(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › 1. d4 d5 2. c4 › Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit"
(Moderators: Jupp53, proustiskeen)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit" (Read 28254 times)
tracke
Senior Member
****
Offline


Introite tam etiam ibi
dei sunt

Posts: 467
Location: Kiel (GER)
Joined: 09/21/04
Gender: Male
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #42 - 07/09/06 at 17:37:17
Post Tools
I´m not sure about the quality of the coverage of qga with 3e4.
What about 3 e4 Nf6 4 e5 Nd5 5 Bc4 Nb6 6 Bb3 Bf5 ??

This is a common and quite often played transposition. 
After 7...e6 & 8...Nc6 the game will most likely return to the 
6Bb3 main line (6...Nc6 7 Ne2/Be3 Bf5 8 Nc3 e6 ...).
You´ll find nothing about this in Ward´s opening book, 
a book player following him is simply move-ordered!

Btw, with black I do not fear the "attack" 6...Nc6 7 Nf3 Bg4
8 Bxf7!? but I don´t want to give white an easy draw (8 Ng5).

tracke  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #41 - 07/07/06 at 17:12:36
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 07/07/06 at 16:32:34:
My impression of 6. Bg5 (I tried it briefly long ago, on the recommendation of the Keene book) is that it probably doesn't lead to a theoretical advantage (i.e. it is perhaps closer to = than to +=), but leads to positions where I would still probably rather be White, and is well-suited to minimising Black's winning chances.  It does follow the principle of exchanging pieces when playing against an isolated pawn (since the usual continuation is something like 6...Be7 7. Bxe7 Ngxe7 8. e3 0-0 9. dc Qa5).  For what it's worth, in the NIC database (out of almost 200 games), it scores 56.5% (a little better than White scores overall), with about 43% draws.

I have to agree with this assessment. I toyed with the Tarrasch after having a book, but got constantly creamed in rapid games in exactly this line.
  
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #40 - 07/07/06 at 16:32:34
Post Tools
My impression of 6. Bg5 (I tried it briefly long ago, on the recommendation of the Keene book) is that it probably doesn't lead to a theoretical advantage (i.e. it is perhaps closer to = than to +=), but leads to positions where I would still probably rather be White, and is well-suited to minimising Black's winning chances.  It does follow the principle of exchanging pieces when playing against an isolated pawn (since the usual continuation is something like 6...Be7 7. Bxe7 Ngxe7 8. e3 0-0 9. dc Qa5).  For what it's worth, in the NIC database (out of almost 200 games), it scores 56.5% (a little better than White scores overall), with about 43% draws.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #39 - 07/07/06 at 12:03:39
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 07/06/06 at 23:11:54:
Markovich wrote on 07/06/06 at 14:45:07:
alumbrado wrote on 07/03/06 at 10:33:53:
Ward gives the main line against the Tarrasch, as everybody seems to.

The last time I saw a repertoire book which suggested anything different was Ray Keene's Opening Repertoire for White way back in the 80s which recommended (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5) 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bg5.


Yes, and that is not such a bad line against the Tarrasch, in my view.

 
I agree completely, Markovich.  It's the main line and hasn't been refuted or even seriously tested for quite a while, so it deserves to be recommended without controversy.


I was talking about 6. Bg5, which isn't tbe main line, perhaps doesn't deserve to be recommended without controversy, but which nevertheless, in my view, is somewhat promising for White.  You perhaps thought I was talking about about 9. Bg5 in the universally popular the Rubinstein Variation.
  
The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #38 - 07/06/06 at 23:11:54
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 07/06/06 at 14:45:07:
alumbrado wrote on 07/03/06 at 10:33:53:
Ward gives the main line against the Tarrasch, as everybody seems to.

The last time I saw a repertoire book which suggested anything different was Ray Keene's Opening Repertoire for White way back in the 80s which recommended (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5) 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bg5.


Yes, and that is not such a bad line against the Tarrasch, in my view.

 
I agree completely, Markovich.  It's the main line and hasn't been refuted or even seriously tested for quite a while, so it deserves to be recommended without controversy.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #37 - 07/06/06 at 14:45:07
Post Tools
alumbrado wrote on 07/03/06 at 10:33:53:
Ward gives the main line against the Tarrasch, as everybody seems to.

The last time I saw a repertoire book which suggested anything different was Ray Keene's Opening Repertoire for White way back in the 80s which recommended (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5) 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bg5.


Yes, and that is not such a bad line against the Tarrasch, in my view.
  
The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alumbrado
God Member
*****
Offline


Esse quam videri bonus
malebo

Posts: 1418
Location: London
Joined: 02/17/03
Gender: Male
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #36 - 07/03/06 at 10:33:53
Post Tools
Ward gives the main line against the Tarrasch, as everybody seems to.

The last time I saw a repertoire book which suggested anything different was Ray Keene's Opening Repertoire for White way back in the 80s which recommended (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5) 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bg5.
  
If sometimes we fly too close to the sun, at least this shows we are spreading our wings.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
skellington_jaquie
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


the penultimate blunder
wins

Posts: 5
Joined: 06/25/06
Gender: Female
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #35 - 07/03/06 at 05:51:05
Post Tools
i cant recall the lines he recommended, but his basic take on the tarrasch was that black had a choice between accepting a solid but inferior position, or gambitting a pawn (which he considered dangerous).  he did stress that white needed to be prepared because the tarrasch could (of course) be dangerous.


-jaq
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Trolletje
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 19
Joined: 01/14/05
Gender: Male
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #34 - 07/02/06 at 07:43:50
Post Tools
You can see some sample pages, as well the index of variations at: http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1857444116/ref=sib_dp_pt/002-1629597-7590464#rea...
I don't have the book, so I can't tell you more..
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BladezII
Senior Member
****
Offline


Member of chesspublishing
.com and STC Club

Posts: 409
Joined: 11/01/04
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #33 - 07/01/06 at 22:47:25
Post Tools
What does he recommend vs the Tarrasch Defense?  What does he say is his bottom line for White in this line?  Promising or not?

  
I am a participating member of chesspublishing.com since 1998.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
skellington_jaquie
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


the penultimate blunder
wins

Posts: 5
Joined: 06/25/06
Gender: Female
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #32 - 06/27/06 at 17:49:47
Post Tools
i'd also agree that hansens review is on the mark.  the coverage was way thin.  i bought it and promptly gave the book away.  BUT this wasnt entirely because of the quality of the book....it wasnt wards best but there were interesting things there....the problem for me was that i almost always enter the queens gambit from a 1.Nf3 move order.  Palliser's book conforms to that very nicely (love that book), where Ward's repetoire does not.  just a lil something to keep in mind when you are considering whether or not to buy it.  the most interesting part might be Ward's continued championing of 3.e4 in the qga.  if you play that line, i think that material alone could justify your purchase.

in fact, i bet a ward book solely on the 3.e4 qga lines would be a gem!  (i propose the title _attacking the qga_); id buy it and i only face the lines as black.   Smiley
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #31 - 06/16/06 at 17:09:57
Post Tools
I've always played 3.e4 against the QGA, and I think this is one of the better parts of Ward's book.  Also, I've always played the sneaky 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 against the Slav, and I think it's just as good as anything else.  Unfortunately, I think Ward could have given us more coverage in these lines, especially against 4...a6 and even 4...Bf5?!, which is supposed to be bad for Black but played very often at club level.

After 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 a6 5.Nf3, he makes no mention of 5...Bf5 (only looking at 5...b5).  Maybe 5...Bf5 is dubious, but a quick database search didn't reveal a consensus as to how White should best continue.

His coverage of 4...g6 is a little thin as well, and he kind of glosses over 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 dc 4.e4 e5, not even mentioning 5.Nf3 ed, which is too bad, because I was hoping to get his opinion on the piece sac 6.Bxc4 dc 7.Bxf7+.  I assume Ward wants White to play 6.Qxd4 (or maybe 6.Nxd4)??  Who knows though, because he doesn't mention this move order as far as I can see.

Overall I guess I agree with Carsten Hansen's review (http://www.chesscafe.com/hansen/hansen.htm); in fact, I think it's exactly on the money.  Which is too bad, because I've liked some of Ward's books and had really hoped for more from this one given the higher quality of the other books in this Play the... series.  However, if you, like me, play these lines as White anyway, you'll probably want the book.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Darthmambo
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 105
Location: USA
Joined: 01/18/03
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #30 - 06/16/06 at 04:07:12
Post Tools
How does everyone feel about his choice against the queens gambit, e4? and the slav?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tracke
Senior Member
****
Offline


Introite tam etiam ibi
dei sunt

Posts: 467
Location: Kiel (GER)
Joined: 09/21/04
Gender: Male
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #29 - 05/28/06 at 16:25:21
Post Tools
Ward recommends 3 de d4 4 a3 Nc6 5.e3 against the Albin. 
But not 3 e3 e5 4 de d4 5 a3 against the Chigorin.
So the Chigorin is weaker than the Albin ?!

tracke  Huh
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IMRichardPalliser
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 305
Location: York
Joined: 03/23/04
Re: Any info on Everyman's "Play the Queens Gambit
Reply #28 - 05/27/06 at 10:44:50
Post Tools
See also http://www.bcmchess.co.uk/reviews/bcmrev0606.html
  
http://www.everymanchess.com
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge