Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3 (Read 19324 times)
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 462
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #28 - 11/02/06 at 07:37:44
Post Tools
Uberdecker wrote on 10/31/06 at 12:08:43:
Sorry to be a spoilsport,

Thank you for the witty example!  You are not a "spoilsport"-- i meant to stir up discussion, not to seek credit or attributions.  Which is why my first line was, "Hi I am a patzer rated 1720".  Nimzo's idea of Nc6-e7-g6 is logical.  I do think that f7-f5 is sounder when White has blown a tempo on c2-c3, since (as i understand it), the way for white to undermine a stonewall setup is with c2-c4 and rook play on the c-file.

I know C.Wisnewski has opined that 4.e3 is white's best, though i don't know the basis for that opinion.
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2928
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #27 - 10/31/06 at 12:34:54
Post Tools
Wasn´t there a game on one of the updates recently with 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.e3!? It all ended up rosy for WHite, although hard to believe this is cutting edge stuff!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uberdecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 641
Joined: 03/21/06
Re: Chigorin-Stonewall (?)
Reply #26 - 10/31/06 at 12:08:43
Post Tools
Sorry to be a spoilsport, but the idea of reaching a favourable Stonewall structure via a Chigorin move-order is at least over a century old ! I am refrerring to the very first Tarrasch-Nimzowitsch encounter (Nuremberg, 1904) : 

[b]1. d4 d5 ; 2. c4 Ktc6 ; 3. Ktf3 Bg4 ; 4. e3 e6 ; 5. Ktc3 Bxg4 [/b]"Quite possibly a bad move, but bearing in mind what follows what a beautiful challenge! 'I couldn't care less about the theory of lost tempi!' That is what this move says. Black does not fear to spare White the move h3 since he wants to know whether White will recapture on -f3 with Q or pawn." -Nimzo ; [b]6. Qxf3 [/b]"After the recapture with the pawn, White's centre would forfeit much of its expansion potential." Typically without further comment or any variations to justify Black's decision on move 5 -UD ; [b]6. ...Ktce7 [/b]"So, the pursuit of the primitive (i.e. mate) appealed to my eighteen-year-old point of view. In fact, Black acheives a good position by novel means and what arose from my revolutionary logic was the transposition from one opening to another." -Nimzo ; [b]7. Bd3 c6 ; 8. 0-0 f5 ; 9. Bd2 Ktf6[/b] "By playing ...Qd7 followed by ...Kth6, ...Ktg6 and ...Bd6, Black could, in my opinion have acheived a satisfactory Stonewall setup. After the text, Black is faced with a sea of troubles"-Nimzo ; [b]10. cd cd[/b] "Here I adhered too closely to my blockading principles. Now I would play 10. ...ed with the idea 11. Bxf5 Ktxf5 ; 12. Qxf5 Bd6 and so on. Black would continue by developing his Q and QR on the K-file which would place severe obstacles in the path of White's conversion of his extra pawn. It was at this point that Tarrasch made use of his own 'stratagem" -Nimzo. "Tarrasch, folding his arms across his chest, suddenly made the following pronouncement :'[i]Never[/i] in my life have I had such a [i]won game[/i] after ten moves as I have now!' " -Nimzo.

Black gradually built a strong attack for his pawn, but on the 27th move let the win slip by inaccurate calculation. The game ended in a draw.


source : Keene/Aron Nimzowitsch : A Reappraisal
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 462
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #25 - 10/25/06 at 15:49:58
Post Tools
Christoph,

Of course i know this is not a new invention.  I couldn't find any analysis of it so i put some together for myself.

Funny you mention that game because I included that game in the PGN that i put together.

PGN:
http://s95395959.onlinehome.us/public/chess/openings/B%20%21_chigorin/chigorin%2...

BTW, I look forward to your book for Everyman, "1...Nc6"
Smiley
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #24 - 10/25/06 at 05:19:43
Post Tools
This idea is not new to me. I played this way against Hort at the German Ch in 2005.

I can give you the game for now, although it currently is not annotated. Maybe I'll get around to annotate it sooner or later...

Hort,V (2524) - Wisnewski,C (2409) [D02]
GER ch 2005

1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bf4 Bg4 4.Nbd2 e6 5.c3 Bd6 6.Bg3 f5 7.e3 Nh6 8.Qb3 Rb8 9.Bxd6 cxd6 10.c4 Bxf3 11.gxf3 dxc4 12.Bxc4 d5 13.Bb5 0-0 14.f4 Na5 15.Qb4 a6 16.Be2 Nc6 17.Qa3 Rc8 18.Nf3 Qa5+ 19.Qxa5 Nxa5 20.Ne5 Nf7 21.Nd7 Rfe8 22.Nc5 Nd6 23.Bd3 Re7 24.Ke2 Kf7 25.Rhc1 Rec7 26.b3 Nc6 27.Kd1 a5 28.a3 Nb8 29.Na4 Nd7 30.Rxc7 Rxc7 31.Rc1 Rxc1+ 32.Kxc1 b6 ½-½

  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 462
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Chigorin-Stonewall (?)
Reply #23 - 10/24/06 at 23:44:49
Post Tools
Hi, I am a patzer rated 1720 USCF.  I picked up the Chigorin QGD but soon discovered that most 1.d4 players at my (low) level play the dull and somewhat unimaginative COLLE and LONDON systems.

I noticed that Colle & London (esp. the move c2-c3) are not effective against the Dutch defence and so I wondered if Black could go for a Dutch setup with a Chigorin move-order.  Having played 1...d5, the only available Dutch structure is the Stonewall.

I consulted Bronznik (English ed.) and Lane (IBMCO:B) but neither book covers the idea (early f7-f5) in any depth.

So i attempted some analysis on my own, and posted the result:
http://s95395959.onlinehome.us/public/chess/openings/B%20%21_chigorin/chigorin%2...

I know that IM's and GM's post here and I am only B-class.  So I am not under any illusions about this analysis being "correct".  I only offer it as food for thought and i'd be interested to hear stronger players' reactions to the idea.

Thx.
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jonathan Tait
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 617
Location: Nottingham
Joined: 07/11/06
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #22 - 07/13/06 at 06:10:42
Post Tools
alumbrado wrote on 05/07/03 at 04:22:15:
There is another option for White after 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 - namely 3.Bg5!? - compared with the line 1.d4 d5 2.Bg5?! Black can't now play ...c6 or ...c5 and ...Qb6 to embarrass the b2 pawn.

As well as being a pretty good move, it seems not to have been mentioned anywhere as far as I can see and would certainly annoy me if I were trying to reach the Chigorin woth Black!


I've generally just ignored it and played 3...Bf5, 4...Qd7
possibly Black will follow up with ...f6, and maybe ...e5 if White has thrown in c4
3...Bf5 nearly always gets a look up though, as opponents find being ignored a bit disconcerting

Smiley
  

blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #21 - 08/26/05 at 12:12:18
Post Tools

@CWisnewski

Danke Schoen, 
Cpacibo Bolshoi,
Grazie, 
Gracias, 
Merci, 

And so on...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bulgroz
Junior Member
**
Offline


EVIV BULGROZ !

Posts: 65
Location: Paris
Joined: 01/03/05
Gender: Male
re: Fernando Semprun
Reply #20 - 08/26/05 at 09:49:51
Post Tools
If you feel at ease with english rather than german, you should consider buying Bronznik's book on the subject "The Chigorin Defence". It has just been released in july, and it's an updated version of the previous book published in german.

Look at the review at Chesscafe web site by Hansen (http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen72.pdf). It's quite good !
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #19 - 08/26/05 at 07:35:17
Post Tools
The annotations now have been translated.

See above for the game!
  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #18 - 08/26/05 at 00:14:20
Post Tools
@all

You are right, it is about time that I translate my annotations Smiley

I will do so in the next few days.
  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
castlerock
God Member
*****
Offline


Erro Ergo Sum

Posts: 842
Location: Chennai
Joined: 02/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #17 - 08/25/05 at 23:34:23
Post Tools
Cwisnewski,

If I am not asking for too much, could you translate the annotation in English and post it? Preferrably in a pgn friendly form. Or else, cut and paste technology will always come in handy and so no worry there. Wink

Thanks
  

CastleRock
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #16 - 08/25/05 at 22:37:04
Post Tools
@Cwisnewski, 

Hi, 

It's been a couple of months since you mentioned a possible translation to English in this line.  Have there been any new developments that we need to know about?

Also, is 1...d5 2...Nc6 a good way to meet the Catalan?  Your notes seem to suggest it is.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #15 - 06/23/05 at 09:10:47
Post Tools
EDIT: --- The game annotations are now in English ---

Another game I played with the Chigorin. This game is from the last season in the German Bundesliga and shows how Black can achieve a good game against 3. g3 if White plays careless (Again, annotations are in german, but I shall translate them as soon as there is time, and given there is interest):

Krasenkow,M (2676) - Wisnewski,C (2392) [A00]
German Bundesliga (9), 30.01.2005

1.Ng1-f3 Nb8-c6 2.d2-d4 d7-d5 3.g2-g3 Bc8-g4 4.Bf1-g2 e7-e6 5.c2-c3?! 

A passive move, which is unable to guarantee any opening advantage [5.c2-c4 is normal here and should be played if White wants to achieve any advantage, although I believe that Black can equalize. This can be done with 5...Bf8-d6! in order to keep control of e5. Possible continuations are: (5...Ng8-f6? 6.Nf3-e5! gives Black problems.) 6.0-0 Ng8-f6 7.Nb1-c3 (7.b2-b3 0-0 8.Bc1-b2 Nf6-e4 9.Nb1-c3 (9.Nf3-e1 Bg4-h5 10.Nb1-d2 f7-f5 11.Ne1-d3 a7-a5! with black initiative.) 9...f7-f5!? 10.c4xd5 e6xd5 11.Nc3xd5 Bd6xg3 12.h2xg3 Qd8xd5 with a good game for black thanks to his control of the light squares; 7...0-0 (Not 7...Nf6-e4? because of 8.c4xd5 e6xd5 9.Qd1-b3±) 8.c4xd5 (8.Bc1-g5 d5xc4 9.Qd1-a4 (9.e2-e4? Bd6-e7 and d4 is completely weak.) 9...h7-h6 10.Bg5xf6 (10.Bg5-c1 Nf6-d5 11.Qa4xc4 Nc6-a5 12.Qc4-d3 Nd5-b4 13.Qd3-d1 Na5-c4 also gives active play for Black.) 10...Qd8xf6=+; 8...Nf6xd5 9.e2-e4 Nd5-b6 10.b2-b3 (10.Bc1-e3 Nb6-c4=) 10...Bd6-b4 11.Bc1-b2 f7-f5! and the white centre is about to get busted.] 

5...Bf8-d6 6.Qd1-b3 Ra8-b8 

This move is typical for various systems where White plays Qb3. Black protects his b-pawn and moves his rook away from the h1-a8 diagonal. Additionally, a possible advance ...b7-b5-b4 can be an idea in certain positions.

7.0-0 Ng8-f6 8.Bc1-g5 h7-h6 9.Bg5xf6 Qd8xf6 10.Nb1-d2 0-0 11.e2-e4 Bg4xf3!? 

It seems that Krasenkov, who played quite fast up til now, underestimated this move.

12.Bg2xf3 

[12.Nd2xf3 seems better. White does not have much after 12...d5xe4 13.Nf3-d2 Rf8-d8 14.Nd2xe4 Qf6-e7 but at least Black has not been able to fully equalize yet.] 

12...d5xe4 13.Bf3xe4 e6-e5= 

The opening phase is complete, Black has equalized.

14.d4-d5?! 

It is understandable that my opponent, with an ELO plus of nearly 300 points, is not happy with a draw being White. Yet, it is dangerous for White to continue in this fashion [14.d4xe5 Nc6xe5 15.Nd2-c4 Ne5xc4 16.Qb3xc4 is one possibility how the position can completely dry out.] 

14...Nc6-e7 15.c3-c4 b7-b6=+ 

The structure that has arisen satisfied me. Black was able to build up a successful blockade on the dark squares to keep the white pawn majority on the queen side from advancing, while chances on the kingside, especially through a possible advance ...f7-f5 are retained.

16.Be4-c2 Ne7-c8?+= 

I was angry about this maneuver when my opponent played his next move. Originally I intended to transfer my Bishop to c5 in order to free d6 for my Knight, but there is a lack of time [16...Qf6-g5!=+ with the idea ...f7-f5 is much better. After 17.Nd2-e4 Qg5-g6 18.Ne4xd6 (otherwise Black can even take with the c-pawn on d6 after ...f7-f5)  18...Qg6xd6 followed by ...f7-f5 and ...e5-e4, the black knight is superior to the white bishop] 

17.Ra1-e1 a7-a5 

I invested 45 minutes into this move without getting any further. I hoped to gain some time, since I thought that my opponent had to react to Bb4 (with the "threat" of trading the bishop on d2 for the knight) with a3. [Originally I planned 17...Qf6-d8?, which was the reason why I played  16...Nc8 spielte. I wanted to play ...f7-f5 and that Qf6 again. But now I realised that 18.Nd2-f3! would be very strong since Black has problems to protect his e-pawn. (18.Qb3-f3 to prevent ...f7-f5 is good as well.) 18...Qd8-f6 (18...Rf8-e8 19.c4-c5! Bd6xc5 20.Nf3xe5±; 18...Qd8-e7 19.Qb3-e3 Rf8-e8 20.Bc2-a4±) 19.c4-c5! Bd6xc5 20.Nf3xe5±] 

18.Nd2-e4?? 

This move (and the idea that comes with it) is utterly dreadful. [After 18.a2-a3 I certainly would have tried 18...Ld6-c5. White wins a pawn after (18...Qf6-g5? 19.Nd2-f3 Qg5-h5 20.Qb3-d3 g7-g6 21.Bc2-d1!± is not what I wanted.) 19.Nd2-e4 Qf6-e7 20.Ne4xc5 Qe7xc5 21.Re1xe5 but at least Black can coordinate his forces and has the better minor piece 21...Sc8-d6 with a better position for White.] 

18...Qf6-e7 

Now Black can play his long planned advance ...f7-f5 without being forced to take care about e5. 

19.f2-f4 

Nearly forced. White cannot allow Black to gain space with ...f7-f5 and ...e5-e4.

19...e5xf4 20.Qb3-d3 f7-f5 21.Ne4xd6 Qe7xd6 22.Rf1xf4 Qd6-c5+ 23.Kg1-g2 

[23.Dd3-e3 does not force Black to trade, he can play 23...Nc8-d6! instead. The pawn structure on the queen side will be slightly weakened, but White cannot exploit this. Black will trade rooks and retain a clear advantage in the upcoming minor piece ending. 24.Qe3xc5 b6xc5 25.b2-b3 Rf8-f6 with the idea Kf8 and Re8] 

23...Nc8-d6=+ 

Black has everything was he has ever dreamed of. The white pawns on the queen side are completely blocked, and he has the superior minor piece.

24.g3-g4?! 

In beginning time trouble White loses the thread. [After 24.Re1-e6 b6-b5 (24...Rb8-e8 25.Qd3-e2 Re8xe6 26.Qe2xe6+ Kg8-h8 27.Bc2xf5 is nothing for Black.) 25.c4xb5 Rb8xb5 26.Bc2-b3 Rb5-b4 27.Rf4xb4 Qc5xb4=+ Black still needs to show some technique, as it is not easy to reach the white king in this line.] 

24...b6-b5!-/+ 

"A very strong move", as annotator GM Hort mentioned in the live coverage. The white position now collapses.

25.c4xb5 

[25.g4xf5? b5xc4-+] 

25...Rb8xb5 26.g4xf5 

[26.b2-b3 does not help either 26...Rb5-b4! 27.Re1-f1 (27.Rf4xb4? Qc5xb4 with attack on e1 and g4.) 27...Rf8-e8 and Black gains control of the e-file: 28.g4xf5 Re8-e3 29.Qd3-d2 Re3-e5 30.f5-f6 Re5-g5+ 31.Kg2-h3 (31.Kg2-h1? Rb4xf4 32.Qd2xf4 (32.Rf1xf4 Qc5-g1#) 32...Qc5xd5+-+; 31...Rg5xd5-+] 

26...Rb5xb2 27.Re1-e2 Rf8-e8 28.Re2xe8+ 

[After 28.Rf4-f2 Re8xe2 29.Rf2xe2 Qc5-c4! there are just to many weaknesses.] 

28...Nd6xe8 29.Rf4-c4 Qc5-e7 30.a2-a4 Qe7-g5+ 31.Kg2-h3 

An uncomfortable position with two minutes left for ten moves. The king will be hunted down soon, but it shows that other moves are no better. [31.Kg2-h1 Rb2-a2! 32.Qd3-d1 (32.Qd3-c3 Qg5-c1+ 33.Kh1-g2 Ra2-a1-+ and Black storms the back door) 32...Qg5-f6! 33.Qd1-e2 Ne8-d6 34.Rc4-f4 Kg8-h8 with a crumbling position for White.; 
31.Qd3-g3? Qg5-d2+ 32.Qg3-f2 (32.Kg2-h1 Rb2xc2-+) 32...Qd2xd5+ 33.Rc4-e4 Ne8-f6-+] 

31...Ne8-f6 32.Qd3-f3 Qg5-d2 33.Qf3-c3 

[33.Qf3-d3 Qd2xd3+ 34.Bc2xd3 Nf6xd5-+ and Black trades initiative for a winning material advantage.] 

33...Qd2-c1!? 

[33...Qd2xc3+ 34.Qc4xc3 Nf6xd5 35.Bc2-b3 Rb2-d2 is also possible, but I was not in the mood for a rook ending.] 

34.Rc4xc7?? 

The final mistake. [34.Qc3-d3 is the only move to keep the game going, but defence remains difficult: 34...Qc1-g1 and White has probems to avoid Zugzwang (!). 35.Qd3-f3 Rb2-a2 36.Qf3-d3 (36.Rc4xc7?? Ra2-a3!-+) 36...Ra2-a1! with the idea ...Ta1-f1 to prevent the white queen from accessing f3.] 

34...Dc1-f1+ 

White resigned in view of 34...Qc1-f1+ 35.Kh3-g3 (35.Kh3-h4 Qf1-f4+ 36.Kh4-h3 Qf4-g4#) 35...Qf1-g1+ 36.Kg3-f3 Qg1-g4+ 37.Kf3-e3 (37.Kf3-f2 Nf6-e4+-+) 37...Nf6xd5+-+

0-1
« Last Edit: 08/26/05 at 07:34:27 by IM Christoph Wisnewski »  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #14 - 06/20/05 at 14:21:19
Post Tools
Ok, I reviewed the line Sulava played against me in Cappelle La Grande 2001. He did not take on c6, so I am afraid I cannot give any more insight (yet). 

I am sure that I have had some experience on the internet (ICC), but did not have the time yet to dig some games up (will do later when I am at home again).

Nevertheless, I will post my game against Sulava. In my opinion, Black comfortably equalized after 7...e5

Sulava,N [2526] - Wisnewski,C [2328] [D02]
Cappelle La Grande 2001 (1), 24.02.2001

1.Sg1-f3 Sb8-c6 2.d2-d4 d7-d5 3.e2-e3 Lc8-g4 4.Lf1-b5 e7-e6 5.Sb1-d2 Sg8-e7 6.c2-c3 a7-a6 7.Lb5-d3 e6-e5 8.h2-h3 Lg4xf3 9.g2xf3 g7-g6 10.h3-h4 h7-h5 11.f3-f4 e5-e4 12.Ld3-c2 b7-b5 13.f2-f3 Se7-f5 14.Ke1-f2 Lf8-e7 15.f3xe4 Le7xh4+ 16.Kf2-f3 d5xe4+ 17.Lc2xe4 Dd8-f6 18.Le4-d5 g6-g5 19.Sd2-e4 g5-g4+ 20.Kf3-g2 Df6-g6 21.Se4-c5 Lh4-e7 22.e3-e4 Sf5-h4+ 23.Th1xh4 Le7xh4 24.Dd1-h1 Lh4-e7 25.f4-f5 Dg6-f6 26.e4-e5 Sc6xe5 27.d4xe5 Df6xe5 28.Ld5-c6+ Ke8-d8 29.Dh1-d1+ Le7-d6 30.Lc1-g5+ f7-f6 31.Sc5-e6+ Kd8-e7 32.Lg5-f4 De5xf5 33.Lf4xd6+ c7xd6 34.Se6-d4 Df5-c8 35.Dd1-e2+ Ke7-f8 36.Ta1-e1 Ta8-a7 37.De2-e8+ Dc8xe8 38.Te1xe8+ Kf8-g7 39.Sd4-e6+ Kg7-f7 40.Te8xh8 Kf7xe6 41.Th8xh5 f6-f5 42.a2-a4 b5xa4 43.Lc6xa4 Ta7-b7 44.b2-b3 Ke6-e5 45.Th5-h1 d6-d5 46.Th1-e1+ Ke5-f4 47.Te1-e6 a6-a5 48.Te6-a6 Tb7-e7 49.Ta6xa5 Te7-e2+ 50.Kg2-f1 Kf4-f3 51.Ta5xd5 Te2-f2+ 52.Kf1-e1 Tf2-e2+ 53.Ke1-d1 f5-f4 54.La4-c6 Kf3-f2 55.Td5-g5 Te2-e1+ 56.Kd1-d2 Te1-e2+ 57.Kd2-d3 g4-g3 58.Tg5-g4 f4-f3 59.b3-b4 g3-g2 60.b4-b5 Te2-e1 61.c3-c4 g2-g1D 62.Tg4xg1 Te1xg1 63.c4-c5 Kf2-g3 64.Lc6xf3 Kg3xf3 65.b5-b6 Tg1-d1+ 66.Kd3-c4 Kf3-e4 67.c5-c6 Td1-c1+ 68.Kc4-b5 Ke4-d5 69.c6-c7 Kd5-d6 70.Kb5-a6 Tc1xc7 71.b6xc7 Kd6xc7 ½-½
  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #13 - 06/19/05 at 03:52:21
Post Tools
Sulava played this line (or something similar) against me in Cappelle La Grande 2001.

I obtained a superior position after the opening but in the end "only" achieved a draw (although at this time that was a big achievement, since I only had 2320 at this time and he was being rated 2530).

I am not at home (again), but will be tomorrow. I can dig up the game then and post it here, maybe it will give some insights.
  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
FightingDragon
Senior Member
****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 267
Joined: 05/12/04
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #12 - 06/18/05 at 19:41:26
Post Tools
I agree that black should castle short against 3.g3, with good prospects.
On 3.e3!? however, I have to add something:
3.e3 Bg4 4.Bb5 e6 now Christoph thinks that black should play Nge7, g6 and Bg7.
But 4.Bc6:!? was played several times by Sulava (until he lost to Brynell).
That game went 4. ... bc6: 5.c4 Bf3: (it seems to be clear now that Knights are superior to bishops  Wink) 6.gf3: (why not 6.Qf3? Anyway, black seems to be OK after c5) c5 and black shouldn't have problems.
But there are other tries for white:
4.h3 seems to be quite annoying, on 4. ... Bh5 white plays 5.c4 e6 6.Nc3 Nf6 7.g4! Bg6 8.Nh4 Bb4 9.Ng6: hg6: 10.Bg2 
and white has some pressure.
Should black play 4. ... Bf3: 5.Qf3: e5 6.Bb5 Qd6 like Hector 
did in his game against Grant?
His play seemed to be quite adventurous there.
Other tries are not that dangerous.
Against 4.Nbd2, the game Dizdarevic-Fercec is a wonderful display of blacks chances in this type of position:

[Event "Bizovac Metalis op 12th"]
[Site "Bizovac"]
[Date "2005.02.24"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Dizdarevic,Emir"]
[Black "Fercec,Nenad"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Eco "D02"]
1.Nf3 d5 2.e3 Nc6 3.d4 Bg4 4.Nbd2 e6 5.h3 Bh5 6.a3 Nf6 7.c4 Be7 8.b4 0-0 
9.Bb2 Ne4 10.Be2 f5 11.0-0 Bf6 12.Rc1 Ne7 13.b5 Kh8 14.a4 Bxf3 15.Nxf3 Ng6 16.Qc2 Rc8 
17.Nd2 Bg5 18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Rcd1 c6 20.bxc6 bxc6 21.Bc3 Bh6 22.g3 Nh4 23.Rb1 Qg5 24.Rb7 Nf3+ 
25.Kg2 Nh4+ 26.Kh1 Nf3 27.Qd1 f4 28.exf4 Rxf4 29.gxf4 Qf5 30.Kg2 Nh4+ 0-1
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #11 - 06/16/05 at 11:45:06
Post Tools
I concur, the line with 3...Bg4 and 4...Qd7 followed by ...0-0-0 is dangerous for Black.

However, Black can play differently. A nice setup is 3...Bg4 4.Bg2 e6!, e.g. 5.0-0 Bd6 (but NOT 5...Nf6? when 6.Ne5! is annoying) followed by Nf6. Depending on White's (re-)action, Black can, in my opinion, achieve a good game.
  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
Semkov
Guest


Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #10 - 06/16/05 at 04:59:58
Post Tools
I'd like to warn Black players - do not underestimate the line 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.g3!? I also thought "what a nice way to get an attacking position with Black" and ventured into that line. You can see the result: 
White "Spassov, Liuben"]
[Black "Semkov, Semko"
1992
1. Nf3 d5 2. g3 Nc6?! 3. d4 Bg4 4. Bg2 Qd7 5. c4! e6 (5... dxc4 6. d5 with initiative) 6. O-O
O-O-O 7. Be3 Nge7 8. Nbd2 f6 9. b4! Nxb4 10. Rb1 Na6 11. Qb3 c6 12. Qa4 Nf5 13. Bf4 g5 14. Qxa6 gxf4 15. Qxa7 Qc7 16. cxd5 exd5 17. Rfc1 fxg3 18. hxg3 Bh6 19.
Rb2 Rde8 20. Nh2 Bxe2 21. Bh3 Bd3 22. Rc3 Be3 23. Ndf1 Rhg8 24. Bxf5+ Bxf5 25.Rxe3 Rxe3 26. Nxe3 Be4 27. Qa8+ Qb8 28. Qxb8+ Kxb8 29. Nhf1 1-0
I'm affraid, this line is just better for White.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IM Christoph Wisnewski
Full Member
***
Offline


International Master

Posts: 195
Location: Kiel
Joined: 04/03/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #9 - 06/15/05 at 04:29:25
Post Tools
I started playing the Chigorin Defence in 1999 after I have discovered the (at this time) terrific book by Dunnington.

I still use it as my only weapon against 1.d4, and even at a higher master level it served me quite well. I frequently use it even against IMs/GMs, and last season in the German Bundesliga I drew GM Gabriel (in a winning position, grr), lost to GM Nyback (but only after I blundered in an equal position) and beat GM Krasenkov (2671).   

I hope not to sound too confident (and I certainly do not want to brag with my results; I just want to give you an idea what a powerful weapon Chigorin can be), but I dare to consider myself an expert of this opening. Here are my two cents for the things already being mentioned.

First of all, I do think, too, that Black should play 2...Nc6! after 2.Nf3 - Although I do think that the best way for White to continue is 3.e3!? ... but I will cover this later.

Numerous possibilities have been mentioned here, which I will refer to one by one (Since 3.c4 transposes to main lines, I won't say anything about that in this topic):

3.Bf4

This line seems to be feared by some players, but just because it seems to be boring. Well, in a way it is, but in the same way it is just White giving up any hopes for an advantage. It is too much to describe the best setup, but I took the time to write a little summary with a few annotated games on my homepage. Unfortunately it is only in german, but it should be easy enough to understand. The link is:

http://www.schachmaterialien.de/Tschigorin/einleitungt0.htm

3.Bg5

I consider this a waste of time. Black can reply 3...f6! and obtain a good game. After 4.Bf4 Black gained a precious tempo after 4...Bg4 - f6 does not weaken the position but rather helps to support the important break ...e7-e5. White can't play 5.e3?? (5...e5 wins a piece) nor 5.Nbd2? (5...Nxd4 followed by ...e5 gives black an excellent game).

White can do 4.Bh4, but as already mentioned Black has the possibility of 4...Nh6 followed by ...Nf5. White is forced to retreat his bishop to g3, where it is harrassed by ...h5 (threatening ...h4). White will have to play h3 or h4 then, but after the trade on g3 the white pawn structure is severly crippled.

Finally it should be mentioned, that 3.e3!? is an interesting alternative. The idea is to play 4.Bb5! after 3...Bg4, with a possible threat of c4 followed by Qa4 and Ne5. Black has to play very carefully, I recommend a setup with ...e6 and ...Nge7 (do NOT develop the bishop to d6, it will have problems after a white c4), the bishop f8 is to be developed via g7. I haven't had much practical tests yet, but this looks interesting.
  

"Chess you don't learn, chess you understand!" (V. Korchnoi)
Back to top
WWWICQ  
IP Logged
 
FusterCluck
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 39
Location: Summerville
Joined: 05/16/04
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #8 - 09/18/04 at 16:46:34
Post Tools
I think I know a way to frustrate those solid characters.  The 3. Bf4 move is intended to block an e5 advance.  We should therfore trade it off to get an open game.

After 1. d2-d4 d7-d5 2. Ng1-f3 Nb8-c6 3. Bc1-f4 Bc8-g4 4. e2-e3 e7-e6 5. Nb1-d2 Bf8-d6   

White has 3 options:

Gary Lane recommends allowing the trade on f4 but then his 8. Qb3 only encourages an agressive queenside castle!

6.c3 Bxf4 7.exf4 Qd6 8.Qb3 O-O-O! 

If white exchanges on d6, we play to open the center with e5.

6.Bxd6 Qxd6 7.c3 Nf6 8.Bd3 e5

The retreat of the bishop to g3 looks like it strengthens our pin of the f3 knight and may lead to white not being able to castle.

6.Bg3 Bxg3 7.hxg3 Qd6 8.c3 Nf6 9.Bd3 e5
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ILS
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 32
Location: Jakarta
Joined: 06/10/04
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #7 - 08/10/04 at 09:29:19
Post Tools
I just started playing the Chigorin, and met 3.Nc3 (after 1.Nf3 Nc6 2.d4 d5) I agree with Fernando Semprun that this is boring.  In the game I became adventurous and tried to spice things up by playing 3...f5 Shocked  trying to play like the dutch...

Looks quite interesting, what do you think?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
X
God Member
*****
Offline


Education is a system
of imposed ignorance.Chomsky

Posts: 571
Joined: 10/04/03
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #6 - 10/04/03 at 14:06:53
Post Tools
I had memorable game involving a double rook sacrifice in the 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bg5 line when I was in high school:

1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bg5!? h6 4. Bh4 Bg4 5.e3 Qd7 6.h3 Bh5 7.c4 0-0-0 8. Nc3 dxc4 9.Bxc4 Nf6 10. g4 Bg6 11. Bb5 Nd5 12. Ne5 Nxc3 13. bxc3 Qd5 14. Bxc6 bxc6 15. Qa4!! Qxh1+ 16. Ke2 Qxa1 17. Qa6+ resigns (17...Kb8 18. Nxc6 Ka8 19.Qxa7#)
  

Power to the People!&&http://www.gravel2008.us/           http://www.nationalinitiative.us/&&Mike Gravel for President 2008
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Glenn Snow
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1720
Location: Franklin
Joined: 09/27/03
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #5 - 10/03/03 at 21:29:49
Post Tools
After 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bg5 is interesting.  What about 3...Qd6!? threatening ...Qb4+.  Black might be able to get in a decent ...f6 and ...e5.  Also interesting would be ...f6 and then ...Nh6.  3...h6 4.Bh4 g5 looks weakening but I'm not so sure it's that bad either.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alumbrado
God Member
*****
Offline


Esse quam videri bonus
malebo

Posts: 1418
Location: London
Joined: 02/17/03
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #4 - 05/07/03 at 04:22:15
Post Tools
There is another option for White after 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nc6 - namely 3.Bg5!? - compared with the line 1.d4 d5 2.Bg5?! Black can't now play ...c6 or ...c5 and ...Qb6 to embarrass the b2 pawn.

As well as being a pretty good move, it seems not to have been mentioned anywhere as far as I can see and would certainly annoy me if I were trying to reach the Chigorin woth Black!

As a d4 player who often uses a 1.Nf3 move order, I ahve noticed that a surprising number of people play 1...Nc6, and I get this position quite often in blitz games at any rate.
  

If sometimes we fly too close to the sun, at least this shows we are spreading our wings.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Flanker
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 12
Location: Charlotte
Joined: 04/14/03
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #3 - 05/06/03 at 15:28:29
Post Tools
I'm not so sure about 3.Nc3...never seen it played.  Dunnington's book has the reply to 3.Bf4.  I know Black plays 3...Bg4, but unsure how it expands from there as it's been 4 years since I've played the Black side, and as White, I'd play 3.c4 (I have had a couple of tournament games start 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nc6 3.c4 Bg4, and now, instead of 4.cxd5, I'm beginning to look at 4.Nc3).

The book I have that I use at this point for the Chigorin doesn't cover 3.Bf4 as it's a reportoire book for White (Opening for White According to Kramnik, Volume 4).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fernando Semprun
Senior Member
****
Offline


Be nice to others. Life
is to be enjoyed!

Posts: 402
Location: Madrid
Joined: 04/29/03
Gender: Male
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #2 - 05/06/03 at 14:08:37
Post Tools
Thanks! 

I've got Dunnington's book on the Catalan, and having recently bought my first German book (Tschetverik and Raetsky on the Catalan) I thought about geting their book on the Chigorin, also recommended by Watson

(Although my German is very basic, it is true that one can follow the book without much trouble)

What is black plan after something really boring like 3.Nc3, Bf4 , e3 , Be2 and 0-0? Wink
  

Fernando Semprun
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Flanker
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 12
Location: Charlotte
Joined: 04/14/03
Re: Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
Reply #1 - 05/06/03 at 13:21:33
Post Tools
I played the Chigorin back in 1999.  Black should play 2...Nc6!  If White replies 3.c4, you have transposed to the 3.Nf3 variations of the Chigorin.  Otherwise, White really has only 2 legitimate replies aside from 3.c4, those being 3.Bf4 and 3.g3, neither of which cause Black any problems provided he knows the lines.  They are both quite insipid (kinda like the 3.Nf3 Bg4 4.e3 lines).  While the book is now 7 years old, I still would recommend getting Angus Dunnington's book on the Chigorin Queen's Gambit if you haven't gotten it yet.  It gives some brief coverage of what to do when White doesn't comply.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fernando Semprun
Senior Member
****
Offline


Be nice to others. Life
is to be enjoyed!

Posts: 402
Location: Madrid
Joined: 04/29/03
Gender: Male
Chigorin players vs 2.Nf3
05/06/03 at 12:39:56
Post Tools
I have recently noticed that the Chigorin might be very interesting. Before embarking in any serious study, one BIG question:

What about if white doesnot play 2.c4 but, say 2.Nf3?

What is a Chigorin player supposed to do?

Thanks
  

Fernando Semprun
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo