ErictheRed wrote on 11/28/06 at 02:17:44:
MNb, you're right...to an extent. But my point isn't all about the GPA; what if White plays 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 Nge2, for instance? How does a Najdorf player answer that? If 3...d6, White can go for a Closed Sicilian when ...a6 is really not necessary from Black.
...
First of all, I am not stating, that 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6 3.f4 is bad for Black. Fact is, that some Najdorf players don't feel comfortable. Another fact is, that aggressive natures like me don't object playing this as White. So it is worth the effort, to investigate other options for Black.
Then I already have explained, that 2...a6 not always is a loss of tempo in the Closed Sicilian. It is indeed, when Black plays the regular ...g6 somewhere. So I suggested a St George approach, with b5, Bb7, e6 and d5. Now here might be a contradiction: Black would like to play ...d6 (and not ...d5) to keep the transposition to a normal Najdorf open.
Willempie already answered Eric's argument: 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 3.Nge2 Nc6 etc. Provide, that Black plays the Najdorf/Scheveningen mix, also 3...e6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 d6 is possible.
I have one question for Eric. Wouldn't you be happy to have two reliable ways available to meet the GPA?
That's what the debate is about: to prove the last argument pro GPA worthless. In the meantime you have my blessings to play 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6. So you should see 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 a6 as a thought experiment, which actually might become useful in the future.