Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Closed sicilian and Najdorf (Read 16647 times)
Pingudon
Senior Member
****
Offline


Hi chess friends!!

Posts: 286
Joined: 10/04/06
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #17 - 11/28/06 at 22:41:44
Post Tools
Thanks a lot for your answers. I think I will stick to ...d6. But the other variatios are worth a try  Wink
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #16 - 11/28/06 at 22:25:20
Post Tools
To MNb: I agree that Black has many good replies to 2.Nc3, for instance 2...e6.  I actually have more than one line I play against the GPA, because as a Paulsen/Taimanov/Kan player I have a lot of flexibility.  But the original question was about what a "die hard Najdorf player" should play.  I still think the simplest answer is 2...d6, because Black shouldn't let White move order him out of his repertoire.  Willempie's lines are interesting.  But assuming Black wants to keep his option of playing a Najdorf open -- which seems like a pretty safe assumption given the title of the thread "Closed sicilian and Najdorf" -- I recommend playing 2...d6.  That's all.

To Pingudon: the 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6 3.f4 lines are not that scary; I recommend you play those.  Regarding 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nge2 e5, I have a little experience here in casual games because I play the Kalashnikov every now and then.  Black may be fine theoretically, but I get the feeling that White's position is easier/more fun to play over the board.  But it's not a big deal; just try it out in a few games.  I assume you plan on answering 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 with 3...e5 as well.

edit: Sometimes I think we get a bit carried away in our discussions (nothing wrong with that), but here I've been trying to answer Pingudon's questions, not start a new discussion on what to play against the GPA.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10779
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #15 - 11/28/06 at 21:33:11
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 11/28/06 at 02:17:44:
MNb, you're right...to an extent.  But my point isn't all about the GPA; what if White plays 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 Nge2, for instance?  How does a Najdorf player answer that?  If 3...d6, White can go for a Closed Sicilian when ...a6 is really not necessary from Black.

...


First of all, I am not stating, that 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6 3.f4 is bad for Black. Fact is, that some Najdorf players don't feel comfortable. Another fact is, that aggressive natures like me don't object playing this as White. So it is worth the effort, to investigate other options for Black. 
Then I already have explained, that 2...a6 not always is a loss of tempo in the Closed Sicilian. It is indeed, when Black plays the regular ...g6 somewhere. So I suggested a St George approach, with b5, Bb7, e6 and d5. Now here might be a contradiction: Black would like to play ...d6 (and not ...d5) to keep the transposition to a normal Najdorf open. 
Willempie already answered Eric's argument: 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 3.Nge2 Nc6 etc. Provide, that Black plays the Najdorf/Scheveningen mix, also 3...e6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 d6 is possible. 
I have one question for Eric. Wouldn't you be happy to have two reliable ways available to meet the GPA? 
That's what the debate is about: to prove the last argument pro GPA worthless. In the meantime you have my blessings to play 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6. So you should see 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 as a thought experiment, which actually might become useful in the future.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
woofwoof
God Member
*****
Offline


chess is like life

Posts: 929
Location: Singapore
Joined: 07/04/05
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #14 - 11/28/06 at 16:30:46
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 11/27/06 at 01:48:45:
Then it is quite remarkable, that Black has 55% after 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 !
In a thread on the GPA it became clear, that after 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4 e6 4.Nf3 a6 White has nothing better than 5.d4, transposing to a Taimanov/Paulsen/Kan or whatever it's called.
So I suppose, that Black should not fear 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 3.f4 e6.
But White has not done very well either with 3.g3 b5 4.Bg2 Bb7. Of course Black will not fianchetto the other bishop; then ...a6 might indeed appear superfluous. Instead Black will play ...e6 and ...d5. This looks like an improve St George: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 a6 and 3...b5.
I'd say, that this is interesting stuff for diehard Najdorfians.


Shocked Well... This is indeed very edifying. I never imagined that my 'invention' had good stats as well as offering quite a degree of flexibility! I do essay a Paulsen every once in a while so no problems transposing there. Thanks very much for this. 

Quote:
what about 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3/Nge2 a6? Now 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 would lead to Najdorf-like territory (plus you have the added bonus that white may play 6.Nxc6), while non-d4 moves dont particularly impress me (as mentioned above).


Thanks also to Willempie for this interesting suggestion.
  

"I don't make mistakes. I make prophecies which immediately turn out to be wrong." - Murray Walker
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #13 - 11/28/06 at 02:17:44
Post Tools
MNb, you're right...to an extent.  But my point isn't all about the GPA; what if White plays 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 Nge2, for instance?  How does a Najdorf player answer that?  If 3...d6, White can go for a Closed Sicilian when ...a6 is really not necessary from Black.

Anyways I guess the bottom line is that there are a lot of options for Black in the anti-Sicilians!  As a Sicilian player myself, I have a wonderful score against antis so it doesn't surprise me that Black has a lot of interesting moves at his disposal.  But I still think that, for a player that wants a Najdorf, 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6 is best.  The ONLY "drawback" is that 3.f4 might be better than after 2...Nc6.  I really don't think this is any big deal, as I think that Black is still 100% OK.  Thus, Najdorf players should go 2...d6 and not let White players move-order them out of their repertoire.  That's my opinion...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pingudon
Senior Member
****
Offline


Hi chess friends!!

Posts: 286
Joined: 10/04/06
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #12 - 11/28/06 at 02:03:46
Post Tools
That is a very interesting stuff... but what do you think about 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nge2 e5!! and no GP attack. It seems a drawish line but being black I do no mind drawing against Topalov Cheesy
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10779
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #11 - 11/28/06 at 01:55:34
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 11/27/06 at 02:30:48:
I agree that after 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4 e6 4.Nf3 a6 White has nothing better than 5.d4, but perhaps nearly as good is 5.g3.  But that's a different discussion...

Still, doesn't this mean that Black needs to learn a whole new Open Sicilian just to avoid a so-called "improved" version of the GPA?


I wouldn't call this "a whole new Open Sicilian". The early f2-f4 is not very common after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.Nc3 (no 5.c4, no 5.Bd3) Nc6 and after 6.f4 Black has some independent options like ...d5; ...Nge7 and maybe even ....Bb4.
Black can bet, that the average GPA player is a specialist after 2...d6 3.f4, but not on this not so whole new Open Sicilian stuff.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #10 - 11/27/06 at 19:27:46
Post Tools
See: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1150894032/15#27 in the thread mentioned above by MNb.
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
chk
God Member
*****
Offline


a pawn is a pawn

Posts: 1063
Location: Athens
Joined: 10/26/06
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #9 - 11/27/06 at 17:30:25
Post Tools
Well tbh, I usually play the pure Najdorf set-ups, i.e. prefering Nbd7 over Nc6 (with some exceptions).. It's all a matter of taste I suppose.. Roll Eyes
  

"I play honestly and I play to win. If I lose, I take my medicine." - Bobby
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #8 - 11/27/06 at 12:20:59
Post Tools
what about 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3/Nge2 a6? Now 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 would lead to Najdorf-like territory (plus you have the added bonus that white may play 6.Nxc6), while non-d4 moves dont particularly impress me (as mentioned above).
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
chk
God Member
*****
Offline


a pawn is a pawn

Posts: 1063
Location: Athens
Joined: 10/26/06
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #7 - 11/27/06 at 11:57:25
Post Tools
Just food for thought for you guys:

Say you want to include in your repertoire a second (different) Open Sicilian (Acc. Dragon, Classical or Paulsen/Taimanov). You can easily introduce your new line every time you get the above-mentioned move-order (i.e. 2. Nc3) since in this way you avoid the Maroczy. So you only have to semi-prepare for a second Sicilian at first (still a lot of work! - what am I saying Lips Sealed)
  

"I play honestly and I play to win. If I lose, I take my medicine." - Bobby
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #6 - 11/27/06 at 02:30:48
Post Tools
I agree that after 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4 e6 4.Nf3 a6 White has nothing better than 5.d4, but perhaps nearly as good is 5.g3.  But that's a different discussion...

Still, doesn't this mean that Black needs to learn a whole new Open Sicilian just to avoid a so-called "improved" version of the GPA?  I think the simplest thing for Najdorf players to do is just play 2...d6.  I really don't think that 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6 3.f4 is anything to worry about; I'm not even sure it's better for White than the standard 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4, though a discussion of the line should be moved to another thread.  In practice Black must be a little more accurate here, but in theory I don't think he has anything to worry about.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10779
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #5 - 11/27/06 at 01:48:45
Post Tools
Then it is quite remarkable, that Black has 55% after 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 !
In a thread on the GPA it became clear, that after 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4 e6 4.Nf3 a6 White has nothing better than 5.d4, transposing to a Taimanov/Paulsen/Kan or whatever it's called.
So I suppose, that Black should not fear 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 3.f4 e6.
But White has not done very well either with 3.g3 b5 4.Bg2 Bb7. Of course Black will not fianchetto the other bishop; then ...a6 might indeed appear superfluous. Instead Black will play ...e6 and ...d5. This looks like an improve St George: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 a6 and 3...b5.
I'd say, that this is interesting stuff for diehard Najdorfians.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #4 - 11/26/06 at 20:57:37
Post Tools
I'm sure 2...a6 isn't really bad, but it's ofen unnecessary in the Closed Sicilian.   

A lot of Open Sicilian players (at least ones that I know) are aware of the move order problems that Najdorf and Sveshnikov players have, etc., and so play things like 1.e4 2.Nc3 3.Nge2 and 4.d4 or 1.e4 2.Nf3 3.Nc3 and 4.d4.  The only drawback to this is that they can't play the Maroczy bind anymore, but in my experience most Open Sicilian players (under 2300 or so) aren't really interested in the Maroczy bind anyways; they'd much rather have more active piece play.  For instance, doing a quick search of my own games after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cd 4.Nxd4 Nc6, I see that only 2 out of 13 opponents (rated between 1770 and 2400 USCF) went in for a Maroczy bind.  In other words, I don't think many White players mind giving up the option of the Maroczy and so like to annoy potential Najdorf and Sveshnikov players.

Personally, because of the above considerations, I'd just play 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6.  Don't allow White to move-order you out of your main lines; the only drawback to 2...d6 is a slightly inferior setup against the Grand Prix, but...if you're afraid of this line you really shouldn't be playing the Sicilian anyway!  Black should still be fine after 2...d6 in the Grand Prix.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
woofwoof
God Member
*****
Offline


chess is like life

Posts: 929
Location: Singapore
Joined: 07/04/05
Gender: Male
Re: Closed sicilian and Najdorf
Reply #3 - 11/26/06 at 16:46:42
Post Tools
I was also thinking quite a bit abt what to do with this 2.Nc3 move. Not sure abt how good this is as Ive yet to test it out, but my current idea is 2...a6. Undecided
  

"I don't make mistakes. I make prophecies which immediately turn out to be wrong." - Murray Walker
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo