Yes, I forgot that one. It is in Taimanov already and he concludes += at least.

As far as I can see Tracke is right. Taimanov in his 1985 book on the English (do you know that one, Tracke? A small disadvantage of united Germany is that Sportverlag Berlin does not exist anymore) deals with transpositional issues, without investigating the Acc. Dragon itself.

1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 g6 6.e4 or first 6.Nc2.
1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 g6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Bg7 6.Nc2 (6.e3) d6, Nf6 or even Bxc3+!?
1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 (Nc6) 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 or g6.

White can avoid the Acc. Dragon in two ways:
1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 postponing or not playing d2-d4.
1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 g6 5.g3 Bg7 6.Bg2 Nc6 not playing e2-e4. You should check if Black can force an Acc. Dragon by playing ...Nc6 at an earlier stage.

I suppose the only independent way to avoid the Acc. Dragon after 1.Nf3 is not playing c2-c4. After 1.Nf3 c5 2.g3 g6 3.Bg2 Bg7 4.0-0 Nc6 White will have to make a choice though.

playing this way vs  c4 or nf3 is good idea they pretty much have to go for a moroczy for a theoreticsl edge andit saves a lot of time in preparation.. However i think c4 nf3 players prefer to play maroczy than i e4 players - also you have to be careful in your move order to get the gurgenidze

I recommend meeting 1.c4 with 1...e5 2.Nc3/2.g3 Nf6 followed by a timely ...Bb4. If White postpones Nc3, play 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 c6 4.d4 Bb4.

If 1.Nf3, I recommend 1...d5 2.c4 c6/e6.

I'm an aspiring club player who has been playing the accelerated for over a year now using Andrew Greet's book as a source.  I've become fairly comfortable with the opening and consider it to be my "best" opening in my repertoire at the moment.  

   However, I have had some problems deciding what to play against 1. c4 and 1. Nf3.   Against d4 I typically setup a slav position hoping to transpose into a noteboom or stonewall so my thought was to take either my opening knowledge of the accelerated or my transpositional slav and use it against 1.Nf3 and 1.c4 since both seem to be setups that I can use against those two openings(the exception being 1.c4 for my dutch, where I instead have been trying the anglodutch), cutting down on my opening preparation time so I can focus on studying more important things.

   My first question would be , do you think it better to use my d5 setup or my accelerated dragon against  these two opening moves?  Secondly, if I do decide on the dragon against them, I'm assuming that I'll be playing against a maroczy bind.  I generally play the gurgendize system against a normal bind resulting from e4.  How do the moves differ when playing it against 1.c4 and 1.Nf3?  What sort of differences and move orders would I need to look out for?