MNb wrote on 12/23/07 at 03:05:57:
Palkovy's book on this opening takes more than 300 pages and he has not researched all transpositional options! And theory of the Morra Gambit develops quite fast in important lines as well.
The Morra played by anyone above 2000 baffles me. All that theory, and yet Black has several ways to ensure
White is the one fighting for equality! IM Lenderman admitted this in his final ICC Morra lecture, while my personal favorite antidote is Silman's Bd7-system from 'Winning with the Sicilian Defence'. Both Palkövi and Langrock struggle to prove even sufficient compensation against this, and the ideas are easy to understand for Black.
naughtyknight wrote on 12/23/07 at 10:57:57:
Neil McDonald tried to create a simplified set of 'open' Sicilian weapons in Starting out 1.e4 and got some poor reviews because of it. I thought it was a brave attempt, but didn't appear to do the book any favours. The best 'half way house' is Davies Taming the Sicilian.
This reminds me of my experience with the Classical Sicilian. Black is supposed to be most afraid of the Richter-Rauzer and the Sozin, right? I thought so, but against those I win almost every game, while it's the calmer Opens like 6.Be2 6.f3, 6.g3 that really give me problems! If other players feel the same way, then McDonald's and Davies' approaches deserve a lot of attention indeed.
I agree that more amateurs should consider Open Sicilians for White, but at the same time not all the Anti-Sicilians can be considered cop-outs anymore. In particular both the Rossolimo and 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 score at least as well as the open (due of course to the excellent status of the Sveshnikov), and are played at every level as serious winning tries.