...Bb6 where Black ignores white's threats on h7 altogether (due to Black's set up , the Greek gift is not really being a threat with correct play)
I'm finding with the 9.b4 var, none of the above happens. White either pushes the queen side pawns down the board disrupting Black's set up, or opens diagonals for the bishops e.g. a1-h8, a2-g8 & a3-f8 disrupts Black center with attacks like playing his knight to g5... (attacking f7) attacks Black center from the flank by way of the queenside sometimes both, sometimes all three... Black just never gets the dynamic play seen when White plays 9.e4.
So far... so good.
Yet, It's too soon for me to be committal...
9...Bb6 could be an issue Not a lot of master games out there even after 10yrs ...
What led me off on this Chess journey was the game Wei Yi vs Vidit Santosh Gujrathi
Tata Steel Masters (2024), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 13.
Both super GMs tied ... winner shares 1 place (hence the purse) loser.. get's chump change and 2nd place.
Gujrathi as Black didn't play the Nc6 main line and choose the Nd7 line
Why?
Was it 9.b4? IDK...
If 9.b4 is solid, it puts the Colle Koltanowski back in my repertoire.