(UTC)
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing General › ChessPub.com Forum › A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
(Moderators: GMTonyKosten, Smyslov_Fan)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) A challenge to all at ChessPublishing (Read 17902 times)
HgMan
God Member
*****
Offline


Demand me nothing: What
you know, you know

Posts: 2330
Location: Up on Cripple Creek
Joined: 11/09/04
Gender: Male
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #19 - 09/04/05 at 11:28:46
Post Tools
Quote:
sorry for being a silly american:

"Official USCF Correspondence Chess Rules" (http://www.uschess.org/cc/ccrules.php)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your Responsibilities as a Player
3. You may consult chess books and periodicals but not other players. You cannot use a computer or computer program to evaluate a game but you may use computers for record keeping.


USCF and APCT are among the few that continue to push this line.  I recently read an article saying that the Canadian Correspondence Chess Association had followed the ICCF line.  Considerable debate ensued, but, alas, MNb is right: this is impossible to enforce and even difficult to check up on.  ICCF is, as MNb suggests, the standard and they have conceded on this point.  I'm not sure it changes much--uncritical acceptance of Fritz moves can lead to disaster...
  
"Luck favours the prepared mind."  --Louis Pasteur
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #18 - 09/04/05 at 00:09:43
Post Tools
Ian, 

Perhaps it would assuage MNb a bit if we could see some of your previous correspondence games.  That way he can check to see how "Fritzy" the games look.  Is that all right with you?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
hrmm
Guest


Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #17 - 09/04/05 at 00:08:48
Post Tools
sorry for being a silly american:

"Official USCF Correspondence Chess Rules" (http://www.uschess.org/cc/ccrules.php)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your Responsibilities as a Player
3. You may consult chess books and periodicals but not other players. You cannot use a computer or computer program to evaluate a game but you may use computers for record keeping.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #16 - 09/03/05 at 15:25:35
Post Tools
"books and databases allowed"  appears to be the standard for most of the correspondence chess world."
That is not true. ICCF still sets the standard and allows computer analysis.


"it becomes "no computers" by default. "
This means I am not in. It makes no sense to me to set a rule, that is simply asking for fraud.
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ian
Guest


Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #15 - 09/03/05 at 09:19:26
Post Tools
"books and databases allowed"  appears to be the standard for most of the correspondence chess world.  Yes some databases include previously run chess analysis - such as the "chess analysis project" ratings available in CB, etc.  But, we would disallow using a chess engine to 'solve' the particular position from our game.   

So basically once we get out of the opening and are no longer following any historical games... it becomes "no computers" by default.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
castlerock
God Member
*****
Offline


Erro Ergo Sum

Posts: 842
Location: Chennai
Joined: 02/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #14 - 09/03/05 at 00:26:17
Post Tools
Quote:
glad to hear most here would prefer no computers Smiley  that is our standard.


We need to define what is "no computers Smiley"? Does it include database access? As a corollary, does it include books?
  
CastleRock
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ian
Guest


Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #13 - 09/02/05 at 15:53:10
Post Tools
glad to hear most here would prefer no computers Smiley  that is our standard.   

so, how many do you have?  do you have a volunteer to be captain (someone who simply reports the team move every 2-3 days)?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
elspringer
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 170
Location: Gent
Joined: 03/26/04
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #12 - 09/02/05 at 06:26:23
Post Tools
Now, Willempie, thàt would interest me ! Just give the exact move-order, so that I can checj how I can fit it into my repertoire !
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #11 - 09/02/05 at 05:35:59
Post Tools
Well only communicating via PM's seems a tad impractical, so I suggest just opening a thread titled something like the "BDG-Euwe Defense-accelarated Zilbermints-Von Popiel gambit line". That would scare most "spies" off I'd think. Wink

I like the idea, but I wont be able to contribute on a regular basis, so that would mean 5 moves hearing nothing from me and then 5 other moves where you would wish I wasnt there.
  
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
X
God Member
*****
Offline


Education is a system
of imposed ignorance.Chomsky

Posts: 571
Joined: 10/04/03
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #10 - 09/02/05 at 04:24:59
Post Tools
Quote:
there is a private message function here in the forum.  am not particularly interested in fritzy corr. games (always an extremely practical OTB player!), but if the opening interests me... then can always chip in with a suggestion or two Smiley


Ha!  Glad to hear there are others.
  
Power to the People!&&http://www.gravel2008.us/           http://www.nationalinitiative.us/&&Mike Gravel for President 2008
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
woofwoof
God Member
*****
Offline


chess is like life

Posts: 929
Location: Singapore
Joined: 07/04/05
Gender: Male
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #9 - 09/01/05 at 11:30:59
Post Tools
Quote:
there is a private message function here in the forum.  am not particularly interested in fritzy corr. games (always an extremely practical OTB player!), but if the opening interests me... then can always chip in with a suggestion or two Smiley


same here.
  
"I don't make mistakes. I make prophecies which immediately turn out to be wrong." - Murray Walker
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
lnn2
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1504
Location: nc
Joined: 09/22/04
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #8 - 09/01/05 at 10:42:02
Post Tools
there is a private message function here in the forum.  am not particularly interested in fritzy corr. games (always an extremely practical OTB player!), but if the opening interests me... then can always chip in with a suggestion or two Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #7 - 08/31/05 at 16:12:00
Post Tools
I can't speak for others, but I'm pretty sure we can get a group of fairly committed (or at least ones that oughta be Wink ) players together.  This forum does attract correspondence players so they're used to long games.  I do have one question though:

Since this is a public forum, how will we keep you from seeing our moves?  Will we have to give our private e-mails out to our teammates?  (It's not a problem, just a question.)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ian
Guest


Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #6 - 08/31/05 at 12:12:35
Post Tools
that game is basically over.  we are just waiting for him to resign.  we will be looking to start the next game in the next couple weeks (whenever you or another group tells us you are ready).

i presume you guys will need more than just 2 participants Smiley  ideally you would have 10 or more guys to contribute.  we would like to see that there is a serious committment to finishing a game.


thanks
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
castlerock
God Member
*****
Offline


Erro Ergo Sum

Posts: 842
Location: Chennai
Joined: 02/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: A challenge to all at ChessPublishing
Reply #5 - 08/31/05 at 05:14:26
Post Tools
Should we wait for your current game to get over before we start this?
  
CastleRock
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge