Scott wrote on 03/18/09 at 03:13:00:
I've dabbled with both the Closed and the c3 Sicilian. I think I would much prefer to play one or both of them as White vs. the Sicilian rather than playing the Open Sicilian. So, my questions for those of you with experience with them are: 1) What are the pros/cons of them as compared to each other? 2) What style of play do each of them generally lead to? 3) Should I only concentrate on one or would you recommend a mixture of the two?
I suggest a combination of the Open Sicilian and Alapin Sicilian. If you decide to learn the Alapin, then Sam Collins's book 'Chess Explained: The Alapin Sicilian' is a must read, as is ChessPublishing. Keep in mind that there are also a few shortcuts for White in the Alapin, such as 2.c3 Nf6 3.e5 Nd5 4.Bc4!?, 4.Nf3 or 4.d4 cd4 5.Qd4, all of which are quite tricky for an unprepared opponent to face.
However, at club level and below I would expect 2...d5 to be the move you are most likely to face. Unfortunately I don't know any good shortcuts for White in this line, but the aforementioned sources should be useful in that respect.
There are several possibilities for formulating an Open Sicilian repertoire - for some options I refer you to the relevant threads in the 'Open Sicilian' section of this Forum.
If you are still unsure of what variations you wish to learn, then the following advice by Emms should prove handy:
'If you enjoy tactical positions, and you have got a great memory and lots of time to study opening theory then there's every chance that playing 2.Nf3 and 3.d4, and employing the sharpest lines of the Open Sicilian is the way forward. If you prefer quieter positions with less theory, but ones which are open rather than closed, then the c3-Sicilian(sic) (2.c3) may be the best choice. If you like playing 'systems' and you excel in closed positions, then the Closed Sicilian (2.Nc3 followed by 3.g3) could well be the answer.' (The Survival Guide to Competitive Chess, p.134, Everyman Chess, 2007, John Emms)