MNb wrote on 02/20/08 at 00:05:11:
-
Le Théâtre de l'Absurde ACT 1:
Carl: - I think 4… exf3 5.Nxf3 c6 beats the BDG. 6.Bc4 Bf5 -/+
MNb: -
Carl: - So, what about 6.Ne5!?
MNb: -
Carl: -
MNb: - I have refuted the BDG with 4… c5 5.d5 exf3 6.Nxf3 a6 7.Bg5 e6
Carl: - Hmm… what about 8.Qd2 Be7 9.0-0-0 exd5 10.Bxf6 Bxf6 11.Nxd5 0-0 12.Bd3 Nc6 13.Nxf6 Qxf6 14.Ng5 +/-
MNb: -
Carl: -
MNb: - 4… c6 is the refutation of the BDG, because White has
nothing but 5.Bc4 exf3 6.Nxf3 Bf5
Carl: - Eh… Milner Barry played 5.fxe4. Richter and Veresov would probably go 5.Bg5. Diemer played 5.Nxe4.
MNb: -
David: - 4… exf3 5.Nxf3 c6 looks worrying due to these recent corr games.
Carl: - I trust one of those players, and he picks 6.Bc4 Bf5 7.Bg5. So maybe that’s White’s best try.
MNb: - YOU ARE A TYPICAL BIASED BDG-FANATIC!
Carl: - Que?
MNb: - YOU HAVE NO PROOF! SHOW ME MOVES AND ANALYSIS!
Carl: - Proof of what? I have no thesis to prove
MNb: - YOU ARE A BDG-PSYCHO! YOU LIKE THE BDG, SO YOU ARE A PSYCHO! PURE LOGIC!
Carl: - But, I just said I like
Black after 5… c6 6.Bc4 Bf5
MNb: - YOU ARE ONE OF THOSE! IGNORANT LIKE SAWYER!
Carl: - I don’t like Sawyer either…
MNb: - THAT’S YOUR PROBLEM! I DON’T CARE!
Carl: - Well, you mentioned…
MNb: - TYPICAL BIASED BDG-FANATISM! JUST STOPS ANALYZING! SHOW ME MOVES!
Carl: - Are you serious? You haven’t reacted to a single move or analysis yet, but OK; how is your “refutation” doing then? 4… c5 5.d5 exf3 6.Nxf3 a6 7.Bg5 e6 8.Qd2 Be7 9.0-0-0 exd5 10.Bxf6 Bxf6 11.Nxd5 0-0 12.Bd3 Nc6 13.Nxf6 Qxf6 14.Ng5 +/- where
you kind of “stopped analyzing”
MNb: - YAAAAAWN! YOU ARE BORING. FIND SOMEONE ELSE TO QUARREL.
Carl: - What a waste.
You addressed
me. Your remarks are on
me, not on analysis.
I reply to quarrel.
Rideau.
Are you publishing this play? If so, can you send me a copy?