Uberdecker wrote on 01/22/08 at 16:30:36:
How can one even seriously debate this ? White has blundered a pawn in return for some development and Black sensibly avoids entering early tactical skirmishes. This is not a matter of style, but of common sense. LDZ considers it unsporting for Black not to offer White a glimpse of a counter-chance, but he does not realise that it was up to him to seize that chance himself on his second move.
What? Uberdeker, you are flat out wrong! Blundering a pawn on the second move? Looks like you don't understand that the BDG is 1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 NOT 1 d4 d5 2 e4
Also, does the King's Gambit blunder a pawn? No. Yet both the King's Gambit and the BDG have common themes. Both go for development, a strong attack, and use the open f-file.
Now, I challenge Mr. Uberdeker to a match, G/60, on the Internet Chess Club. Let us see you demonstrate your skill in an over-the-board match against me.
I await your response, sir.
The gauntlet has been thrown. Do you accept?