belaji wrote on 07/28/09 at 17:02:47:
Do you have any experience with this (which is what I asked)?
Yes, some, mainly in a double "Botvinnik," ie with White playing c4, d3 and e4, knight on e2 and bishop on g2 versus Black playing c5, d6 and e5, bishop on e7 and knight on f6.
From a general positional point of view, it favours White as although the possibilities for pawn breaks are equal on the queenside (b4 for White, ...b5 for Black), White finds it much easier on the kingside to get in f4 compared with Black's abilkity to get in ...f5.
After White plays f4, Black usually plays ...exf to prevent f5. White then has the pleasnat choice of recapturing with the g pawn, the f1 rook, the e2 knighht or the c1 bishop (Kosten in The Dynamic English indicates that the knight recapture is usually best).
True, Black gets the e5 square for his queen's knight, but that often wants to go to d4.
White's g2 bishop and Black's e7 bishop may both look rather restricted but White's is usually better. For instance, after White plays Nd5, Black often feels obliged to capture. White can then recapture with the e pawn, freeing the e4 square for the king's bishop to join in an attack on the kingside.
However, if Black somehow finds time for ...Nf6-d7-e5 and ...Be7-f6, he may well have a good game.
As always the specifics of the position dictate who is better, but I believe the above covers quite a bit of what White at least should be striving for and why the bishop on e7 is less well-placed than it would be on g7.