History has shown that World Championship matches are always tense nervy affairs, and the use of chess engines while kibitzing this match gives a warped sense of the play. Try kibitzing without an engine running in the background and you get a better feel for what's going on between these two players.
To my mind both players are getting unfairly vilified for missing wins and strong continuations invariably found and verified by chess programs. Listening to commentary of game three on ICC, Kramnik was criticised for capturing with cxd5 instead of exd5 which by all accounts gave a big advantage, however the complications after e4 in response to exd5 were difficult to assess when low on time and with a two game cushion why would one take the risk.
I don't think that game three was indicative of poor form on Kramnik's part, but rather a calm and practical decision under the circumstances.
When in doubt, bail out.....seems to be Kramnik's mantra and had Topalov done the same in game 1 he wouldn't be forced to go for broke now in every game.
Those that think Topalov has any realistic chances of bouncing back now are dreaming. Much more likely is that Topalov will gain some much needed match experience from this encounter and employ the lessons learned in a return match sometime in the future.
To Topa's credit, this is a much more interesting and thrilling match than Kramnik-Leko ever was. Win lose or draw, Topa is an exciting player to watch, reminiscent of when Kasparov dominated the boards not so long ago, lets hope that the rest of the match continues to be as entertaining.
Toppy