Thank you for your commentary.
"Nimzo-Winawer: Black has 4...Ne7 5.Bd2 Nf5!? "
Hmm, this does put a monkey wrench into things. How about 6.Bd3?
6...Nxd4
7.Qg4 c5
8.Qxg7 Rf8
9.a3 and black loses the exchange after
9...Bxc3
10.xc3 Nf5
11.Bxf5 xf5
12.Ba6 or a similar variant.
6...c5
7.Qg4 xd4
8.Bxf5 xf5
9.Qxd4
and
6...c5
7.Qg4 xd4
8.Bxf5 xc3
9.xc3 xf5
10.Qxg7 Rf8
11.xb4 both seem strong to me.
"or 4...c5 5.Bd2 Ne7 (Nc6!? is playable too) 6.Nb5 Bxd2+ 7.Qxd2 o-o 8.dxc5 (8.c3 Nf5 Stoltz-Nimzowitsj, match 1934) Nbc6 9.Nf3 b6 unclear, Spassky-Bronstein,1957. "
It seems the best reaction to the Stoltz-Nimzowich would be
9.Bd3 a6
10.Bxf5 xb6
11.Bc2
though White can of course go beserk, grab pawns and get mated
While I can't force a knight to d6
I still think white has a pull in these lines without much to worry about.
"M(a)cCutcheon: 10...Nc6 lead to draws in three games "
11.0-0-0 e5
12.xe5 Bxg4
13.xf6 Bxd1
certainly looks interesting while aiming for 0-0-0 also leads to a double edged game. Black can also aim for the endgame line with his king on Kd7 which I haven't looked at these lines too deeply.
"and 10...Rxg7 11.Rh8+ Ke7 Barczay-Hoang, Budapest 2001, is a more ambitious try. "
This does look messy. Maybe Qh3 followed by castle?
I guess you did sort of ruined my dreams of riskless advantage in the MacCutcheon but I guess fresh, sharp positions are also welcome. Can someone help me assign advantage or equality to the MacCutcheon lines?
P.S. Word to the wise. Always copy long posts before posting. I neglected to fill the name box and would have been very sad if not for ctrl c.