Quote:


Undoubtedly, but surely the greatest source of enjoyment in chess is in discovering and appreciating the diversity of the game.  We needn't all strive to be masters, but surely by expanding our scope of the game we must naturally expand our enjoyment of the game.

thanks for advises

@Markovich
I am somehow amazed that you recommend the Dutch Stonewall, as I read in another thread that you are engaged in teaching chess. Isnt the Stonewall exactly what teachers are warning their kids to leave hands from? Maybe I am wrong but I always thought so. Because it is not very flexible and has clear positional disadvantages and if White can exchange the strong black bishop, then blacks position seems lack of kingside attack chances and rather unattractive?

I think Willempie's remark on the solid/aggressive issue is a good answer to the initial question. I fully agree.
Why insist on one style or another? Because we amateurs have the luxury of not playing what is objectively best, but what we think is the most fun.

Quote:

I probably overstated things a bit , but with the dutch the variations with an early Qb3 or an early h4 against the Leningrad are not my cup of tea for a safe kingside position. The KI imo has the disadvantage of allowing a couple of threatening white systems like the bayonet and 4-pawns, while the Sämisch is though not very popular quite nasty to meet without thorough preparation.
I agree that the closed benoni (I assume you mean the setup c5 d6 e5) is quite safe and have played it on occasion myself, but chances for activity are quite limited if white doesnt exchange pieces and works with a "limiting scope" strategy with moves like h3. I have always looked at it as a slighty worse version of the Hübner setup in the Nimzo.
Main problem of course is to recommend something both safe and potentially agressive against d4. In my experience it is either or. Safe options are QGD, Nimzo/QID, the czech benoni. While more agressives are KID/Grünfeld (I use those myself in combination), dutch, Benko and various other systems. With the safe options the problem is that often it takes time to be able to go agressive, while the agressive ones often allow white to get agressive as well. So my personal recommendation would be to choose something safe and look for the more active variations there.

Did anybody really read his question?
He wants a  safe position and then go for the king. All the indian defenses dont do that and the dutch is a laugh for own king's safety.
The only way is d5 e6 c6 and then hope you get something going.

Another suggestion, if you want a closed position with a kingside attack....go for the English Defense:  1.d4 e6 2.c4 b6 3.e4 Bb7 and now if 4.Bd3 (the main line), instead of the wide open, wild 4...f5, play the modern main line, 4...Nc6, in which Black typlically follows up with Nb4 and Nxd3, closes up the center, and then later on decides what to do with his king.  Typically, if he goes Queenside, he does a pawnstorm on the kingside.  Otherwise, if he goes kingside, often it's timing an ...f5 move, kinda like in the King's Indian.

Black really can't insist on a closed game no matter what he does.  Against the King's Indian, which I agree is a good choice for players wanting to play a closed position with king attack, White has the 4 Pawns Attack.  Even in the Classical KID, White can play 7. Be3 instead of 7. 0-0 and the position is unlikely to lock up.

After 1. d4 Nf6  2. c4 c5, White can just play 3. Nf3, which typically results in fluid, semi-open positions, the theory of which is part of the Symmetrical English.  Further, I would assert that White does not compromise his += birthright by doing so.  This is a really good one to pull out against Benko fanatics.

Why not play a system based on 1...d5 and 2 ...e6 followed by c6 or c5 depending if white goes for c4 or not? The centre is quite static, development quite smooth and if you like the positions the Caro-Kann and especially the french might appeal against 1e4. It maybe a bit passive, but at least you dont have to worry about getting blown away, because you didnt keep up with theory.