Quote:



The Two Knights Chapter is 22 pages long.  There are 4 games w/ 4.Ng5 

The move that Davies particularly hangs his hat on is 10...Bc5 (rather then Bd6) in what he calls the main line.   From the game E. Alekseev v. V. Yemelin, St. Petersburg Championship, 2000: 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Be2 h6 9.Nf3 e4 10.Ne5 Bc5! 11. c3  Davies then quotes Emms analysis (on Emms' page 215) that 11.00 might be better then 11.c3.  But Davies suggests in this line that 11...00 might be better then the 11...Qd6 or 11...Qd4  that Emms gives.  Davies gives the line 11...00! 12. c3 Qc7 13.d4 exd3 14.Nxd3 and says this leads to similar positions to another game in another note where he liked black's position.   

In the 9.Nh3 (instead of 9.Nf3) line he likes 9...g5 calling it Black's "best" over 9...Bd6 or 9...Bc5 (the two moves that Emms covered). The game he covers for this variation is Grischuk v. Malaniuk, Russian Team Championships, 2001.

Yep 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Bb5 Bc5 is very viable for black. I am less sure about Bc5 in the scottish 4 knights (after 4 d4 exd4 5 Nxd4). So in that case I'd go for 4 .. Bb4 (also avoiding the Belgrade). I think one exception is acceptable to the Bc5 rule.

Pity this book doesnt cover most of the lines I wanted.

Thanks for the info, Prince-Nez!

I also would have liked Willempie's idea of a Bc5-based repertoire. Davies even did a Foxy Chess Openings video on the Möller years ago (does anyone know if that is still worth getting, or too obsolete?).

On the plus side, it's encouraging that he is recommending a defense to the Ruy that he himself has used successfully (as Roger pointed out). And even if I decide I don't like the 11..Nd7 variation, the book still should be useful for earlier deviations like the Exchange Variation, as well as all the recommendations in the non-Ruy openings.

Where can you buy the book from? According to Amazon the book is not out yet. Is it on sale at Borders in the US?

Does Davies deal with the lines recommended by Khalifman?

Quote:

But why make such a big exception for the Ruy? (101 out of 192 pages ) For its simplicity, I much more like Willempie's idea of a Bc5 repertoire:

Quote:

This makes a lot of sense to me and works out well in most defences, at least ar my modest level

Quote:



KG: "Against the King's Gambit I am a firm believer in 2...Bc5 as a simple and strong defence." 

Four Knights: "I recommend that black play a simpler line [compared to the "aggressive" Rubinstein variation against the Spanish Four Knights], but one which retains more play in the position.  Capablanca's 4...Bb4 5.00 00 6.d3 d6 7.Bg5 Bxc3 8.bxc3 Qe7 9.Re1 Nd8 10.d4 Bg4 leads to an interesting fighting game in which Black gets a share of the chances." 

4.g3 is also considered in the Four Knights in one game.  "4...d6 is a quite a nice idea because it forces White to lose time with 5.h3 if he wants to avoid 5.d4 Bg4." The game in question is Hector-Giorgadze, Spanish Team Championship, 2003 (0-1 in 72 moves).

Vienna: 3 games that start 1.e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3.f4 d5 4.fxe5 Nxe4 5.Nf3 Be7 (Hellers-Karpov, Haninge 1990) and 1.e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. g3 c6! ("might well put 3.g3 out of business") and 1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d3 Na5 (This game is also meant to cover Black's response to the Bishop's Opening.)

One game on the Ponziani and one on the Center Game (black fianchettos his king's bishop) .   Analysis of the Danish Gambit is incorporated with the analysis of the Scotch Gambit (also one game).    The Scotch Four Knights and Belgrade Gambit are also covered in one game. 

Obviously, there was a lot to cover in limited space.   

The book is in the usual Everyman complete game style with summaries provided at the end of each chapter instead of an index of variations at the back of the book. 

Obviously, the Ruy Lopez gets the lion's share of the coverage (101 of the book's 192 pages).

In the introduction, GM Davies writes that his goal was to make playing 1...e5 a "practical proposition" for club players.   And that he adopted a "keep it simple" solution to most of white's options (except for the Ruy Lopez).

I hope this helped a bit.

He does indeed recommend the Keres variation (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 00 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 00 9.h3 Na5 10.Bc2 c5 11. d4 Nd7) as his mainline defense to the Lopez.

He also recommends 5...Qf6 in the exchange Lopez and the Two Knights if White wants to play the Italian. 

Also, 4...Bc5 against the Scotch.