Quote:


How about you play the Zilbermints Gambit in the Euwe Defense with White?

1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Nxf3 e6  6 Bg5 Be7 7 Bd3 Nc6 8 00 Nxd4 9 Kh1

Hello Pablo. Yes, I have a novelty in Sadler variation prepared. Qf3 seems to give no advantage. And I also prefer to not play the game because the challenge is aimed for those who are "deeply opposed" to the BDG, like TopNotch and others. We should "stay together". There is also an important factor of time. Two games will be enough for me, maybe three, but two (MNb and Bonsai) are quite enough for the time being. Of course I would be glad if you comment on both games, finding some interesting possibilities for white. 

Yes. I accept you challange. Let´s play Gunderam. But I wonder, you are a BDG defender, this challange is rather for BDG "attacker"... all games can be commented during progress, maybe you can be rather an advisor for white than to play against you favourite opening? That´s something for considering. But anyway, I´m prepared to accept your challange in Gunderam. In case you want to play, please make new forum thread like in case of the first match Schoupal : MNb. Thanks.

Bonsai: Yes, I´m looking forward to our match, esp. Lemberger Countergambit game would be of great interest for me. Of course, I like also the Gunderam Defence.

Hello, I'd like to accept the challenge, too, as I really have my doubts about the BDG based on "principle". I'll not be online for a few days, but I'll send my first move next Wednesday or Thursday... I think I'm most tempted to either choose the Tartakower-Gunderam (or maybe the Lemberger...), but I'll use my off-line time to consider the matter.
Bonsai
PS: I believe there's also a BDG thematic at iecg about to start (but I personally don't think I have the time for that even though it would be interesting - hence a single game against a BDG-fan seems just perfect).
PPS: Oh, and yes, I have no objections to playing on the forum.

Hello. 
   My name is Patrik Schoupal. I´m an OTB player (FIDE 1977) and I also play correspondence chess (my recent and first IECG ELO is 2229). I´m fan of gambits, especially Morra gambit, Fajarowitz g. and some other ones e.g. BDG. I see a lot of different players to ridicule BDG and I want to give them opportunity to prove their words in a game, not just by their "flat statements" and "chat like" evidence. 
   Therefore I offer a game in this particular variations (where I think I can prove +/- advantage):

1) Lemberger counter-gambit 1.e4 d5 2.d4 dxe4 3.Nc3 e5

2) Ziegler def. 1.e4 d5 2.d4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 c6

3) Tartakower-Gunderam 1.e4 d5 2.d4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5

4) Bogoljubow attack 1.e4 d5 2.d4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 g6

   Well, if there is a challanger brave enough to accept the challange and not only to criticise, he/she is welcome.

   Conditions for the game can be discussed. I prefer playing here via forum and to allow all comments during the game.

PS (aka Sevenviolets)