With 1.e4 I am currently recomending the Vienna Game which starts 2.Nc3 after e5. At the lower levels for whatever reason it is not as popular anymore. I see a lot of Italians and Lopezs but I have yet to see a Vienna in tournement practice. Often Times i get an improved kings gambit which is somthing which I am partial too because of my aggresive intention with both the black and white pieces.

I love to play for a win with the black pieces and as such I play a sicilian and somtiems e5 and then french.

The Sicilian is always the way to go if you really want to play for the full point with black. I use 4 different lines in the open. The Classical,The Najdorf,The Dragon and the Scheveningen. How is it possible that I play all of these with a degree of success? Well many of the most popular sicilians share many common ideas like queen side expansion and getting d5 in as a way to activate all of black forces and make the game = or =/+. 

The french has a drawish and boring reputation in a lot of amateur circles. This is unfortunate because it is quite a fighting defense. The main lines of the classical can be rather sharp. Black can unbalance things rather quickly. I play a burn variation with gxf6 which im sure you can find some into on in the french section of the forum. The advanced variation is not especially troublesome as you can play almost entirely on ideas. The modern where white pushes his pawn to e5 after black plays Nf6 is very popular but black has a lot of options to create quick counterplay. 

You can avoid a lot of classical theory by taking on the jsut as equally theortical Winawer. Which is not to my taste. It can be very good counterattacking and aggresive system but the classical with the burn and other lines are somthing that just draws me to it. 

The fighting defences I use when I play e5 are 3...f5 after both 3.Bb5 and Bc4. I also had a latvian phaze which is 2...f5 after Nf3 but this is not for the people who dont want to study. The 3.f5 defences are not to common on the tournemeny scene at least here in michigan which is why i like to employ them from time to time. I have somthing like an 90% score with them off and online combined. Often times against higher rated opposition. And you can play these on mainly ideas. Go over a few lines and games and youll be set depending how quickly you absorb new ideas. 

There is also a philidor which many are affraid to play any more after the famous opera box game. It begins. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Bg4?! 4.de and instead of taking like in the opera box game Nd7 or c6 and you can gambit the pawn as after exd6 Bxd6 and you have a slight but useful lead in development with good attacking chances. Tim McGrew wrote about this and a companion article for it in his gambit cartel which can be downloaded at chesscafe.com

the two articles are 
Not Exactly Opera Box and Going Fishing

Both are very fun to go over and he really is a great writer. I recomend you read all of his collums as not only will they show you a lot of interesting ideas but also entertain you. 

My main repertoire as of late is:

White:
vs 2.e5 the vienna (I played the lopez for years but decided i wanted somthing a bit faster.

vs the Sicilian: The open and Smith Morra gambit. I like attacking and playing the open and smith morra are ways of getting to an attacking positon. And as a sicilian player I know its a lot easier to prepare as white because black must learn all of whites replys while white only needs to learn 1 for each system!

vs the french: I do employ the classical myself with the white pieces aiming fot an Alekhine-Chatard attack which gives white a lot of great attacking positions. Vs the winawer I play an early Qg4 as I was inspired by stein.

vs the caro-kann: The adanced with Nc3

vs the pirc: The Chinese attack 

With black I employ the Sicilian and Kings Indian defences. which i will post in more deatail later.

Have you already checked this page?

http://www.chesspublishing.com/content/repert.htm