So now for something completely different?
The best way avoiding getting attacked is to begin an attack yourself ... White does not have to play that kingside fianchetto.

1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e6 4.e3 d5 (there is ...Bb4 of course and also ...Be7) 5.Nf3 c6 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.b3 intending to castle queenside might suit you. I would not call this option up to date, rather old-fashioned. Another objection might be, that you are the one who is going to sac - with g2-g4.
Anyhow, Rubinstein's Variation is not very popular (anymore? yet?), so surprise will be very likely on your side.

..or d5-d6..

In addition to the other points, I also think that today the lines in the Stonewall where the Black Queen makes a quick trip to the kingside (Qd8-e8-h5) are considered somewhat inferior, and if the Queen isn't going to the kingside then its best square is e7!  Which makes it somewhat problematic if there's already another piece sitting there (say, a Bishop that really belongs on d6 anyway).  I experimented with the Old Stonewall some and found that in a number of positions my best move seemed to be Be7-d6, which sort of tended to raise doubts about the Be7 move in the first place.

Of course, Be7 is playable (even the old Qe8-h5 lines are playable) but these really aren't the set-ups that make the Stonewall a reasonably attractive opening, because, although quite solid, they tend to be too passive if handled correctly by White.  The Modern Stonewall has both the solidity of the Old Stonewall and a reasonable amount of dynamic potential, particularly in those lines where Black fianchettos the light-squared Bishop.

        - Geof

There is also some line with Nbd2 and a quick Ne5 which is supposed to be very good against the ....Be7 lines and is impossible after ...Bd6 because e5 is en prise. I forget the exact order, but it's in Khalifman and also my own great work Starting Out 1 d4.

So the change between the Bd6 and a Knight Ne5 is good for Blak, isn't it?
Is it true by a general point of view ?? It looks strange exchange my best Bishop with a Knight that white
can easily re-create by Nb1-d2-f3 , if he wants.

Pretty much. b3 systems work better against ...Be7 and so does the Nbd2 stuff.

Bf4 was once thought to be the theoretical problem with ...Bd6. As I understand it this, while still critical, is not thought quite so fearsome. The weakening of White's king is more annoying than it might seem.

I don't know that there is an expert consensus on how exactly to meet the ...Bd6 Stonewall, although my GW presented an exquisitely reasoned approach based on a game Khenkin-(I think) Vaisser.

It would be interesting to know what Kramnik thinks of it these days.

Well, one point is that you can simply meet b3 with ...Qe7. Then White has to play either Bb2 and Qc1, wasting time, or a4 a5, creating a black-squared hole on b4 and making the exchange of black-squared bishops of questionable value anyway, if he wants to play Ba3. In the former case Black can arrange things so that he hasn't yet had to castle and then meet Ba3 with a double exchange and ...Ke7, achieving easy equality according to Kramnik's famous article in 'Opening Preparation'.

Basically ...Bd6 must be better unless Bf4 is a good move. d6 is just a better square; aiming at e5 and not taking the queen's square. Once methods were found against Bf4 Bxf4; gxf4, ...Be7 went out of fashion.

There is also some line with Nbd2 and a quick Ne5 which is supposed to be very good against the ....Be7 lines and is impossible after ...Bd6 because e5 is en prise. I forget the exact order, but it's in Khalifman and also my own great work Starting Out 1 d4.