Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Chess opening classification (Read 9300 times)
gwnn
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 472
Joined: 03/21/11
Chess opening classification
05/02/12 at 08:06:16
Post Tools
barnaby wrote on 05/02/12 at 06:56:30:
Markovich wrote on 05/02/12 at 00:15:49:
Actually though, I maintain that the Triangle system is not a Semi-Slav at all, but a variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined, with c6 being played on move three.. That is how it arises in a large majority of cases.

Why indeed would you play 2...c6 if you were intending to play this?


Some would argue that the entire Slav complex is itself merely a large branch of the Queen's Gambit declined and in some books I own it is certainly handled that way. (Lars Schandorff for example!)

Either way, this new Triangle book is great ... very objective.  

I bought it for the White side and have not been disappointed.  Very dense analysis (which I enjoy).

Strange, so in this supposed classification it is only QGD vs QGA? Kind of like Open vs Closed Spanish, even though the Open Spanish is a much smaller variation compared to the whole opening. But what makes you think that Schandorff treats the Slav complex in this way? The only thing he does is have a small section with the title QGD in the semi-slav chapter, but that is because Black can transpose back to some passive non-exchange QGD lines from the 5 Bg5 Semi-Slav.

Anyway, there is no easy answer to the question 'what is the semi-slav?' - there are lines which are clearly semi-slav, such as the Moscow/Anti-Moscow, Meran/Anti-Meran, but the Triangle for example? Who knows? The title of the Scherbakov book would suggest he thinks the Triangle is a kind of Semi-Slav ("... and other semi-slav lines") but it is not clear.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo