I have annotated the game Gyimesi-- Radjabov, Aeroflot Open, 2005.  Let me tell you why I did this.

I wrote the following email to GM Mikhalevsky:

"Victor,

I am grateful that a real expert in the KID, from either side, is working in this site.  I want to thank you since I can appreciate the tremendous amount of work this has to be.  Having someone who leans towards the White side of the KID has its advantages: is very good for us who lean to the Black side of the KID to see what significant improvements for White there may be so we can prepare for them.

Now, that takes me to the game you included when annotating/commenting on Bayonet --"Gyimesi, Z -- Radjabov, T  Aeroflot Open2005".

In that game you inserted a game between Duncan, C --Snape, I/ West Bromwich 2004. You suggested in that game that White play 16.Nd5 which allows him a slight but I think a solid advantage.  Yet, on move 15....  Black could have improved significantly with 15... c6 !

I include the game as a file.  I  promoted Snap's game to be the main line in that game/file.  Given that I am an advocate/fan of the KID, nothing short of equalizing satisfies me most of the time."

If for some reason, since I know he is very busy, so, if for  some reason that game does  not make it to the next update, I have included everything I wrote in chesspub.exe

I annotated the game and wrote my explanations there.  All subscribers to the KID section of chesspublishing are going to be able to see it.  I  hope all fans of the Black side of KID see it, and I hope that those who play the Bayonet attack as WHite can see it too.

Cheers,

BladezII