Normal Topic Books on Queen's Gambit (Read 7151 times)
lnn2
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1504
Location: nc
Joined: 09/22/04
Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #9 - 04/17/05 at 23:12:48
Post Tools
Play the Queen's Gambit (Everyman) by Chris Ward is announced for March 06. Probably this means we will have a repertoire book based on exchange QGD... although i'm not really sure what ward plays against the slav/semi slav. 

Anyone with insider information on this?  Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Alias
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1512
Location: East of the river Svartån
Joined: 11/19/04
Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #8 - 04/14/05 at 08:40:57
Post Tools
In some openings theory changes rapidly and the books covering it soon becomes obsolete, at least when it comes to the "hot" variations. 10 years ago, the Sveshnikov was seldom played at top level. (At least that's my impression from reading the list of  variations played in the tournament which lead to the "Sicilian Love" book.)  A well written "old" book can still be very useful for the general understanding of an opening. I haven't read Sveshinkov's own book from 1989, but I've been told it's still an excellent read.

The QGD hasn't changed very much. It's only the Bf4 line that seems evolve. 

You can do updates of the theory yourself with new games from TWIC or other sources, but it's very helpful with books that do that. Really good books also include plenty of original analysis, something which saves the reader a lot of work.
  

Don't check me with no lightweight stuff.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10778
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #7 - 04/14/05 at 05:57:21
Post Tools
I agree with Inn2 and do not understand the need to buy a new book on an opening every two or three years. With these three sources one only has to do a regular download and check if there are new ideas.
In addition to playing through annotated games analyzing for yourself does a lot too - no matter what level.
My opinion, that more recent sources are not necessarily better than older ones, is well known already. Look for quality, not for quantity.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
lnn2
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1504
Location: nc
Joined: 09/22/04
Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #6 - 04/13/05 at 21:41:09
Post Tools
I recently received Dautov but truth be told he is already outdated in main lines Sad If you are a black player playing the main lines (either c5, or Nbd7) then you may not have the latest theory.  New in chess yearbooks and Ruslan's site here is good for that. you might also want to consider the kasparov DVD which contains a nice summary of latest ideas in 5. Bf4.

But of course the best way to study an opening is to go through as many annotated games as possible. So you might want to get the Dautov CD anyway. Furthermore the nature of QGD is such that evaluations don't change very much so latest theory is not so important. 

And if you are looking for coverage on sidelines e.g. (6...a6, 6... b6 etc) Dautov is still unbeatable. 

Overall I give it 6/10, but this is only because I already have pretty much material on 5. Bf4 from the aforementioned sources.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cma6
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 169
Location: US
Joined: 07/17/04
QGD 5 Bf4 line
Reply #5 - 04/13/05 at 20:59:50
Post Tools
In the QGD 5 Bf4 system, I have Sadler's book and Janjgava's "Queen's Gambit & Catalan for Black" and will get the Dautov 5 Bf4 CD from Chessbase, but these are all from 2000-2001. 
Is there anything more recent, especially from Black point of view?
                         Thanks, CMA
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Semko Semkov
Guest


Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #4 - 02/19/05 at 17:57:51
Post Tools
You sound like you really need Khalifman's Opening for White According to Kramnik. The "relevant" volume is 5. However it is from White's point of view and there is nothing about the Bf4 system. Khalifman recommends Bg5. If you have questions, E-mail me.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Cox
Guest


Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #3 - 02/18/05 at 18:58:29
Post Tools
Colin Crouch's book is notoriously optimistic in its coverage of the main line, and would certainly need some updating in that area, but it is full of original analysis and ideas and well worth getting for that reason if you are interested in the line.

Sadler's book is idiosyncratic: it is written in a sort of Socractic style, and on theory it is quite weak (deliberately so). I can't actually think of a really good book ever on the QGD.

Don't know about the others you mention.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alumbrado
God Member
*****
Offline


Esse quam videri bonus
malebo

Posts: 1418
Location: London
Joined: 02/17/03
Gender: Male
Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #2 - 02/18/05 at 05:25:14
Post Tools
The relevant volume of Khalifman's Opening for White According to Kramnik should cover all these lines.
  

If sometimes we fly too close to the sun, at least this shows we are spreading our wings.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
lnn2
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1504
Location: nc
Joined: 09/22/04
Re: Books on Queen's Gambit
Reply #1 - 02/18/05 at 01:15:04
Post Tools
Is there a book which discusses "miscelleneous" systems like Ragozin, VIenna, Semi-Tarrasch, Cambridge Springs etc., mainly on the White point of view? At top level these may be unpopular, and top GMs especially make the Vienna seem like a forced win for White. But some guidance for mortals is needed!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
lnn2
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1504
Location: nc
Joined: 09/22/04
Books on Queen's Gambit
02/17/05 at 11:03:02
Post Tools
So sadler is a must for qgd. Are there other good books/cds? Lalic's book on Bg5 lines came out about the same time. Is the theory still of any good?

On QGD exchange: i read a couple of good reviews of heinrich's new cd. Any other opinions?

On 5. Bf4: How do you think colin crouch's old 5. Bf4 book is holding up to current theory? Is dautov's cd complete is its coverage and is it any good now?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo