Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Chessbase v Chess Assistant (Read 36096 times)
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #12 - 06/28/06 at 17:23:29
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 06/28/06 at 16:28:39:
It is not exactly a chess data base, but has anyone tried Bookup?  I've been using this excellent software for years.  It's a great way to store openings variations.  This is a great example of software doing one thing well.  The interface has about four whole buttons.  http://www.bookup.com.


I've heard Bookup is very good as an opening repertoire resource, in part because it handles transpositions really well (something to the effect it stores positions rather than move lists).  Although I've been tempted to get it, I eventually opted for Chessbase when I finally decided to pay money for Chess software.

Markovich,

Would you recommend Bookup to someone who is already using Chessbase or Chess Assistant?  For example, does Bookup enable you to do things (or do them much faster/easier) than the other programs do?

Thanks,
Ostap
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #11 - 06/28/06 at 16:28:39
Post Tools
GMTonyKosten wrote on 06/28/06 at 10:54:51:
Nobody seems to have mentioned the obvious plus for ChessBase: you need this to use the ChessPublishing playable eBooks! Yes, this is the Chesspublishing.com Forum, after all! Roll Eyes
Otherwise, ChessBase has added lots of 'functionality' (the 'bloatware' previously referred to) to attract weaker players (I suppose) that have no use whatsoever for a serious player. At least, not for someone like me who plays lots of professional chess. ChessBase 9 is also the most badly written software I have ever seen, and is continually crashing! Angry
I have never bothered to use the database facilities provided with the engines such as Hiarcs, but aren't these sufficient for most people?


Frequent crashing?!!  Man, am I glad I switched to Chess Assistant!  That is a >>terrible<< condemnation of any program, and I rather suspect it stems from trying to cram too many 'features' in.

I realize that ChessPub has limited resources, but I wonder if playable e-books might be issued in an alterantive format as well.  Personally though, I do keep a copy of CB on hand, just for this sort of thing.

It is not exactly a chess data base, but has anyone tried Bookup?  I've been using this excellent software for years.  It's a great way to store openings variations.  This is a great example of software doing one thing well.  The interface has about four whole buttons.  http://www.bookup.com. ; If that source can be believed (I believe that it can), Peter Svidler said this about Bookup:

"Bookup is simply the best way to study chess and it is incredibly useful in chess openings preparation.  Bookup is one of the most user-friendly programs I've seen, written by the most user-friendly programmers I've ever met.  It's great stuff!"

But bah, who is this Svidler!?  >>I<< say that!
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #10 - 06/28/06 at 14:01:20
Post Tools
GMTonyKosten wrote on 06/28/06 at 10:54:51:
ChessBase 9 is also the most badly written software I have ever seen, and is continually crashing! Angry


I purchased Chessbase 9 earlier this year (had been using the free Chessbase lite but was starting to find that too limited) and have had problems with frequent crashing - thought it might have something to do with my computer (conflicting application or something).  So the frequent crashes are characteristic of the software...
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3191
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #9 - 06/28/06 at 10:54:51
Post Tools
Nobody seems to have mentioned the obvious plus for ChessBase: you need this to use the ChessPublishing playable eBooks! Yes, this is the Chesspublishing.com Forum, after all! Roll Eyes
Otherwise, ChessBase has added lots of 'functionality' (the 'bloatware' previously referred to) to attract weaker players (I suppose) that have no use whatsoever for a serious player. At least, not for someone like me who plays lots of professional chess. ChessBase 9 is also the most badly written software I have ever seen, and is continually crashing! Angry
I have never bothered to use the database facilities provided with the engines such as Hiarcs, but aren't these sufficient for most people?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 462
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #8 - 06/28/06 at 03:55:44
Post Tools
Quote:
Greetings,

katar
(1) Unfortunately, the Crafty link doesn't seem to work - I've tried other links to download Crafty (found through Google), but they don't seem to work either.  Sad

(2) Is Shredder/Hiarcs/Fritz compatible with Scid?
(3) How does one prevent the downloading of the same game many times?

(4) Is there a way to link analyses from several annotators to a single game? Or is each annotated game seen as a "different" game?

1. The Crafty link works for me.  Maybe try again(?)
2. Any WinBoard engine is compatible with SCID.  There are hundreds, though Ruffian (earlier versions are free) and Crafty (always free) lead the pack.  UCI engines are supposedly compatible with SCID with some complicated business called Polyglot or something.  I don't think proprietary engines work in SCID.  (But i'm not sure.)
3. In SCID, one can "delete duplicate games" in the "Maintenance Window" for easy pruning.
4. In SCID, I'm not sure how to link different annotations.  SCID has a Merge feature which inserts a game as a variation within a stem game, but i've never tried to merge comments.

Finally, I'd suggest again that you can try out these progs for yourself: CA-lite, SCID (full), and CB-lite are available for free download.  There is a lot to be said for a program's GUI & ease of use, notwithstanding features.  After all, you will be staring at the GUI a lot and eyestrain is no fun.  Although, if you want chess pieces designed like toy soldiers, CHESSMASTER! is the ticket.  Smiley
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dragan Glas
Senior Member
****
Offline


"If I, like Solomon, ...
could have my wish -
"

Posts: 424
Location: Ireland
Joined: 06/25/06
Gender: Male
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #7 - 06/27/06 at 21:33:18
Post Tools
Greetings,

Markovich
I missed your post - I was still typing mine!  Embarrassed

I certainly agree with you there about the "bloatware" and the 3D graphics!

The tendency of developers to add this or that "cool" feature for its own sake is something to which the more technically-minded are prone - what they need is someone to go through the features with them and ask "What good is that for??".  Roll Eyes

At the end of the day, you want chess software which has the power to do the job it's supposed to do - whether that's database manipulation and/or playing chess.

About the only need for 3D representation would be a literal "tree" of games/opening variations - where the "thickness" of the trunk/branches represents the number of games in which that opening/variation has been played.

Quite possibly where the quantity of games is logarithmically represented, so that the thickness increases more slowly as the quantity of games in that opening/variation increases.

Just a thought!

Kindest regards,

James
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dragan Glas
Senior Member
****
Offline


"If I, like Solomon, ...
could have my wish -
"

Posts: 424
Location: Ireland
Joined: 06/25/06
Gender: Male
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #6 - 06/27/06 at 21:12:50
Post Tools
Greetings,

Thank you all for your responses!

TopNotch
Yes - I've been aware of that over the years.

Though, as Watson points out, Chess Assistant uses sources for games in the former Soviet states and Eastern Europe - possibly reflecting it's greater popularity there? And, perhaps, it's greater usefulness(!!?) - afterall, they have a tendency to play better chess than elsewhere in the world!

katar
That's most interesting!

Unfortunately, the Crafty link doesn't seem to work - I've tried other links to download Crafty (found through Google), but they don't seem to work either.  Sad

I'll grant you, I may not be an IM but I used to be alright - I had won some "local" tournaments back in Ireland...years ago, I must admit.

My main problem has been the long breaks in my chess-playing life: Roll Eyes

I played in the late-70s in Ireland (both at school and in tournaments) - but then had a 12-year break due to failing eyesight during my 20s. After operations on both eyes, I started playing again in the early 90s - including after coming over to the UK in 1992, where I played for the Bourne End club and also for Bucks (UK-based forum members will understand!).

Again, however, I dropped out due to work commitments - I work for a computer company. I'm looking to get back into the game again as my role has become less mentally-demanding (more managerial rather than programming/technically-oriented).

Apologies if I've put you all to sleep!  Wink

Keano/Ptero
Quite possibly.

Someone I knew was involved with marketing ChessBase but then switched to Chess Assistant when it seemed to lose its way, to her mind, functionality-wise.

As you also say, Ptero, ChessBase may well be the more solid choice, if only because it's the de facto standard.

*****************************

A few more questions for you all...

Is Shredder/Hiarcs/Fritz compatible with Scid?

As regards downloading games...

Would it be possible to use a form of "Torrent" to do so?

I'm particularly thinking of the fact that ChessBase and Chess Assistant seem to use different sources for games - could one download from them all to whatever database software one is using or are they only accessible through their respective "paid-for" software?

How does one prevent the downloading of the same game many times?

Is there a way to link analyses from several annotators to a single game? Or is each annotated game seen as a "different" game?

As I think of more, I'll add them!  Smiley

Again, thank you for your responses so far!

Kindest regards,

James
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #5 - 06/27/06 at 19:43:32
Post Tools
Quote:
Greetings,

I've been looking at getting back into chess after a number of years out of the game.

Given that openings books are virtually out-of-date by the time they're going to press, I've been looking at getting one of the above.

Can one download games/variations related to a specific opening, for instance?
Are the download sources exclusive to either or can one download from sources normally accessed by the other application?

Watson did a short review: http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/jwatsonbkrev54.html

I was wondering what everyone thought of these?

Kindest regards,

James



I've used CB, CA and SCID at various times, but right now, I rely on Chess Assistant.  It costs less.  In general also, I think that Chess Assistant completes searches faster.   

Frankly however, I find all these programs very annoying.  CA and CB are notable examples of bloatware. (Let's see, what more weird functionality can we stick on a button?).  Neither has a well-written manual.  Also, I am not at all amused by the smartass advice/coaching personalities (or is it indeed the same personality?) that CB and CA have built into them.  Who needs a freaking machine for a chess coach, anyway, but one thing I don't want from a $250 piece of software is the smarter-than-you attitude of some puerile West German computer geek.  I would sooner have Microsoft Office's d--ned animated paper clip.  And who needs 3d chess pieces, for crying out loud?  I know, you can turn all those things off, but you're still paying for them.

SCID is easily the best designed and it's free, but it does not really stick to doing one thing well, and I found its multi-window interface almost intolerable.   

Somebody should read Michael Gancarz' Linux and Unix Philosophy, and/or Eric Raymond's The Art of Unix Programming, then go write a package of good chess data base utilities with a command line interface.  For Unix.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ptero
Full Member
***
Offline


When all else fails, read
the instructions.

Posts: 220
Joined: 03/22/06
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #4 - 06/27/06 at 17:54:05
Post Tools
Keano wrote on 06/27/06 at 07:41:47:
Personally I think ChessBase is and always has been behind Chess Assistant in terms of pure functionality, but on the other hand the user interface is far more attractive and this will be the bottom line for many people.


I'll second that. Once you get the going with Chess Assistant, working with ChessBase will look to you a bit lame. However you'll need some time and patience to learn to work with assistant, so Chessbase may be a more solid choice. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2928
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #3 - 06/27/06 at 07:41:47
Post Tools
Personally I think ChessBase is and always has been behind Chess Assistant in terms of pure functionality, but on the other hand the user interface is far more attractive and this will be the bottom line for many people.











  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 462
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #2 - 06/27/06 at 02:45:46
Post Tools
For the impoverished or budget-minded there is also SCID

http://scid.sourceforge.net/

and Crafty engine (which ships with Fritz, so the Chessbase people must at least respect it to distribute it as a Fritz alternative)
http://cito.atspace.com/index.html

And (at least a few years ago) a Master recommended this combo over the "industry standard" programs
http://www.tomrowan.com/chess/articles/free_chess_software.html

**********
Lastly, you should download the free versions of Chess Assistant and Chessbase Light.  CB light is HIDEOUS-- a company with an ugly demo is very confident (egotistical?) indeed-- but CBL gives an idea how CB manipulates a database.

Personally I use SCID and it's fine for me.  In fact if I got CB or CA for free I would not switch.

PS, I am rated low, only 1700.  Depending on your level you may want to plump for a slicker proggy with bells and whistles.  BUt if you are an IM-candidate i do not think you would be asking this question.   Wink
**********

As for games/database, PGN (not CB or CA) is the "industry standard".  PGN is universal.
I wrote something about how to compile a big database very quickly:
http://s95395959.onlinehome.us/public/chess/database/
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 2211
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: Chessbase v Chess Assistant
Reply #1 - 06/27/06 at 00:36:58
Post Tools
Chessbase is the industry standard.

Nuff said

Toppers Smiley
  

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dragan Glas
Senior Member
****
Offline


"If I, like Solomon, ...
could have my wish -
"

Posts: 424
Location: Ireland
Joined: 06/25/06
Gender: Male
Chessbase v Chess Assistant
06/26/06 at 20:43:55
Post Tools
Greetings,

I've been looking at getting back into chess after a number of years out of the game.

Given that openings books are virtually out-of-date by the time they're going to press, I've been looking at getting one of the above.

Can one download games/variations related to a specific opening, for instance?
Are the download sources exclusive to either or can one download from sources normally accessed by the other application?

Watson did a short review: http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/jwatsonbkrev54.html

I was wondering what everyone thought of these?

Kindest regards,

James
« Last Edit: 06/26/06 at 22:03:02 by Dragan Glas »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo