Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Why don't we see Tromp more (Read 14828 times)
winawer77
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 249
Location: UK
Joined: 03/31/07
Gender: Male
Re: Why don't we see Tromp more
Reply #2 - 12/24/08 at 10:26:52
Post Tools
I think that it has had its day in the sun. Like the Scandinavian, the novelty factor has worn off and theory has crystallised somewhat, resulting in the best defences available to Black being common knowledge. I'd imagine Eric Prie's excellent analysis has contributed towards this. I guess, ultimately, top GMs don't trust openings like this as much as the main lines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
spam fritter
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 15
Joined: 12/12/08
Re: Why don't we see Tromp more
Reply #1 - 12/23/08 at 20:07:20
Post Tools
Very interesting question - I share your puzzlement as personally it has given me good results too, more so the pseudo-tromp/levitsky than the tromp itself curiously enough.

The retirement of Julian Hodgson is a big reason I suspect, as well as no elite GM advocate (Adams seems to be exclusively 1 e4 these days for example).




  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
saubhikr
Senior Member
****
Offline


Chess is a cruel game
but I still love it

Posts: 332
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Joined: 10/29/06
Gender: Male
Why don't we see Tromp more
12/23/08 at 02:59:12
Post Tools
I am playing Trompowsky over 5 years now with good results (80% score, 2000+ rating performance). Just wander why is it not played that much. White gets dynamic positions and is also of wide different variety (than say Colle).

Any comments ?
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo