trw wrote on 02/23/10 at 04:43:11:
X-Man wrote on 02/22/10 at 20:51:25:
trw wrote on 02/21/10 at 06:24:28:
why is this to be preferred to some the actually wing gambit though? Something like e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e6 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Be7 d4 looks far preferrable to me than anything mentioned on the Portsmouth so far.
I mean honestly I want to have compensation for the pawn not just a bunch of tricks and traps even the most unprepared opponent can easily avoid as long as its not blitz.
The point is that with the black knight on c6 the advance d4-d5 is more powerful. Therefore unlike the original Wing Gambit the Portsmouth Gamibt offers more chances to gain the initiative.
There I completely disagree. e6 can be played to prevent d4-d5 in the portsmouth which is a disgusting pawn advance anyways because of the gaping hole on e5.
In the actual wing gambit I still have my cpawn so I can play c4 forcing d5 late in the game when its useful. Plus I'd rather see black play Nbd7 uncoordinating his pieces, what will he do with the Bc8 bishop now? Lets not forget this line I posted is like an improved Evans gambit cause I already have an active rook on a1! Where in the portsmouth line the rook is useless on a1.
I don't see any compensation in the line you posted and would never play it. While the line I posted.... I play all the time beating many experts with it.
I agree that 4. ... e6 is a serious test to White´s ambitions, but it certain doesn´t refute the Portsmouth Gambit. See:
5.d5 (Worth trying is as well:
a) 5.Bd3!? d5 6.Nbd2 Be7 7.e5 Nh6 8.Nb3 Nf5 9.g4 Nh4 10.Nxh4 Bxh4 11.0-0 f6 12.f4 0-0 13.Be3 += Hansson,D – Niklasson,C, Sweden 1976, 1:0,19.;
b) 5.a3!? Nf6 <d5 6.exd5 exd5 7.Bd3 Nf6 8.0-0 Be7 9.axb4 Nxb4 10.Re1 0-0 11.Ba3 += omacron2 – webcruiser, Gameknot Internet Game 2007; 5. …bxa3 6.c3 Be7 7.Nxa3 Nf6 8.Bd3 0-0 9.h4 d5 10.e5 thunderman – sergeidave, Gameknot Internet 2005; game has actually transformed into a French Wing Gambit with good chances for White> 6.Bd3 <6.axb4 Lxb4+ 7.c3 Le7 8.Bd3 De Jong,P – etna, ICS 1998> Be7 7.0-0 Qb6 8.c3 bxc3 9.NXc3 a6 10.d5 exd5 11.exd5 Nd4 12.Re1 +- Grummich,H – Assmann,H, OIBM Bank Hofmann 1997)
5. … Qf6 (alternatively 5. …exd5 6.exd5 and now:
a) 6. …Qe7+ 7.Be2 Ne5 (Na5 8.0-0 Nf6 9.Re1 Qd6 10.c4 bxc3 11.Ba3 Qc7 12.Bb5+ Kd8 13.Ng5 +- amicus – a_train_5, Gameknot Internet Game2003) 8.Nd4 (8.0-0) d6 9.0-0 Nf6 10.Re1 Kd8 11.f4 +- Kondziela,A – Hennings,D, Dresden 2008
b) 6. … Na5 7.Bb2 Nf6 8.d6 Ne4 9.Qd5 Nf6 10.Qe5+ +- amicus – mercury_whyte, Gameknot Internet Game 2003)
6.c3 and now:
a) 6. …bxc3 7.dxc6 c2 8.Qxc2 Qxa1 9.e5 (9.cxd7+ Bxd710.Qb3 is also interesting, Bolding,K – Lerch,P, Marseille 2001) Ne7! (Bb4+? 10.Kd1 Bc5 11.Bc4 Bd4 12.Nfd2 b5 13.Nb3 bxc4 14.Nxa1 Bxa1 15.Qxc4 Lxe5 16.Qe4 1:0 Ruisinger,W - Bossi, Mendrisio Open 1988) 10.a3 Nxc6 (10. …bxc6? 11.Lb2 Qxb1+ 12Qxb1 +-) 11.Bb2 Nb4 12.Qc1 (12.axb4 Bxb4+ 13.Nfd2 Qa5=) Na2 and drawn because of repetition, Yilmaz,T - Kouatly,B Thessaloniki 1984
b) 6. …Ne5?! 7.Nd4 exd5 8.Nb5 Bc5 9.f4 Kd8 10.Qxd5 d6 11.Nd4 Nd7 12.Nb3 Ne7 13.Qd2 Nc6 14.Bb2 Bb6 15.cxb4 +-Savverymuttu,S - Lees,D, Rhyl 1969