Quote:


  Dear Inn 2. I´m playing BDG against 3 strong opponents, yet I´m not going to lose any single game. Maybe one or two draws, one (two?) wins. Results speak more than words. You told us "draws conceded in this game will embolden BDG trolls".. 
  Let´s see it from different perspective. In "normal" openings, do white have any substantial plus after opening? I don´t think so. See database statistics, in many lines it is something like 40-40-30 (win-draw-lost) or 50-40-10 etc. Is there any difference to have a draw after 45 moves Sicilian defense or to have the same result after BDG is played? Draw is simply a draw. According to the Rajmund Emanuel´s ED hypothesis it is not a success. According to normal chess perception, it is quite normal result showing that black has defended well and was somehow able to equalise. It is the same in other openings, the main ones included. Most of the ECO lines end with +/=, but this is an advantage not enough to win a game. Some mistake or more than two dubious moves have to come, of course, when position is +/= there is higher probability that the mistake will come from the other player. After my recent experience I consider BDG to be playable in high-level correspondence chess. Overall results for BDG on this level are though disasterous, the same with Morra gambit. But I think it is simply because white players are playing it weak. I know about some 10 or more Morra gambit games played by Rajmund Emanuel against strong opponents on ICCF and CFC and guess what is the result... it is something like 9 1/2 : 1/2 !! And the only reason for this is that Morra is sound gambit but it is extremely challenging and demanding, from analytical point of view. I think it is the same with BDG. It is very difficult to play. Many people don´t realize this. It is easy to beat your opponent in line you know in 5min blitz, but to play the same line of BDG in normal time control, it is different story, esp. when your opponent is above 2200 - such players simply can defend. 
  I don´t like rubbish chess myself. Moves like 1.h4? etc. which give me an advantage or at least equality immediatelly 1..e5! I don´t see any point in playing 1.d4 c5 2.b4 etc. But on the other hand I like to experiment and to play interesting chess, therefore in rapid time control I sometimes met 1.Nf3 by g5!? recently scoring 1 win and a draw against about 2200 players. We were all out of book from move 2. But positions which arise were very interesting and difficult.

I think Black could have played a little more ambitiously than 14...e5!?.  For instance, I agree with Bonsai that Black is okay is after 14...Ne6.  There is a little more risk associated with the move, but think it may offer better winning chances.  However, I have to congratulate Bonsai on finding such a clear solution to Black's problems.  This decision is very understandable, especially when the opponent claims +/- in all lines.

So at this point it seems clear that Black has equalised after 18.O-O; however, I think Black has an endgame edge and that he can play for more with 18...Bxc5 19.dxc5 O-O-O.  At first sight, this may look like a certain draw, but I think White has a difficult defense ahead.  I think Black's more active king and better pawns weigh in his favor, though it may not be enough for a win with accurate defense from White.  Anyway, I would be happy to have a position like this for Black, and I would certainly play on from here if it were an OTB game under normal cirmcumstances.  Also, I think it is an interesting rook ending that should be analyzed.

This kind of reminds me of inequality proof in mathematics.  I think Bonsai has found a short, elegant proof that Black >= White.  All that is left is to prove strict inequality!

I'll have to have another look at the position after
1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5 6.Ne5 c6 7.g4 Be6 8.g5 Nd5 9.Ne4 Nd7 10.Nxd7 Qxd7 11.Nc5 Qd6 12.Bg2 Nf4 13.Be4 Bd5 14.Qf3 e5 15.Bxf4 exf4

16.Bxd5 (with 16...Qxd5 17.Qxd5 cxd5 18.0-0 with a draw offer suggested by Patrick), maybe I'll find a way of meaningfully playing on (or maybe not - I'll have to check).

A draw would of course not be fully satisfying against such a poor opening, but at least it might prove one thing (to quote Patrick himself...)
Quote:


The easy equality bit is solved, but maybe one of the other games will be a win for black? Or maybe if I agree to a draw, Patrick will have the time to play Markovich in the 5...Bf5  6. Ne5 e6 line? (one of the various points at which black could have played differently, maybe even the most principled continuation at that point)

Quote:

What does that refer to, by the way? If you talk about my previous 13...0-0-0 14.c3 Nh3, then I don't actually see why 14.Qf3 would be particularly good - as far as I can see black could just go on developing with 14...g6.

Out of curiosity, I analyzed this match a bit myself. With best play, the outcome should be a draw.

Yes, you have choosen the only line I have been aware of which gives an equality to black. Bd5! followed by e5! I hope I still manage to find something but for the time being my analysis ended with = endgame. In my opinion till now, my opponent played the best black´s moves.

1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5 6.Ne5 c6 7.g4 Be6 8.g5 Nd5 9.Ne4 Nd7 10.Nxd7 Qxd7 11.Nc5 Qd6 12.Bg2 Nf4 13.Be4 Bd5 14.Qf3

1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5 6.Ne5 c6 7.g4 Be6 8.g5 Nd5 9.Ne4 Nd7 10.Nxd7 Qxd7 11.Nc5 Qd6 12.Bg2 Nf4 13.Be4

Yes, indeed, 12..Nf4(!) has been the best move according to my analysis.