Normal Topic A question and thank you to G.M Prie. (Read 2438 times)
GMEricPrie
Full Member
***
Offline


"The most simple moves
are the less complicated"

Posts: 145
Location: France
Joined: 06/18/03
Gender: Male
Re: A question and thank you to G.M Prie.
Reply #1 - 12/03/04 at 06:29:18
Post Tools
I already answered that question Teyko. You just cannot give a central pawn like that. 
I understand you have demonstrated that White was better everywhere (I use your words Smiley) in the 1.d4 d5 BDG apart from the Lemberber, the Ziegler, The Vienna, The Gunderam, the Bogoljubov, the Teichmann, the Langheincke...
So I suggested you play 3.Bg5 against the order of moves 1...Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 and after 3...Nbd7 4.Qd3 like GM Jonny Hector with the idea e2-e4 and without giving the pawn this time. Quite possibly it reaches no more than equality but an equality that will suit your 'style' without everything to change in your repertoire.

By the (naive) way, if you find any opening where White is better, so slightly may it be, in every line you have a great future as a second at the highest level !

I like Patrik's approach about the Rasmussen, but I have had a bit of a BDG indigestion recently Smiley and I need to split my work on the Lemberger clearly into 4 parts ( 5.dxe5 and miscellaneous; 5.Qh5, 5.Nxe4 and the Hübsch) so I will get back to him when that preliminary phase is over.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
A question and thank you to G.M Prie.
12/02/04 at 17:29:49
Post Tools
Dear G.M Prie,

First I would like to thank you for the game posted on the forum. You appeared to be more than gracious in your account of the Blackmar Diemar. 

Second, I am curious as to what you would suggest for me and other Blackmar Diemar gambit players on white, rather than the Blackmar Diemar.

I am also curious to know whether or not you believed the analysis sumbitted by Patrik on the Lemberger. It has long been believed that the Sneider's variation was inferior to the Rasmussen attack. 

Lastly, I am curious to know whether or not you would change the evaluation in the BDG in this line 

1.d4 Nf6 2. Nc3 d5 3.e4?! 

from (?!) to (!?) if a playable line is found that gives white some chances in the Huebsch Gambit?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo