Okay... I had wanted to post some games later rather than sooner, wanting to organize everything nicely.
However, the asininely stupid analyses that I read here against my gambit forces my hand.  I am posting right now. Before I do so, let me point out several key points:

1. My last name is ZILBERMINTS, not Silberstein.  We are from Poland originally, going all the way back to 1751 (and maybe into the 1520s).

2. I published LOTS OF ANALYSES in BDG #69 and #70.  If you are not too lazy, I suggest you locate these two magazines by using the Internet.

3.  Playing 5-minute games  is good to develop theory.
Since I play on Internet Chess Club, this is where I develop my gambit. Why? The reason is that practically no one plays 7...Nc6 in the Euwe Defense in regular tournaments.

4. Peter Leisebein plays CORRESPONDENCE CHESS. There you get DAYS to analyze your next move. However, in regular over-the-board play, that is not the case. No computers, no crap, no books... Nothing. Just your memory, skill  and brain against your opponent's.

5.  The analyses I saw posted here, with 9...c6 and 9...h6, is superficial, to say the least. Superficial analysis is the main sin of those who claim so-called refutations.

So. Let me see one of you come down all the way to New Jersey (or the Marshall Chess Club in New York City) with a chessboard, pieces, and clock.  Then that person and will play some games. Let us see who will win in a Game/ 30 minutes or G/60 minutes match.

  That all being said, it is time to kick these so called refutations's ass!!

  The games are in the next posting.

Well, I had a short look at Zilbermint Gambit last night finding two "refutations":

1.e4 d5 2.d4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 e6 6.Bg5 Be7 7.Bd3 Nc6 8.0–0 Nxd4 9.Kh1

Refutation A) 9..c6! 10.Ne4 Nxe4 11.Bxe7 Qxe7 12.Bxe4 Nxf3 13.Qxf3 0–0 -/+
 
Refutation B) 9...h6! 10.Bh4 c5 11.Nxd4 cxd4 12.Nb5 e5 -/+ 

I will be quite surprised if someone can prove me wrong. Of course, black has to be super cautious to handle both positions, but there is no "completely safe" way for him available so he must undertake some risk, for two pawns, I will do so Again and again:)

And this is written by someone called anonymous coward? Hmpf.
That having said, I have also two remarks:

1. Two times before I have requested example games of Zilbermints original idea by its inventor;

2. Schiller provides a lot of analysis on his website (unorthodox openings) and still claims -+.

Here's my contribution.

1.  WRITING IN CAPS = SHOUTING.