Depends on how many games from your repertoire Shipkov has analysed on that CD. That's something you can check yourself; I don't own it.

HoemberChess wrote on 08/04/10 at 14:00:50:

In general this repertoire is consistent. The only snag is that you'll have to learn two lines against the Stonewall: 1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 d5 (4...Be7 5.Nc3 0-0 6.Nh3 d6; 4...Bb4+) 5.Nc3 c6 6.Nh3 Bd6/Be7.
Against the Iljin-Zjenevsky (4...Be7) playing the knight to h3 is not generally considered dangerous, but it is certainly not bad either.
Any good book on the Dutch (either written from White's or Black's perspective) should do, especially in combination with a database.

The Avrukh-book is not for me, because this time I don't want my knight to go to f3 so early.

I'll raise the following question in the hope of making things clearer.

Are these move-orders against the Dutch 
consistent (in a single White repertoire)?

1.d4 f5 2.Bg5
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 f5 4.Bf4 c6 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.e3 
1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 3.g3 (when I prefer the g1N on h3 if sensible)
1.d4 d6 2.Nf3 f5 _3.Nc3_!? Nf6 4.Bg5

A piece of background information is that I want to avoid the normal Leningrad. 
(But please don't ask why.)

Is there any other way for Black to invite me into a playable version of the Dutch Defence?

You should be able to search through the Classical and Stonewall Dutch e-books yourself, and I believe Avrukh recommends g3 systems as well. Those two should be enough for you to really dig in. Good luck!