Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Lemberger counter-gambit (Read 26074 times)
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #30 - 07/19/04 at 08:08:14
Post Tools
15...Rfd8 and not Rfc8, Teyko, read me better, where, in the same spirit of your last post, "Black is completely winning, a solid pawn up"  Smiley

I am not at home these days and I cannot use my ADSL connection neither am I in the mood of analysing the BDG. Smiley
We shall resume this interesting discussion in september.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sevenviolets
Guest


4.Nge2! Nc6
Reply #29 - 07/19/04 at 01:55:32
Post Tools
Dear Eric,
     I miss your reply to Nc6 line analysis. Do you consider it viable? Or is there some hole in it? Thanks for answer.

Patrik
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #28 - 06/22/04 at 01:13:37
Post Tools
This is the moves in 9. Be3

GM Prie,Tommy - -1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 e5 4.Qh5 Nc6 5.dxe5 Bb4 6.Bd2 g6 7.Qe2 Nd4 8.Qd1 Bf5 9.Be3 9...Nc6 10.Bb5 Nge7 11.Nge2 0–0 12.a3 Bxc3+ 13.Nxc3 Nxe5 14.Bh6 14...Qxd1+ 15.Rxd1 Rfc8 16.Bf4 

The Blackmar Diemar lives in light of the Lemberger Countergambit. Now if I can only solve the Hubsch.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #27 - 06/22/04 at 01:10:23
Post Tools
J.,Tommy - GM Prie RC1 line [D00]
1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 e5 4.Qh5 Nc6 5.dxe5 Bb4 6.Bd2 g6 7.Qe2 Nd4 8.Qd1 Bf5 9.Rc1 Qd7 10.Nge2 0–0–0 11.Bg5 f6 12.exf6 Bxc3+ 13.bxc3 Ne6 14.Qxd7+ Rxd7 15.h4 

Did you miss me? This is my move in the 9.Rc1 line.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Patrik Schoupal
Guest


Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #26 - 06/03/04 at 12:34:58
Post Tools
Dear BDG-ers, dear Eric,
    sorry for delay in our discussion, analysis take some time to be correct and sound. Finally, have a look on this lines, which seems o.k. White has an advantage here. 

(1) BDG - Lemberger with 4..Nc6 [B01]
home, 09.09.2003
[Analysis by Rajmund Emanuel ]

/ B01 or D00 1.d4 d5 2.e4 / - 1.e4 d5 2.d4! dxe4 3.Nc3 e5 4.Nge2! Nc6 It has been mentioned almost like the refutation of BDG on the www.chesspublishing.com web site... 5.d5 Nce7 6.Ng3 Nf6 7.Bc4 c6 8.Bg5! Nfxd5 as recommended by GM Eric Prie 9.Ngxe4 [9.Qh5!? is an interesting try, but black has strong continuation with Qb6! 10.Ngxe4 Be6! 11.Nd6+ Kd7 12.Nde4 and now, he/she is able to hold the position by Rd8, Kc8 manouvre and the position remains rougly equal then.] 

9...f5 

A) 9...Bf5 10.Qf3 f6 
(10...Nxc3 11.Nxc3 Qd4 (11...f6 12.Be3 Bxc2?! as far as I remember this move has never been good for black in BDG (12...Qc8 13.0–0 with more than good compensation) 13.Qe2 Bg6 14.0–0 (or even 14.Rd1!? Qa5 15.h4! Nf5 16.h5 Nxe3 17.fxe3 Bf5 18.0–0 e4 following two spectacular moves by ChessTiger2.0 19.Nb5!! Bc8 20.b4! Qb6 21.h6 g6 22.Rxf6+-) 14...Qa5 15.Rfd1 Nf5 16.Qg4 Bb4 17.Nd5! Kf8 18.Nxb4 Nxe3 19.fxe3 Qxb4 20.Rd7 Re8 21.Rc7±) 12.Be2!? f6 13.Be3 Qd6 14.0–0 with initiative) 
11.0–0–0 Bxe4 (11...fxg5 12.Nxd5! cxd5 13.Rxd5 Nxd5 14.Qxf5 Qe7 15.Rd1!+-) 12.Nxe4 fxg5 13.Nxg5 Qa5 14.Qf7+ Kd7 15.Bb3 Kc7 16.Ne6+ Kb6 17.c4 Nb4 18.c5+ Ka6 19.a3 (19.Rd7 Rc8 20.Kb1±) 19...Nbd5 20.Bc4+ b5 21.Bxd5+-; 

B) 9...f6?! 10.Qh5+! (spectacular, but not the best  is 10.Bxf6?! gxf6 11.Nxf6+ Nxf6! now, white is winning queen with a well-known motif, but the position remains very unclear to me (but certainly not 11...Kf7? 12.Qf3‚ which gives white strong attack) 12.Bf7+ Kxf7 13.Qxd8 Rg8 unclear) 10...Ng6 11.0–0–0‚ with strong attack e.g. 11...Be6 (11...fxg5 12.Nxd5 cxd5 13.Rxd5 Qc7 14.Bb5+ Kf7 15.Nxg5++-) 12.Bxf6 gxf6 13.Bxd5 cxd5 14.Nxd5 Bxd5 15.Rxd5 Qe7 16.Rhd1±] 

10.Ng3 Qa5 [10...Nxc3?? 11.Bf7+! Kxf7 12.Qxd8+-; 10...f4?! 11.Nge4 Bf5 12.0–0± black is tied up]

11.0–0 Nxc3 12.bxc3 Nd5 [12...Qxc3 13.Bb3 (13.Qh5+?! g6 14.Qh4 h6! 15.Bf6 Rh7 16.Rfe1 Qd4 17.Qxd4 exd4 18.Bxd4=) 13...Qd4 14.Qe2!‚ with attack e.g. 14...Qg4? 15.Qxe5!! spectacular move, bishop is forbidden 15...Qxg5 16.Ne4!+-] 13.Re1 Bd6 14.Bb3±


However, I´ve found one line where there is only = for white. It is on move 10, though black has to make two strong moves in a row to hold position and even after them the position is o.k. for practical game purposes, from the theoretical point of view, it is not enough. For those who want to win even in correspondence play, enjoy improvement over the line at:

http://www.mujweb.cz/www/rajmunde/horizon.htm

For great Bogoljubow analysis click here:

http://www.mujweb.cz/www/rajmunde/ec_ena_bo.htm

Enjoy it and have a good time.
And Eric, I´m looking forward to your answer and I hope you have a good time at Mitropa Cup.

Patrik
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #25 - 05/26/04 at 05:41:08
Post Tools
"11. Bg5 f6! 12. exf6!?"

12...Fxc3+ 13.bxc3 (13.Nxc3 ? Qe6!-+) Ne6 14.Qxd7+ Rxd7.

Well, Teyko, I leave on friday for the Mitropa-Cup in Slovakia (captain of the french team) so this is enough for a while. 
Anyway, I studied another line of the Sneiders (4...Nf6), in White's favour, as THE BDG game  Wink in the forthcoming update...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #24 - 05/25/04 at 14:10:00
Post Tools
Quote:
9. Be3 Nc6 10 Bb5 Ne7 11. Nge2 0-0 12. a3 Bxc3 13.Nxc3 Nxe5.

9. Rc1 Qd7 10. Nge2 0-0-0 11. Bg5 f6! 
 





As you know, GM Prie I am having trouble making the 9. Rc1 line work, but I believe I have found a tenable continuation for white. 

11. Bg5 f6! 12. exf6!?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #23 - 05/23/04 at 12:21:56
Post Tools
"In the 9.Be3 line I play 14. Bh6"
and I reply with the forced 14...Qxd1 15.Rxd1 Rfd8.

"In the 9. Rc1 line I play 12. Qxd4"

So you take back your taken back move ? Smiley
As you suggested 12...Qxd4 13.Nxd4 fxg5.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #22 - 05/22/04 at 21:19:55
Post Tools
Quote:
9. Be3 Nc6 10 Bb5 Ne7 11. Nge2 0-0 12. a3 Bxc3 13.Nxc3 Nxe5.

9. Rc1 Qd7 10. Nge2 0-0-0 11. Bg5 f6! 
 




In the 9.Be3 line I play 14. Bh6

In the 9. Rc1 line I play 12. Qxd4
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #21 - 05/20/04 at 15:07:03
Post Tools
I did mean the "6.Ng3 Nf6!? 7.Bc4 c6 8.Bg5 Nfxd5" line.
And I am very curious !
Anyway, as you suggested 7...a6 (7...Nf5? 8.Bb5+!) 8.0-0 Nf5 (preferably to 8...Ng6) 9.Ngxe4 Nxe4 10.Nxe4 Nd6, in the spirit of my published analysis, seems OK for Black.

And for Teyko, 9. Rc1 Qd7 10. Nge2 0-0-0 11. Be3 Nc6 looks like an inferior version, for White, of the other branch of the analysis.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Patrik Schoupal
Guest


Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #20 - 05/20/04 at 04:30:48
Post Tools

Bonjour Eric!

    in my game you suggest after 4.Nge2 Nc6 5.d5 Nce7 6.Ng3 f5 7.Bc4 c6 (instead of a6) and after 8.Bg5 Nfxd5, but in this position, there is no knight on f6 yet. Do you mean 6.Ng3 Nf6!? 7.Bc4 c6 8.Bg5 Nfxd5 line or 6.Ng3 f5 7.Bc4 Nf6 line? We can choose line and then I can share my analysis with you, it looks white has an upper hand in these positions.

Sincerely yours

7 violets

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #19 - 05/19/04 at 04:57:59
Post Tools
OKAY! I NEED A TAKE BACK. I thought that I could be equal in the Bg5 lines because f6 13. Qxd4 Qxd4 14. Nxd4 fxg5...but I don't have anything in that position...If I am missing something please share it with me. But after closer evaluation I can play 11. Be3 with a hope of sucess. I don't think Nf3+ is as bad as I thought.

so 9. Rc1 Qd7 
10. Nge2 0-0-0
11. Be3
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
alumbrado
God Member
*****
Offline


Esse quam videri bonus
malebo

Posts: 1418
Location: London
Joined: 02/17/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #18 - 05/19/04 at 03:43:39
Post Tools
Hmm ... This one move at a time drip-feed is getting a bit wearing ... any chance you guys can string more than a couple of moves of this together?!  Cheesy
  

If sometimes we fly too close to the sun, at least this shows we are spreading our wings.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #17 - 05/19/04 at 03:23:46
Post Tools
9. Be3 Nc6 10 Bb5 Ne7 11. Nge2 0-0 12. a3 Bxc3 13.Nxc3 Nxe5.

9. Rc1 Qd7 10. Nge2 0-0-0 11. Bg5 f6! 
 



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
Re: Lemberger counter-gambit
Reply #16 - 05/18/04 at 14:36:44
Post Tools
I had the wrong position set up on the board. it should be 11. Bg5 in the 9. Rc1 line. I don't want to get into Nf3+.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo