Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 22
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5 (Read 190406 times)
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #72 - 07/16/06 at 05:25:45
Post Tools
After careful consideration, I've decided to go with 17.c4.  As noted above, opening up the white king position like this entails a certain amount of risk.  However, there seem to be some dynamic plusses to this move which I think (hope) outweigh its potential minuses.

So we have:
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.f3 Bg7 7.Be3 0-0 8.Qd2 Nc6 9.0-0-0 d5 10.exd5 Nxd5 11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Bd4 Bxd4 13.Qxd4 Qb6 14.Na4 Qa5 15. b3 Qc7 16.h4 h5 17.c4
http://www.france-echecs.com/diagramme/imgboard.phpfen=r1b2rk1/p1q1pp2/2p3p1/3n3...
It looks like there are six moves to consider here: 17...e5, 17...Qf4+, and four knight moves.  Of these, I considered 17...Nf4 to be the main line but I think each of the knight moves and 17...e5 merit serious consideration.  I do not think 17...Qf4+ is a serious contender (although there is nothing horrible about it, I think offering the queen exchange seems like a bad strategic decision at this point).
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #71 - 07/16/06 at 01:48:31
Post Tools
Scholar wrote on 07/15/06 at 07:17:07:
So what has changed in the past few days?  Well, I now think that White has some interesting choices at move 17 besides g4.

17.c4 which I think was dangerous last turn, now looks a little out of place, since it exposes White's king but doesn't really add anything to White attack.  For this reason I haven't looked at it so carefully, other than to note that Black can plan on re-routing his knight via f4 and e6 (with tempo) to a suitable home on d4 (supported by a pawn on c5).

I have the same concerns about exposing the white king, but White’s initiative in the 17.c4 lines seems stronger.  I think White risks more but stands to gain more.  A sample line  (albeit not deep at all) is 17...Nf4 [17...e5 18.Qc5 Nf4 19.Rd6 +/=] 18.Qe3 [18.Rg1 is another option] 18...Rb8 19.Rg1 and g4 follows soon (maybe preceded by g3 to push the knight back.  Another idea is 20.g3 Ne6 21.Bh3.  I’ve analyzed a rather dense web of variations, and it’s difficult to draw definitive conclusions, but White seems to have a sustained initiative with decent prospects of converting it to a more concrete advantage.  It's difficult to be more specific at this point when there are so many branches in the analysis - some details will have to wait until we have moved a bit down a particular line should 17.c4 be my selected move (which is starting to look likely!).

Quote:
17.Bc4 is complicated, but I think OK for Black.  I have a hard time keeping track of the variations in this line, but I think that 17...Nb6 holds things together.  If not, Black has many other choices, but this is the move that I believe is the best competitor to 17.g4.

This move was my first impulse when I was looking for an improvement over 17.Rd2.  I think it is an improvement, but as you indicate 17...Nb6 seems to hold things together quite well.

Quote:
And what of 17.g4?  In addition to the line quoted above (which still reigns as my 'verified' main line), Black has some more ambitious choices -- 17...Qg3 18.gxh5 Qxf3 19.hxg6 Qxh1 sees White  reply in kind by sacrificing a rook for some excellent attacking chances, and the uncertainty resulting makes life difficult for both sides.  An endgame where White has two pawns for the exchange seems likely to result.  After 17...hxg4 18.fxg4 Black can also try e5 with unclear complications.

So White has a chance to play for complications now, and Black will have his opportunity to decide whether or not to enter the 'melee' I alluded to in my previous post on the two subsequent moves.  I'd be interested in reading what others think of these ideas -- should Black go for the draw (after 17.g4 hxg4 18.fxg4 Qg3 19.h5 Qe3+ 20.Kb1 Qxd4 I can hardly pretend that Black is trying to win), or play one of the more ambitious lines above, and if so, which is most promising?

Your 17…Qg3 line is very interesting, and something I hadn’t considered.  At first glance, I thought it looked risky but after (18.gxh5 Qxf3 19.hxg6 Qxh1) 20.Bb5 Qf3 21.Bxc6 Be6 22.gxf7+ Qxf7 23.Bxd5 Bxd5 24.Qxd5 Qxd5 25.Rxd5 Rf2 Black might actually be fine.  There are possible alternatives to look at which may lead to improvements, but I think this looks like a solid line.
Ah, 17.g4 may well turn out to be the move I wish I had played.  I think it is much safer than 17.c4 while still being a reasonable try for an advantage.  

Quote:
When I was looking back to check for the mention of Golubev's comments (thanks for that link, Ostap!) I saw those early remarks questioning the point of Qb6-a5-c7.  Few of the above lines feature Nc5 (and then usually not until an endgame has been reached), and a couple see Black's queen target the weakened dark squares on the queenside and the offsides knight.  So I am happy to see that my hopes for this line were not so absurd after all.
 
I absolutely agree.  15…Qc7 is a very interesting alternative to 13…Qc7.  I think it is still premature to conclude that it is better (or worse).  It leads to complex game with some very interesting choices - and White's offside knight (a main point of the idea) seems to fall into the plus column for Black.

Quote:
Of course, White still has the initiative, and it remains to be seen whether Black can prevent him from making something of it...

Actually, I guess this is the reason I am now leaning toward 17.c4.  I will spend a couple of hours seriously attempting to find a fatal flaw with this move.  I will post my next move a bit later tonight.

Once again, really enjoying the game and discussion.  And I think the real fun is just about to begin!

Cheers,
Ostap
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Scholar
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 557
Location: Chicago
Joined: 04/26/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #70 - 07/16/06 at 00:18:39
Post Tools
OstapBender wrote on 07/15/06 at 14:27:16:
Thanks for the excellent breakdown of White's options!  Briefly: 17.g4 still the frontrunner, but (surprisingly) 17.c4 looking like best competitor (didn't think much of this move initially because it exposes the white king (a1-h8 wide open and b3 weakened), but specific variations seem to suggest that White has nice initiative in several lines.  Could be I'm overlooking something obvious w.r.t. black resources in these lines.


You are right that I underestimated 17.c4 -- which is a little surprising since I thought 16.c4 might have been White's best.  After either that or 17.g4, I think a struggle is ahead.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #69 - 07/15/06 at 21:08:08
Post Tools
Ostap, that is one of my favorite speeches ever written!

We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he that sheds his blood with me 
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile, 
This day shall gentle his condition.
And gentlemen in England now abed, 
Shall think themselves accursed that they were not here;
And hold their manhood cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us on Saint Crispin's Day.


That Billy boy sure did know how to rattle a lance.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #68 - 07/15/06 at 18:25:56
Post Tools
Been kind of a slow week in the Dragon section, hasn't it?  Have Dragon players all moved on to other openings?  Roll Eyes

Well, I guess it was just a matter of time...  Wink

Scholar, I know you don't need the extra help (although I might!) but it would be nice to know that someone else had a strong opinion on this very interesting line that you've decided to follow.

I guess we could take the St. Crispen's Day viewpoint:

   If we are mark'd to die, we are enough 
   To do our country loss; and if to live, 
   The fewer men, the greater share of honor. 
   God's will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.
 
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #67 - 07/15/06 at 14:27:16
Post Tools
Scholar,

Thanks for the excellent breakdown of White's options!  Briefly: 17.g4 still the frontrunner, but (surprisingly) 17.c4 looking like best competitor (didn't think much of this move initially because it exposes the white king (a1-h8 wide open and b3 weakened), but specific variations seem to suggest that White has nice initiative in several lines.  Could be I'm overlooking something obvious w.r.t. black resources in these lines.

Gotta go at the moment but will be back in the afternoon when will try to give a little more detail.

Cheers,
Ostap
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Scholar
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 557
Location: Chicago
Joined: 04/26/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #66 - 07/15/06 at 07:17:07
Post Tools
Scholar wrote on 07/12/06 at 05:17:52:

17.g4 is definitely the critical continuation.  The more that I look at it, though, the less that I am convinced that White can achieve any advantage.  In the lines you give above, a couple of (not at all comprehensive) remarks about the position after 17...hxg4 18.fxg4 Qg3 19.h5:

19... e5 20.Rg1 exd4 21.Rxg3 Ne3 22.Re1 Nxg4 23.hxg6 fxg6 24.Nc5 Rf2 25.Be2 Ne5 26.Nd3 Nxd3+ 27.Bxd3 is your main line and does seem += to me.

19... Qe3+ 20.Kb1 (20.Qxe3 Nxe3 21.Re1 Nxf1 22.Rhxf1 Bxg4 23.hxg6 fxg6 24.Rg1 Bf5 25.Rxe7 Rf7 does look equal) 20...Qxd4 and I think Black may be OK, though White may be a bit better.  White's advantage seems...small.

I'll give these lines another run through, since I think some minor modification of them will be the game continuation, but before committing, I'll investigate the deviations at move 16 and 17.


So what has changed in the past few days?  Well, I now think that White has some interesting choices at move 17 besides g4.

17.Bd3 -- does not impress.  Black can play Rfd8 or Nf4 (more solid), and after the latter move there are some tricks, such as 17.Bd3 Nf4 18.Rd2 Rd8 19.Qe3 Bf5 20.Bxf5 Rxd2 21.Qxd2 Qe5 which cleverly takes advantage of b3 (threatening Qa1#) in order to simplify without compromising the pawn structure.  18.Qf2 can be met with Nxd3+/Bf5/Rad8 etc. with equality.

17.c4 which I think was dangerous last turn, now looks a little out of place, since it exposes White's king but doesn't really add anything to White attack.  For this reason I haven't looked at it so carefully, other than to note that Black can plan on re-routing his knight via f4 and e6 (with tempo) to a suitable home on d4 (supported by a pawn on c5).

17.Bc4 is complicated, but I think OK for Black.  I have a hard time keeping track of the variations in this line, but I think that 17...Nb6 holds things together.  If not, Black has many other choices, but this is the move that I believe is the best competitor to 17.g4.

And what of 17.g4?  In addition to the line quoted above (which still reigns as my 'verified' main line), Black has some more ambitious choices -- 17...Qg3 18.gxh5 Qxf3 19.hxg6 Qxh1 sees White  reply in kind by sacrificing a rook for some excellent attacking chances, and the uncertainty resulting makes life difficult for both sides.  An endgame where White has two pawns for the exchange seems likely to result.  After 17...hxg4 18.fxg4 Black can also try e5 with unclear complications.

So White has a chance to play for complications now, and Black will have his opportunity to decide whether or not to enter the 'melee' I alluded to in my previous post on the two subsequent moves.  I'd be interested in reading what others think of these ideas -- should Black go for the draw (after 17.g4 hxg4 18.fxg4 Qg3 19.h5 Qe3+ 20.Kb1 Qxd4 I can hardly pretend that Black is trying to win), or play one of the more ambitious lines above, and if so, which is most promising?

*

When I was looking back to check for the mention of Golubev's comments (thanks for that link, Ostap!) I saw those early remarks questioning the point of Qb6-a5-c7.  Few of the above lines feature Nc5 (and then usually not until an endgame has been reached), and a couple see Black's queen target the weakened dark squares on the queenside and the offsides knight.  So I am happy to see that my hopes for this line were not so absurd after all.  Of course, White still has the initiative, and it remains to be seen whether Black can prevent him from making something of it...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #65 - 07/14/06 at 17:09:24
Post Tools
Scholar wrote on 07/14/06 at 16:51:21:
It's not really in theoretical lines anymore...at least as far as I am aware, no one has really commented on 15...Qc7 (other than the remark below).   Also this isn't really a sideline...more of a sideline to the main line (which continues in theory until, say, move 24) so the fact that we're out of theory by move 16 is quite an accomplishment..

For me, staying in theory this long is the accomplishment.  Wink

Quote:
Sorry to be cagey, but there are some lines which I haven't worked out yet

No worries.  It's natural that some moves are only going to be worked out in detail after they have appeared on the board (too many alternatives to work through before the choice is narrowed).

Quote:
FightingDragon wrote on 07/04/06 at 09:12:14:

In Chess Today, Mikhail admits that he overlooked van den Doel-Rogers, Dutch Cht 2004 which went 15. ... Qc7 16.Bc4 Rd8 17.g4?! Be6 ... and white hardly had a serious advantage.


I meant to ask earlier, but since no one has elaborated, I assume that Golubev didn't say much about this line other than the fact that he had missed it when preparing the book?!  Maybe there is some analysis in the new edition of Experts vs. the Sicilian...so perhaps we are out of theory now but will return to it after that book makes it to market.

This Chess Today issue can be found at http://www.geocities.com/mikhail_golubev/CT-1665.pdf (it's a free issue, so download it) and Golubev's comments can be found in the annotated game Shirov-Polzin (note (a) to Black's 12th move).  

On van den Doel-Rogers, Golubev states: 
"...and White hardly had a serious advantage."
AND
"I must confess that I missed this game, while preparing the chapter for 'Experts'."

That's about it.  Although 15...Qc7 has been played a few times, it's hardly been subjected to anything resembling intense scrutiny.
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Scholar
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 557
Location: Chicago
Joined: 04/26/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #64 - 07/14/06 at 16:51:21
Post Tools
OstapBender wrote on 07/14/06 at 04:46:56:
Moves under consideration are 17.g4 (still the frontrunner), 17.Bc4, 17.c4 and 17.Bd3.

It think it's quite likely that I'll go with g4 and we'll follow one of the lines that we analyzed above (at least for a few moves).  Of the other candidate moves, 17.c4 is actually looking quite interesting and I need to take a closer look.

If anyone would like to make a case for one of the moves under consideration, or suggest another (brief supporting analysis would be nice  Smiley) now would be a good time to give your input.  Cool


I am not sure that 17.g4 is best (and I mean that literally -- it may be best, I just don't know), but we at least agree on the candidates; I guess you have decided against Rd2, so yours will be the first move outside of our collective databases.  Sorry to be cagey, but there are some lines which I haven't worked out yet -- and both sides have some nice tactical shots in the melee I imagine we are about to enter.

Smyslov_Fan wrote on 07/14/06 at 05:35:41:
It's scary that this line is theoretical all the way to move 20.  I thought this was a sideline variation!   Shocked  I'm getting convinced to stay as far away from the Dragon as possible from now on.


It's not really in theoretical lines anymore...at least as far as I am aware, no one has really commented on 15...Qc7 (other than the remark below).   Also this isn't really a sideline...more of a sideline to the main line (which continues in theory until, say, move 24) so the fact that we're out of theory by move 16 is quite an accomplishment.

FightingDragon wrote on 07/04/06 at 09:12:14:

In Chess Today, Mikhail admits that he overlooked van den Doel-Rogers, Dutch Cht 2004 which went 15. ... Qc7 16.Bc4 Rd8 17.g4?! Be6 ... and white hardly had a serious advantage.


I meant to ask earlier, but since no one has elaborated, I assume that Golubev didn't say much about this line other than the fact that he had missed it when preparing the book?!  Maybe there is some analysis in the new edition of Experts vs. the Sicilian...so perhaps we are out of theory now but will return to it after that book makes it to market.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #63 - 07/14/06 at 05:35:41
Post Tools
It's scary that this line is theoretical all the way to move 20.  I thought this was a sideline variation!   Shocked  I'm getting convinced to stay as far away from the Dragon as possible from now on.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #62 - 07/14/06 at 05:06:43
Post Tools
Scholar,

I haven't taken a further look at the Fedorchuk-Evdokimov game yet, but playing it through this morning I also thought 19...Rad8 seemed like a case of the wrong rook (I completely missed the subtle point about ...Bc8, however) and inviting White to play Nxe6 just looked ludicrous.

However, the game did get me wondering whether it is correct to consider 15...Bf5 16.g4 Be6 as an improved version of 15...Be6.  I think there are pros and cons to forcing White to play g4 and where the balance lies might not be all that clear.  Perhaps where the balance lies is determined by how skillfully the two sides make use of the change in position.

I'm enjoying our game and learning a lot from it.  I will post my next move over the weekend (likely on Saturday).

Cheers,
Ostap Smiley
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #61 - 07/14/06 at 04:46:56
Post Tools
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.f3 Bg7 7.Be3 0-0 8.Qd2 Nc6 9.0-0-0 d5 10.exd5 Nxd5 11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Bd4 Bxd4 13.Qxd4 Qb6 14.Na4 Qa5 15. b3 Qc7 16.h4 h5
http://www.france-echecs.com/diagramme/imgboard.phpfen=r1b2rk1/p1q1pp2/2p3p1/3n3...
Moves under consideration are 17.g4 (still the frontrunner), 17.Bc4, 17.c4 and 17.Bd3.

It think it's quite likely that I'll go with g4 and we'll follow one of the lines that we analyzed above (at least for a few moves).  Of the other candidate moves, 17.c4 is actually looking quite interesting and I need to take a closer look.

If anyone would like to make a case for one of the moves under consideration, or suggest another (brief supporting analysis would be nice  Smiley) now would be a good time to give your input.  Cool
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Scholar
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 557
Location: Chicago
Joined: 04/26/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #60 - 07/14/06 at 02:45:26
Post Tools
parisestmagique wrote on 07/13/06 at 12:30:33:
This is a game played yesterday at the Paris Championship the 12/07/2006 :
Fedorchuk (2592) - Evdokimov (2500) 1.e4 ç5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 çxd 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nç3 g6 6.Be3 Bg7 7.f3 Nç6 8.Qd2 00 9.000 d5 10.exd Nxd5 11.Nxç6 bxç 12.Bd4 BxB 13.QxB Qb6 14.Na4 Qa5 15.b3 Bf5 16.g4 Be6 17.Qe5 Qb4 18.ç4 Nf6 19.h4 Rad8 20.Be2 Nd7 21.Qe3 Nb6 22.Qç5 QxQ 23.NxQ Bç8 24.b4 Be6 25.NxB fxN 26.Kç2 e5 27.a4 Rd4 28.a5 Nd7 29.Rhe1 Rb8 30.Kç3 Kf8 31.Bd3 Rbd8 32.Re4 Rd6 33.g5 Ke8 34.Re3 Rd4 35.Rh1 Nf8 and 1-0 in about 60 moves.


I think 19...Rfd8 is stronger here, in order to attempt some plan on the b-file after Qa3+ (Kb1) Rab8.  In the game, 24...Be6 seems like suicide.  Black's justification for playing Rad8 is that it makes c8 a decent square for the bishop.  Of course giving White a queen trade on a platter like that is rarely a good idea in the Bf5 lines.  g4 didn't matter in this game -- Black could play this way after 15...Be6 and lose in the same fashion -- one simply can't trade queens without getting some concession from White.

An interesting game in this line where Black plays more actively is:

Maia,J - De Blasio,M
Email, 2000

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Be3 Bg7 7.f3 0-0 8.Qd2 Nc6 9.0-0-0 d5 10.exd5 Nxd5 11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Bd4 Bxd4 13.Qxd4 Qb6 14.Na4 Qa5 15.b3 Bf5 16.g4 Be6 17.Qe5 Qb4 18.c4 Nf6 19.h4 Rfd8 20.Be2 Nd7 21.Qe3 Rab8 22.h5 Qa3+ 23.Kb1 Qxa4 24.hxg6 Qb4 25.Bd3 hxg6 26.Bxg6 Nf8 27.Bd3 f6 28.Qh6 Rd6 29.Qh8+ 1/2-1/2
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Scholar
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 557
Location: Chicago
Joined: 04/26/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #59 - 07/14/06 at 02:22:28
Post Tools
I have seen nothing which would suggest that my original intention --  to play 16...h5 -- is not best, although Black's defense may be more difficult than I would like.  16...Qg3 is enterprising and worthy of further investigation, but I suspect that it is unsound.  Other moves allow White too much leeway in his attack -- I have no interest in suffering indefinitely in an inferior middlegame.

I wonder if my endgame skills will be put to the test, or if Ostap has an improvement on the lines above.

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.f3 Bg7 7.Be3 0-0 8.Qd2 Nc6 9.0-0-0 d5 10.exd5 Nxd5 11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Bd4 Bxd4 13.Qxd4 Qb6 14.Na4 Qa5 15. b3 Qc7 16.h4 h5
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: OstapBender-Scholar, Yugoslav 9.0-0-0 d5
Reply #58 - 07/13/06 at 14:04:10
Post Tools
parisestmagique wrote on 07/13/06 at 12:30:33:
This is a game played yesterday at the Paris Championship the 12/07/2006 :
Fedorchuk (2592) - Evdokimov (2500)

Thanks.  This is an interesting game with the the 15...Bf5 16.g4 Be6 line that we discussed earlier in this thread where it was suggested that it might be better than the immediate 15...Be6 because White has weakened the f4-square with 16.g4.  In this game, it doesn't look like the weakness of the f4-square played a very significant role while g2-g4 was ultimately a useful move (g4-g5 and h4-h5 were used to pry open the h-file).

I can't find the game Delchev-Cebalo (2005) that Frendo mentioned earlier (http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1151879306/15#29).  This game was also in the 15...Bf5 16.g4 Be6 line and I'm wondering how that game (where Black apparently had no problems) differed from the game played yesterday in the Paris Championship.  I have Delchev-Cebalo, Reggio Emilia 2004, which concluded (after 16...Be6)

17. Qe5 Qb4 18. c4 Nf6 19. Qc5 a5 20. Bd3 Nd7 21. Qxb4 axb4 22. Rhe1 Ra5 23. Be4 Rc8 1/2-1/2 Delchev-Cebalo, Reggio Emilia 2004.

Compared to this game White's 19.h4 is the point where the Fedorchuk-Evdokimov game diverges.
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 22
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo