Quote:Junior 10 and Hiarcs 11 easily refute black's attack
Do they give a winning line or is the evaluation just stable (lets say about + 2,0 / +2.5 for White)? If its the second case then they position should be evaluated as unclear or dynamically balanced and not as lost.
If you have a clear winning line for White please post it - I played around with my program (shredder 11) after 20...g4 and the comp just made typical "I dont have a plan" - moves: Like moving knigth forward and backward.
I'd like to give a second sample variation to show what I mean: 20...g4 21.Qd1 (stopping f3-ideas for the moment and preferred by the comp giving +2.5 here!)
a6 22.Na3 h5 23.Nc5 (this is
not the move the comp wants to play - but I think the critical plan as shown at the beginning of this thread - shredder wants Nb1

))
Qd6 24.Ne6 Qb6+ 25.Kh1 Bxe6 26.Rc6 Qb7 27.Rxe6 Nf8 28.Rc6 Rxc7 29.Rxc7 Qxc7 and Black is still fighting.
19...Nd5 (Dragan Glas) is an even more radical solution to the position (but I really like it...) - giving up another pawn but opening up the diagonal for the dark squared bishop - after
20.exd5 e4 21.fxe4 g4 22.d6 Bh6 we need someone from
"Planet Shirov" around here

- if you win this with Black you get the brilliancy prize for sure
I'd also like to add, that I think it worth trying your own
White moves with the comp in this position and I am sure (cause it happens to me all the time), that you will be surprised how easy the evaluation of positions like this can change with only one move. If you for example think of the Nc5-plan and you go for
21.Nc5 -
21...f3 will follow and we are down on +1.25 for White but an attack for Black and I dare to say that White has to be very careful not to lose within the next 5-10 moves. Another natural move
22.Bd1 is already close to losing immediatly!